scholarly journals Clinical and virological response to antiretroviral drugs among HIV patients on first-line treatment in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (07) ◽  
pp. 845-852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausta Mosha ◽  
Johanna Ledwaba ◽  
Faustine Ndugulile ◽  
Zipora Ng’ang’a ◽  
Peter Nsubuga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Virological Response ◽  
Dar Es Salaam ◽  
Antiretroviral Drugs ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Median Percentage ◽  
Nnrti Resistance

Introduction: In Tanzania, the follow-up on antiretroviral therapy (ART) response is based on clinical outcomes. We investigated virological response and ARV resistance mutations in relation to clinical response in ARV-treated patients. Methodology: A cross-sectional study of a cohort of 150 patients taking first-line ART in Dar-es-Salaam was conducted. Data were collected using standardized questionnaires and patients’ blood samples. HIV viral load testing and genotyping was performed on all viremic samples. Statistical analyses compared clinical responders and non-responders. Results: The median time on ART was 20 months; 71 (47%) patients were ART clinical responders. Clinical non-responders were more likely to have started ART with advanced disease with significantly lower median percentage weight gain (6% versus 20%) with respect to pre-treatment levels. Sixty-one (86%) and 64 (81%) of clinical responders and non-responders, respectively, had undetectable viral loads. Genotyping was successful in 24 (96%) virologically failing patients, among whom 83% had resistance mutations; 67% had dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)/non-NRTI (NNRTI) resistance mutations. Seventeen (71%) and 19 (79%) patients had NRTI and NNRTI resistance mutations, respectively, which were related to the ART in use, with no difference between clinical responders and non-responders. The most prevalent subtypes were A and C, found in 9 (38%) and 7 (29%) patients, respectively. Conclusions: The observed virological response was high and did not correlate with clinical response. The prevalence of ARV resistance mutations was high in viraemic patients and was related to the ARV prescribed. We recommend use of viral load monitoring during ART in Tanzania.

scholarly journals HSV-2 Infection as a Potential Cofactor for HIV Disease Progression and Selection of Drug Resistance Mutations in Adults under WHO-Recommended First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy: A Multicentric, Cross-Sectional Study in Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, and Gabon

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Abdoulaye Mihimit ◽  
Chatté Adawaye ◽  
Hélène Péré ◽  
Cecilia Costiniuk ◽  
Donato Koyalta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Central Africa ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Hiv Disease ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean

Although herpes simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) infection is a known cofactor for HIV transmission in Central Africa, its role in HIV disease progression is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the potential link between HSV-2 infection and HIV disease progression, in addition to identifying the presence of genes conferring HIV antiretroviral resistance mutations. This was a cross-sectional study involving 302 HIV-infected adults in Central Africa with virological failure (viral load >1000 copies/mL) on first-line antiretroviral therapy from four different countries. The seroprevalence of HSV-2 was 32% (96/302). Amongst the HIV-infected individuals who were HSV-2 seropositive, the mean HIV viral load and CD4 count were 4.82 ± 0.83 log copies/mL and 243 ± 144 cells/microliter, respectively. Among the HIV-infected individuals who were HSV-2-seronegative, the mean HIV viral load and CD4 count were 3.48 ± 0.44 log copies/mL and 646 ± 212 cells/microliter, respectively (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.001) between HSV-2 seropositivity and the presence of resistance mutations to antiretrovirals (ARV), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI), and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) with odds ratios of 9.7, 10, and 11.9, respectively. There was no link between HSV-2 serostatus and protease inhibitor (PI) resistance mutations. There was a substantial accumulation of resistance mutations in HSV-2-seropositive compared to -seronegative patients. These findings support the link between HIV disease progression and HSV-2 infection. An association was observed between the presence of NNRTI and NRTI resistance mutations and HSV-2 seropositivity.

scholarly journals Predictors of virological failure among people living with HIV receiving first line antiretroviral treatment in Myanmar: retrospective cohort analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Mesic ◽  
Alexander Spina ◽  
Htay Thet Mar ◽  
Phone Thit ◽  
Tom Decroo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Antiretroviral Treatment ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
History Of ◽  
Living With Hiv

