scholarly journals Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotype among Moroccan women during a local screening program

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 732-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaitouna Alhamany ◽  
Mohammed El Mzibri ◽  
Aicha Kharbach ◽  
Abderrahman Malihy ◽  
Redouane Abouqal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Abnormal Cytology ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Moroccan Women

Introduction: Many studies have indicated a causal relationship between genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and cervical cancer. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and genotypes of six high-risk oncogenic human papillomaviruses in cervical lesions from Moroccan women with normal and abnormal cytology. Methodology: The study included 938 women from the Children's and Mothers' Pathology Department of Ibn Sina Hospital, Rabat. Cytopathology examination was done by routine PAP smear testing. HPV DNA testing was conducted using DNA amplification by Polymerase Chain Reaction with subsequent typing by hybridization with specific probes for HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35 and 45. Results: Cytopathology testing showed that only 16.3 % had an abnormal cytology, with a predominance of atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cases. The overall HPV prevalence was 15.7%. According to the cytology results, HPV infection was detected in 15.8% of normal and 14.38% of abnormal cases. Specific HPV genotyping showed a predominance of HPV 16 and 18. Double infection (HPV 16 + 18) was found in two cases whereas multiple infections (HPV 16+18+31) were detected in only one case. Evaluation of the relationship between HPV status and some environmental risk factors, including individual, socio-economic, and hygiene status, showed a significant association between HPV infection and oral contraceptive use. Conclusion: Based on these data, a combination of cytology and HPV DNA testing allows for identification of patients with a high risk of developing high-grade cervical lesions and improves cervical cancer prevention.

Can Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing Substitute for Cytology in the Detection of High-Grade Cervical Lesions?

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 298-302
Author(s):  
Kyung-Ju Lee ◽  
Jae-Kwan Lee ◽  
Ho-Suk Saw
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cervical Lesion ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Abnormal Cytology ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Conventional Cytology ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Papillomavirus Dna

Abstract Context.—High-risk human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are causal factors of cervical carcinomas. Objective.—To evaluate the sensitivity and efficiency of HPV DNA testing in comparison with conventional cytology for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer. Design.—Both testing procedures were administered to 593 women, aged 14 to 88 years (average, 41.7 years), who were referred for abnormal cytology from January 2000 through December 2001 at Korea University Guro Hospital (Seoul, Korea). After histologic confirmation by either colposcopically directed biopsy or endocervical curettage, the efficiency of the detection methods for high-grade cervical lesion was evaluated for the following 3 data sets: HPV DNA testing, conventional cytology, and the 2 tests combined. Results.—The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive, and negative predictive values for the detection of CIN 2 or higher were 92.4%, 52.4%, 49.3%, and 93.2% for HPV DNA testing; 76.3%, 65.8%, 52.8%, and 84.7% for cytology; and 97.8%, 36.7%, 49.2%, and 97.3% for the combined tests. Among the 151 patients diagnosed with CIN 2 or CIN 3, 137 patients (90.7%) were HPV positive, 116 patients (76.8%) were proven to have abnormal cytology, and 147 patients (97.6%) were positive for either HPV DNA testing or cytology. The sensitivity values for HPV DNA testing and cytology were 97.9% (46/47) and 74.5% (35/47), respectively, for invasive cervical cancer detection, and the combined tests showed 100% (47/47) sensitivity. Depending on the patient's age and the grade of the cervical lesion, HPV DNA testing proved to be significantly more sensitive than cytology for the primary detection of cervical abnormalities (P < .001). Conclusion.—Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions was more sensitive than cytology alone. In addition, the screening sensitivity can be further improved by combining cytology with HPV DNA testing. This approach is especially beneficial in detecting cancer precursors in women older than 60 years.

Epidemiologic correlates of antibody response to human papillomavirus among women at low risk of cervical cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Nonnenmacher ◽  
J Pintos ◽  
M C Bozzetti ◽  
I Mielzinska-Lohnas ◽  
A T Lorincz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Humoral Response ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Serological Response ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv Dna

