scholarly journals Measuring Spinal Presynaptic Inhibition in Mice By Dorsal Root Potential Recording In Vivo

Author(s):  
Benedikt Grünewald ◽  
Christian Geis
2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (12) ◽  
pp. 4569-4582 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Di Maio ◽  
A. Skuba ◽  
B. T. Himes ◽  
S. L. Bhagat ◽  
J. K. Hyun ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e0192760
Author(s):  
Jason A. Bleedorn ◽  
Troy A. Hornberger ◽  
Craig A. Goodman ◽  
Zhengling Hao ◽  
Susannah J. Sample ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (8) ◽  
pp. 2118-2128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Sonner ◽  
David R. Ladle

Sensory feedback is critical for normal locomotion and adaptation to external perturbations during movement. Feedback provided by group Ia afferents influences motor output both directly through monosynaptic connections and indirectly through spinal interneuronal circuits. For example, the circuit responsible for reciprocal inhibition, which acts to prevent co-contraction of antagonist flexor and extensor muscles, is driven by Ia afferent feedback. Additionally, circuits mediating presynaptic inhibition can limit Ia afferent synaptic transmission onto central neuronal targets in a task-specific manner. These circuits can also be activated by stimulation of proprioceptive afferents. Rodent locomotion rapidly matures during postnatal development; therefore, we assayed the functional status of reciprocal and presynaptic inhibitory circuits of mice at birth and compared responses with observations made after 1 wk of postnatal development. Using extracellular physiological techniques from isolated and hemisected spinal cord preparations, we demonstrate that Ia afferent-evoked reciprocal inhibition is as effective at blocking antagonist motor neuron activation at birth as at 1 wk postnatally. In contrast, at birth conditioning stimulation of muscle nerve afferents failed to evoke presynaptic inhibition sufficient to block functional transmission at synapses between Ia afferents and motor neurons, even though dorsal root potentials could be evoked by stimulating the neighboring dorsal root. Presynaptic inhibition at this synapse was readily observed, however, at the end of the first postnatal week. These results indicate Ia afferent feedback from the periphery to central spinal circuits is only weakly gated at birth, which may provide enhanced sensitivity to peripheral feedback during early postnatal experiences.


Pain ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Chen ◽  
Qian Huang ◽  
Xiaodan Song ◽  
Neil C. Ford ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 860-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Wall ◽  
Malcolm Lidierth

Wall, Patrick D. and Malcolm Lidierth. Five sources of a dorsal root potential: their interactions and origins in the superficial dorsal horn. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 860–871, 1997. The dorsal root potential (DRP) was measured on the lumbar dorsal roots of urethan anesthetized rats and evoked by stimulation of five separate inputs. In some experiments, the dorsal cord potential was recorded simultaneously. Stimulation of the L3 dorsal root produced a DRP on the L2 dorsal root containing the six components observed in the cat including the prolonged negative wave (DRP V of Lloyd 1952 ). A single shock to the myelinated fibers in the sural nerve produced a DRP on the L6 dorsal root after the arrival in the cord of the afferent volley. The shape of this DRP was similar to that produced by dorsal root stimulation. Repetitive stimulation of the myelinated fibers in the gastrocnemius nerve also produced a prolonged negative DRP on the L6 dorsal root. When a single stimulus (<5 μA; 200 μs) was applied through a microelectrode to the superficial Lissauer Tract (LT) at the border of the L2 and L3 spinal segments, a characteristic prolonged negative DRP (LT-DRP) began on the L2 dorsal root after some 15 ms. Stimulation of the LT evoked DRPs bilaterally. Recordings on nearby dorsal roots showed this DRP to be unaccompanied by stimulation of afferent fibers in those roots. The LT-DRP was unaffected by neonatal capsaicin treatment that destroyed most unmyelinated fibers. Measurements of myelinated fiber terminal excitability to microstimulation showed that the LT-DRP was accompanied by primary afferent depolarization. Repetitive stimulation through a microelectrode in sensorimotor cortex provoked a prolonged and delayed negative DRP (recorded L2–L4). Stimulation in the cortical arm area and recording on cervical dorsal roots showed that the DRP was evoked more from motor areas than sensory areas of cortex. Interactions were observed between the LT-DRP and that evoked from the sural or gastrocnemius nerves or motor cortex. The LT-DRP was inhibited by preceding stimulation of the other three sources but LT stimulation did not inhibit DRPs evoked from sural or gastrocnemius nerves on the L6 dorsal root or from motor cortex on the L3 root. However, LT stimulation did inhibit the DRP evoked by a subsequent Lissaeur tract stimulus. Recordings were made from superficial dorsal horn neurons. Covergence of input from LT sural, and gastrocnemius nerves and cortex was observed. Spike-triggered averaging was used to examine the relationship between the ongoing discharge of superficial dorsal horn neurons and the spontaneous DRP. The discharge of 81% of LT responsive cells was correlated with the DRP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document