Abstract Background Progress toward the global target for 95% virological suppression among those on antiretroviral treatment (ART) is still suboptimal. We describe the viral load (VL) cascade, the incidence of virological failure and associated risk factors among people living with HIV receiving first-line ART in an HIV cohort in Myanmar treated by the Médecins Sans Frontières in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and Sports Myanmar. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including adult patients with at least one HIV viral load test result and having received of at least 6 months’ standard first-line ART. The incidence rate of virological failure (HIV viral load ≥ 1000 copies/mL) was calculated. Multivariable Cox’s regression was performed to identify risk factors for virological failure. Results We included 25,260 patients with a median age of 33.1 years (interquartile range, IQR 28.0–39.1) and a median observation time of 5.4 years (IQR 3.7–7.9). Virological failure was documented in 3,579 (14.2%) participants, resulting in an overall incidence rate for failure of 2.5 per 100 person-years of follow-up. Among those who had a follow-up viral load result, 1,258 (57.1%) had confirmed virological failure, of which 836 (66.5%) were switched to second-line treatment. An increased hazard for failure was associated with age ≤ 19 years (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 1.51; 95% confidence intervals, CI 1.20–1.89; p < 0.001), baseline tuberculosis (aHR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.49; p < 0.001), a history of low-level viremia (aHR 1.60; 95% CI 1.42–1.81; p < 0.001), or a history of loss-to-follow-up (aHR 1.24; 95% CI 1.41–1.52; p = 0.041) and being on the same regimen (aHR 1.37; 95% CI 1.07–1.76; p < 0.001). Cumulative appointment delay was not significantly associated with failure after controlling for covariates. Conclusions VL monitoring is an important tool to improve programme outcomes, however limited coverage of VL testing and acting on test results hampers its full potential. In our cohort children and adolescents, PLHIV with history of loss-to-follow-up or those with low-viremia are at the highest risk of virological failure and might require more frequent virological monitoring than is currently recommended.

Pre-treatment and acquired HIV drug resistance in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania in the era of tenofovir and routine viral load monitoring

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 3016-3020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Godfrey Barabona ◽  
Macdonald Mahiti ◽  
Salim Masoud ◽  
Peter Mbelele ◽  
Amina Shaban Mgunya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Dar Es Salaam ◽  
Antiretroviral Drugs ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Genetic Barrier ◽  
Hiv Drug Resistance ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Treat All

Abstract Objectives We investigated the prevalence and patterns of pre-treatment and acquired HIV drug resistance mutations (DRMs) in Tanzania as a ‘treat all’ strategy, virological monitoring and the progressive increase in usage of tenofovir are being implemented in HIV treatment programmes. Methods Viral RNA was isolated from plasma of 60 ART-naive and 166 treated-but-viraemic (>400 copies/mL) HIV-1-infected adults attending a care and treatment clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, between June and October 2017. Viral genes encoding protease and reverse transcriptase were amplified by PCR and directly sequenced. Results Viral genotyping of successfully amplified samples revealed pre-treatment DRMs in 14/47 (29.8%) ART-naive subjects. Of these, 7/47 (14.9%) harboured mutations that confer high-level resistance to at least one drug of the default first-line regimen. In treated-but-viraemic subjects, DRMs were found in 100/111 (90%), where DRMs against NNRTI, NRTI and PI were observed in 95/100 (95%), 92/100 (92%) and 13/100 (13%), respectively. Tenofovir-resistance mutations K65R and K70G/E or ≥3 thymidine analogue resistance mutations including M41L and L210W were found in 18/36 (50%) subjects on a tenofovir-containing regimen at failure. Four patients harboured multiple DRMs, which can confer resistance to all available ART regimens in Tanzania. Conclusions Taken together, pre-treatment and acquired DRMs were highly prevalent, which represents a major risk for the efficacy of ART programmes in Tanzania. Availability of a newer generation of antiretroviral drugs with a higher genetic barrier to resistance and robust treatment monitoring is warranted for effective and sustainable HIV treatment.

scholarly journals Prevalence of viral load suppression, predictors of virological failure and patterns of HIV drug resistance after 12 and 48 months on first-line antiretroviral therapy: a national cross-sectional survey in Uganda

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1280-1289
Author(s):  
Deogratius Ssemwanga ◽  
Juliet Asio ◽  
Christine Watera ◽  
Maria Nannyonjo ◽  
Faridah Nassolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Virological Failure ◽  
Dried Blood Spots ◽  
Viral Load Suppression ◽  
First Line ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Weighted Prevalence

Abstract Objectives We implemented the WHO cross-sectional survey protocol to determine rates of HIV viral load (VL) suppression (VLS), and weighted prevalence, predictors and patterns of acquired drug resistance (ADR) in individuals with virological failure (VF) defined as VL ≥1000 copies/mL. Methods We enrolled 547 and 1064 adult participants on first-line ART for 12 (±3) months (ADR12) and ≥48 months (ADR48), respectively. Dried blood spots and plasma specimens were collected for VL testing and genotyping among the VFs. Results VLS was 95.0% (95% CI 93.4%–96.5%) in the ADR12 group and 87.9% (95% CI 85.0%–90.9%) in the ADR48 group. The weighted prevalence of ADR was 96.1% (95% CI 72.9%–99.6%) in the ADR12 and 90.4% (95% CI 73.6–96.8%) in the ADR48 group, out of the 30 and 95 successful genotypes in the respective groups. Initiation on a zidovudine-based regimen compared with a tenofovir-based regimen was significantly associated with VF in the ADR48 group; adjusted OR (AOR) 1.96 (95% CI 1.13–3.39). Independent predictors of ADR in the ADR48 group were initiation on a zidovudine-based regimen compared with tenofovir-based regimens, AOR 3.16 (95% CI 1.34–7.46) and ART duration of ≥82 months compared with &lt;82 months, AOR 1.92 (95% CI 1.03–3.59). Conclusions While good VLS was observed, the high prevalence of ADR among the VFs before they underwent the recommended three intensive adherence counselling (IAC) sessions followed by repeat VL testing implies that IAC prior to treatment switching may be of limited benefit in improving VLS.

