Lymph Node Failure Pattern and Treatment Results of Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated with Definitive Radiotherapy

Author(s):  
Sun Young Lee ◽  
Hyoung Cheol Kwon ◽  
Heui Kwan Lee ◽  
Jung Soo Kim ◽  
Soo Geon Kim
Author(s):  
Puja Gaur ◽  
Boris Sepesi ◽  
Wayne L. Hofstetter ◽  
Arlene M. Correa ◽  
Manoop S. Bhutani ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 151-151
Author(s):  
Kentaro Murakami

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer does not have a good prognosis despite being resectable. A recent randomized controlled trial (the Dutch CROSS study) showed the superiority of preoperative chemo-radiotherapy over surgery alone with regard to the five-year survival. At present, this therapeutic approach is regarded as the standard care in the United States and Europe. However, the prognosis in cases where part of the tumor remains is poor, so additional adjuvant therapy is required. The impact of the histopathological lymph node metastases status after preoperative chemo-radiotherapy on the prognosis is unknown, and is which patients require additional adjuvant therapy to manage lymph node metastases. Methods Esophageal cancer patients with more than five lymph node metastases or lymph node metastases spreading into three fields have a poor prognosis, despite their tumor being resectable. We therefore performed neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy in these patients in 1998 (NACRT group). We also performed chemo-radiotherapy for initially unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer invading adjacent organs and curative surgery for the above-mentioned patients in whom the invasion had disappeared after chemo-radiotherapy (conversion group). The chemo-radiotherapy regimen was the same for both groups and consisted of radiotherapy 40 Gy/20 fr and chemotherapy with 5-FU (500 mg/m2 days 0–4) and CDDP (15 mg/m2 days 1–5). We then examined the impact of the histopathological lymph node metastasis status after preoperative chemo-radiotherapy on the prognosis in our institute. Results Patients with three or more histopathological lymph node metastases had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with fewer metastases in both groups. In the NACRT group, the 5-year survival rate was 35.5% vs. 36.1% (number of lymph node metastases 0 vs. ≥ 1; P = 0.889), 34.0% vs. 36.7% (0–1 vs. ≥ 2; P = 0.678), and 47.1% vs. 0% (0–2 vs. ≥ 3; P = 0.003). In conversion group, it was 40.4% vs. 43.6% (number of lymph node metastases 0 vs. ≥ 1; P = 0.841), 45.6% vs. 33.6% (0–1 vs. ≥ 2; P = 0.106), and 49.5% vs. 20.0% (0–2 vs. ≥ 3; P = 0.025). Conclusion Patients with three or more histopathological lymph node metastases after preoperative chemo-radiotherapy had a significantly poorer prognosis than those with fewer metastases and required additional adjuvant therapy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hirai ◽  
J. Hihara ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
N. Nishimoto ◽  
Y. Kagawa ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Ying Li ◽  
Pei-Ming Huang ◽  
Pei-Yi Chu ◽  
Po-Ming Chen ◽  
Mong-Wei Lin ◽  
...  

Tumor recurrence is an important problem threatening esophageal cancer patients after surgery, even when they achieve a pathologic major response (pMR) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT). The predictors related to overall survival and disease progression for these patients remain elusive. We aimed to identify factors that predict disease progression and overall survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) patients who achieve a pMR after neoadjuvant CCRT followed by surgery. We conducted a retrospective study to analyze the factors influencing survival and disease progression after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients who had a major response to CCRT, which is defined by complete pathological response or microscopic residual disease without lymph node metastasis. From our study cohort, 285 patients underwent CCRT and subsequent esophagectomy; 171 (60%) of these patients achieved pMR. After excluding patients with lymph node metastases, incomplete clinical data, and adenocarcinomas, we enrolled 117 patients in this study. We found that the CCRT regimen was the only factor that influenced overall survival. The overall survival of the patients receiving taxane-incorporated CCRT was superior to that of patients receiving traditional cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF) (P=0.011). The CCRT regimen can significantly influence the clinical outcome of esophageal SCC patients who achieve pMR after neoadjuvant CCRT and esophagectomy. Incorporation of taxanes into cisplatin-based CCRT may be associated with prolonged survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document