A population at low risk for developing cervical cancer in Southern Brazil was studied to identify the main determinants of serological response to human papillomavirus (HPV). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests were performed in 976 women to detect serum IgG antibodies against HPV 16 L1 virus-like particles (VLPs) and HPVs 16, 18, 6 and 11 L1 VLPs as a mixture of antigens. Women with four or more sexual partners were more likely to be seropositive than women with one partner (HPV 16 serology odds ratio [OR]=3.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-4.8; HPV 6/11/16/18 serology OR=4.64, 95% CI: 3.0-7.2). HPV DNA and both serological responses were associated. Those positives to HPV 16 serology were twice as likely to have a cytological diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) than seronegatives (OR=2.07; 95% CI: 1.0-4.5, and OR=1.73; 95% CI: 0.8-3.8). Seropositivity to HPV 16 and HPV 6/11/16/18 antigens seem to be better markers of past sexual activity than current HPV infection, and humoral response to HPV 16 or HPV 6/11/16/18 may not be a strong indicator of cervical lesions in populations at low risk for cervical lesions.

scholarly journals Genotypes distribution of human papillomavirus in cervical samples of Ecuadorian women

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo David García Muentes ◽  
Lindsay Karen García Rodríguez ◽  
Ramiro Israel Burgos Galarraga ◽  
Franklin Almeida Carpio ◽  
Juan Carlos Ruiz Cabezas
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Multiple Infections ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv 18

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is considered a necessary causative agent for developing oropharyngeal, anal and cervical cancer. Among women in Ecuadorian population, cervical cancer ranks as the second most common gynecological cancer. Not many studies about HPV burden have been published in Ecuador, and genotypes distribution has not been established yet. The little data available suggest the presence of other genotypes different than 16 and 18. Objectives: In the present study, we attempt to estimate the prevalence of HPV 16, HPV 18 and other 35 genotypes among Ecuadorian women undergoing cervical cancer screening. The overall prevalence of HPV infection was also estimated. Methods: Routine cervical samples were analyzed using Linear Array(r) HPV Genotyping test (Roche). Results: A total of 1,581 cervical samples obtained from Ecuadorian women undergoing cervical cancer screening were included in this study. HPV DNA was detected in 689 cervical samples (43.58%). Of these samples, 604 (38.20%) were positive for a single HPV genotype, while another 85 (5.37%) samples were positive for multiple HPV types. Genotype 16 (5.50%) resulted in the most frequently detected type in both single and multiple infections. HPV 33 (4.55%) and HPV 11 (3.80%) occupied the second and the third place in frequency among all detected genotypes. Conclusions: Viral genotypes different from HPV 16 and HPV 18 are frequently detected among Ecuadorian women. The overall prevalence of HPV resulted higher than the one reported in other South American countries with a greater burden in the second and third decades of life.

State of HPV16 integration in Lithuanian women with cervical neoplasia

Open Medicine ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-212
Author(s):  
Agne Sepetiene ◽  
Zivile Gudlevicienė ◽  
Zana Bumbuliene ◽  
Grazina Drasutiene ◽  
Janina Didziapetriene
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Cin Iii ◽  
Cell Genome ◽  
Virus Integration

AbstractCervical cancer morbidity and mortality in Lithuania is one of the biggest in the European Union. The main risk factor of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus (HPV). The deletion of the HPV E2 gene influences HPV DNA integration into the cell genome, as well as a rapid progression of cervical lesions. The purpose of this study is to determine HPV, its types, and HPV 16 integration in different grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN). 253 women with cytological lesions were involved in the study. After a histology, 31 women were diagnosed with CIN I, 35 with CIN II, and 51 with CIN III. The biggest prevalence of HPV infection was detected in women younger than 25 years old (69.7%) and in women with CIN II (90.9%). HPV 16 was detected in 67.8% of all cases, with the highest prevalence in CIN III (84.4%). A partial integration form was detected in 65.0% of HPV 16 infected women, a complete virus integration in 26.5%, and an episomal form in 8.4% of cases. Our study concludes that in all the cases confirmed using a histology, the partial virus integration form of CIN was identified the most. It was less frequently detected in CIN I cases (60.0%), but more frequently in CIN II and CIN III cases (72.8 and 69.3%, respectively).

The evaluation of human papillomavirus DNA testing in primary screening for cervical lesions in a large Japanese population

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Inoue ◽  
J. Sakaguchi ◽  
T. Sasagawa ◽  
M. Tango
Keyword(s):  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Single Type ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Papanicolaou Test ◽  
Histologic Diagnosis ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
High Risk Hpv