scholarly journals Development of HIV drug resistance in a cohort of adults on first-line antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania during the stavudine era

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphael Z Sangeda ◽  
Perpétua Gómes ◽  
Soo-Yon Rhee ◽  
Fausta Mosha ◽  
Ricardo J. Camacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Nnrti Resistance ◽  
One Year ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor

Abstract As more HIV patients start combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) is inevitable. This will have consequences for the transmission of HIVDR, the success of ART, and the nature and trend of the epidemic. We recruited a cohort of 223 patients starting or continuing their first-line cART in Tanzania during the stavudine era in 2010. Patients were then followed up for one year. From those with a viral load test at baseline and follow-up time, 34% were failing virologically at the one-year endpoint. From 41 patients, protease and reverse transcriptase genotyping were successful. Eighteen samples were from therapy-naïve patients and 23 samples were taken under therapy either baseline for patients already under cART at study entry, or follow-up sample. The isolates were mostly subtype A, followed by C and D at 41.5%, 22% and 12.2% of the patients, respectively. No transmitted HIVDR was detected, as scored using the surveillance drug resistance mutations (DRMs) list. However, in 3 of the 18 samples from therapy-naïve patients, the clinical Rega interpretation algorithm scored 44D or 138A as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated polymorphisms. The most observed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation was 184V. The mutation was found in 16 patients causing resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine. Nineteen patients had NNRTI resistance mutations, the most common of which was 103N observed in 8 patients. These high levels of resistance calls for regular drug resistance surveillance in Tanzania to control the emergence and transmission of HIVDR.

scholarly journals Characterization of HIV-1 near Full-Length Proviral Genome Quasispecies from Patients with Undetectable Viral Load Undergoing First-Line HAART Therapy

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brunna M. Alves ◽  
Juliana D. Siqueira ◽  
Marianne M. Garrido ◽  
Ornella M. Botelho ◽  
Isabel M. Prellwitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Undetectable Viral Load ◽  
Hiv Treatment ◽  
Full Length ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Subtype B ◽  
Hiv 1

Increased access to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) by HIV+ individuals has become a reality worldwide. In Brazil, ART currently reaches over half of the HIV-infected subjects. In the context of a remarkable HIV-1 genetic variability, highly related variants, called quasispecies, are generated. HIV quasispecies generated during infection can influence virus persistence and pathogenicity, representing a challenge to treatment. However, the clinical relevance of minority quasispecies is still uncertain. For this study, we have determined the archived proviral sequences, viral subtype and drug resistance mutations from a cohort of HIV+ patients with undetectable viral load undergoing HAART as first-line therapy using next-generation sequencing for near full-length virus genome (NFLG) assembly. HIV-1 consensus sequences representing NFLG were obtained for eleven patients, while for another twelve varying genome coverage rates were obtained. Phylogenetic analysis showed the predominance of subtype B (83%; 19/23). Considering the minority variants, 18 patients carried archived virus harboring at least one mutation conferring antiretroviral resistance; for six patients, the mutations correlated with the current ARVs used. These data highlight the importance of monitoring HIV minority drug resistant variants and their clinical impact, to guide future regimen switches and improve HIV treatment success.

scholarly journals Development of HIV Drug Resistance in a Cohort of Adults on First-Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Tanzania during the Stavudine Era

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 847-861
Author(s):  
Raphael Z. Sangeda ◽  
Perpétua Gómes ◽  
Soo-Yon Rhee ◽  
Fausta Mosha ◽  
Ricardo J. Camacho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase ◽  
Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Transcriptase Inhibitor ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Nnrti Resistance ◽  
One Year ◽  
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor

As more HIV patients start combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the emergence of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) is inevitable. This will have consequences for the transmission of HIVDR, the success of ART, and the nature and trend of the epidemic. We recruited a cohort of 223 patients starting or continuing their first-line cART in Tanzania towards the end of the stavudine era in 2010. Patients were then followed for one year. Of those with a viral load test at baseline and follow-up time, 34% had a detectable viral load at the one-year endpoint. For 41 patients, protease and reverse transcriptase genotyping were successful. Eighteen samples were from cART-naïve patients, and 23 samples were taken under therapy either at baseline for cART-experienced patients or from follow-up samples for both cART–naïve and cART–experienced patients. The isolates were subtype A, followed by C and D in 41.5%, 22%, and 12.2% of the patients, respectively. No transmitted HIVDR was detected, as scored using the surveillance drug resistance mutations (DRMs) list. However, in 3 of the 18 samples from cART-naïve patients, the clinical Rega interpretation algorithm scored 44D or 138A as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated polymorphisms. The most observed nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutation was 184V. The mutation was found in 16 patients, causing resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine. Nineteen patients had NNRTI resistance mutations, the most common of which was 103N, observed in eight patients. These high levels of resistance call for regular drug resistance surveillance in Tanzania to inform the control of the emergence and transmission of HIVDR.

scholarly journals Virologic failure and HIV drug resistance on simplified, dolutegravir-based maintenance therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gilles Wandeler ◽  
Marta Buzzi ◽  
Nanina Anderegg ◽  
Delphine Sculier ◽  
Charles Béguelin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Resistance ◽  
Viral Load ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Virologic Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Undetectable Viral Load ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Hiv Viral Load ◽  
Acquired Drug Resistance

Background: Dolutegravir-containing maintenance therapy is a promising simplification strategy for virologically suppressed HIV-infected individuals. However, most of the available data to inform this strategy come from small, uncontrolled studies. We estimated the proportion of HIV-infected patients experiencing virological failure (VF) and developing drug resistance on dolutegravir (DTG)-based maintenance therapy. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and conference abstracts for studies assessing VF on DTG-based maintenance therapy. Studies including ≥5 adults with an undetectable viral load on antiretroviral therapy (ART) who switched to a DTG-based mono- or dual therapy were included. Pooled proportions of VF were estimated using random-intercept logistic meta-regression and acquired drug resistance mutations described for each strategy. Results: Of 1719 studies considered, 21 met our selection criteria, including seven interventional and 14 observational studies. Eight studies including 251 patients assessed VF on DTG monotherapy and fourteen studies including 1670 participants VF on dual therapy. The participant’s median age ranged from 43 to 63 years, their median nadir CD4 count from 90 to 399 cells/µl, and 27.6% were female. The proportion of participants experiencing VF on DTG-monotherapy was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-6.7) at 24 weeks and 8.9% (95% CI 4.7-16.2) at 48 weeks. Resistance mutations developed in seven (3.6%) participants on DTG-monotherapy. Among patients on dual therapy, ten (0.7%, 95% CI 0.4-1.3) experienced VF by 48 weeks and none developed resistance to DTG. In adjusted analyses, VF at 24 weeks was less likely on dual therapy than on monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio: 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.30). Conclusions: Whereas VF is relatively common on DTG maintenance monotherapy, DTG-based dual therapy appears to be a promising simplification strategy for individuals with a suppressed HIV viral load on triple-ART.

scholarly journals Predictors of Virological Failure and Time to Viral Suppression of First-Line Integrase Inhibitor–Based Antiretroviral Treatment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashima Pyngottu ◽  
Alexandra U Scherrer ◽  
Roger Kouyos ◽  
Michael Huber ◽  
Hans Hirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Viral Suppression ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Baseline Viral Load ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cd4 Counts ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) are recommended for first-line treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). We identified risk factors, including baseline minor InSTI resistance mutations, for treatment failure of InSTI-based regimens. Methods We studied time-to-treatment failure and time to viral suppression among 1419 drug-naive patients in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study. We performed Cox regression models adjusted for demographic factors, baseline HIV RNA/CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events, and the type of InSTI. In 646 patients with a baseline genotypic resistance test of the integrase, we studied the impact of minor integrase resistance mutations. Results We observed 121 virological failures during 18 447 person-years of follow-up. A baseline viral load ≥100 000 copies/mL (multivariable hazard ratio [mHR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3–3.6) and an AIDS-defining event (mHR, 1.8; 95% CI. 1.1–3.0) were associated with treatment failure. CD4 counts between 200 and 500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.5; 95% CI, .3–.8) and &gt;500 cells/µL (mHR, 0.4; 95% CI, .2–.7) were protective. Time to suppression was shorter in lower viral load strata (mHR, 0.7; 95% CI, .6–.8) and in dolutegravir-based therapy (mHR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0–1.4). Minor resistance mutations were found at baseline in 104 of 646 (16%) patients with no effect on treatment outcome. Conclusions Factors associated with treatment failure on InSTI-based first-line regimen remained similar to those of older treatments, in particular high viral load and low CD4 counts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document