To examine the utility of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing for the screening of cervical cancer and its precursors, a prospective cohort study was performed in which a total of 8156 women with a median age of 36 years were enrolled. Two smear samples scraped from the uterine cervix were served for Papanicolaou test and HPV DNA testing (Hybrid Capture-II system). HPV-positive samples were further examined for HPV subtype using a DNA microarry chip. Women with cytologic abnormality or those with high-risk HPV DNA were further examined by colposcopy to determine histologic diagnosis. High-risk HPV DNA was detected in 11% of the general population, with higher prevalence of specific types, including 52, 16, 58, 51, 56, and 18. As expected, younger women were likely to have increased frequency of HPV infection. Notably, HPV DNA testing detected all 45 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, while cytologic findings were negative in 6 of these cases. It is of particular interest that CIN was commonly associated with multiple HPV types, while invasive cancers had a single type of HPV. In terms of both sensitivity and positive predictive value in detecting the CIN, HPV DNA testing is superior to cytology. However, most importantly, HPV DNA testing in combination with cytology significantly improved the efficacy to CIN screening.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and mRNA primary cervical cancer screening: Evaluation and triaging options for HPV-positive women

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 212-218
Author(s):  
Suleeporn Sangrajrang ◽  
Piyawat Laowahutanont ◽  
Metee Wongsena ◽  
Richard Muwonge ◽  
Weerawut Imsamran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Dna Testing ◽  
Hpv Dna ◽  
Hpv Genotyping ◽  
Hpv Dna Testing ◽  
Hpv Types ◽  
Liquid Based Cytology ◽  
Hpv Mrna ◽  
Oncogenic Hpv

Objective Cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in Thai women; human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause. This study aimed to determine the clinical performance of HPV mRNA compared with HPV DNA testing. Methods Cervical specimens were collected from women aged 35 to 60 who attended the routine organized screening programme. We compared accuracy parameters of standalone HPV mRNA and HPV DNA tests, and those of triaging with liquid-based cytology or HPV genotyping and liquid-based cytology for those positive only for the less oncogenic HPV types. Test accuracy parameters were estimated using latent class analysis using Bayesian models. Results Of the 5046 women enrolled, 174 (3.4%) were HPV DNA positive and 141 (2.8%) HPV mRNA positive. Colposcopy compliance was 95.4% ( n = 166) among HPV DNA-positive women and 94.3% ( n = 133) among those HPV mRNA positive. The estimated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for detection of CIN2 or worse were 67.4%, 97.1%, 12.1% for HPV DNA testing, and 73.1%, 97.8%, 16.3% for HPV mRNA testing. These estimates for triaging of HPV DNA-positive women with liquid-based cytology were 64.4%, 98.8%, and 19.0%, respectively, and slightly better for liquid-based cytology triage of HPV mRNA-positive women, at 71.8%, 98.9%, and 22.1%. Conclusion A triaging strategy based on HPV genotyping and liquid-based cytology for those positive only for the less oncogenic HPV types had test characteristics comparable with that of liquid-based cytology triage. The HPV mRNA detection-based strategies had non-significant advantages over the HPV DNA detection-based strategies.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Cancer Screening among Riverside Women of the Brazilian Amazon

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (07) ◽  
pp. 350-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Duarte ◽  
Rodrigo Vieira ◽  
Elza Brito ◽  
Maria Pinheiro ◽  
Jeniffer Monteiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Pap Test ◽  
Brazilian Amazon ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Cervical Lesions ◽  
Hpv 16 ◽  
Hpv 18

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the overall and type-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection among females living in riverside communities in the state of Pará, in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon. These communities are inhabited by low-income people, and are accessible only by small boats. Cervical cytology and risk factors for HPV infection were also assessed. Methods Cervical samples from 353 women of selected communities were collected both for Papanicolau (Pap) test and HPV detection. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time PCR were used to assess the overall and type-specific prevalence of HPV-16 and HPV-18, the main oncogenic types worldwide. Epidemiological questionnaires were used for the assessment of the risk factors for HPV infection. Results The mean age of the participants was 37 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 13.7). Most were married or with a fixed sexual partner (79%), and had a low educational level (80%) and family monthly income (< U$ 250; 53%). Overall, HPV prevalence was 16.4% (n = 58), with 8 cases of HPV-16 (2.3%) and 5 of HPV-18 (1.4%). Almost 70% of the women surveyed had never undergone the Pap test. Abnormal cytology results were found in 27.5% (n = 97) of the samples, with higher rates of HPV infection according to the severity of the lesions (p = 0.026). Conclusions The infections by HPV-16 and HPV-18 were not predominant in our study, despite the high prevalence of overall HPV infection. Nevertheless, the oncogenic potential of these types and the low coverage of the Pap test among women from riverside communities demonstrate a potential risk for the development of cervical lesions and their progression to cervical cancer, since the access to these communities is difficult and, in most cases, these women do not have access to primary care and public health services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document