scholarly journals Experimental Measurement of Settling Velocity of Spherical Particles in Unconfined and Confined Surfactant-based Shear Thinning Viscoelastic Fluids

10.3791/50749 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sahil Malhotra ◽  
Mukul M. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Measurement ◽  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Viscoelastic Fluids ◽  
Shear Thinning ◽  
Spherical Particles

Settling Velocity of Particles in Viscoelastic Fluids: A Comparison of the Shear-Viscosity and Elasticity Effects

SPE Journal ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (05) ◽  
pp. 1689-1705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumanth Kumar Arnipally ◽  
Ergun Kuru
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Properties ◽  
Shear Viscosity ◽  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Particle Diameter ◽  
Viscoelastic Fluids ◽  
Spherical Particles ◽  
High Shear ◽  
Fluid Shear ◽  
Particle Settling ◽  
Fluid Elasticity

Summary The objective of this paper is to determine how fluid shear viscosity and elasticity might influence the particle-settling velocity, and even more so to answer the question of which one of these two rheological properties is more dominant in controlling the particle-settling velocity when viscoelastic drilling fluids are used. The settling velocities of spherical particles (diameters: 1.18, 1.5, 2, and 3 mm) in partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) polymer fluids were measured using the particle-image-shadow graph (PIS) technique. Two sets of test fluids were formulated by mixing three different grades of HPAM (molecular weights of 500,000, 8 million, and 20 million g/g mol) at polymer concentrations of 0.09, 0.05, and 0.03 wt%. The shear-viscosity and elasticity characteristics of test fluids were determined by performing shear-viscosity and frequency-sweep oscillatory measurements, respectively. The first set of fluids had almost identical shear-viscosity characteristics while showing significantly different elastic properties (quantified in terms of relaxation time). The second set of fluids had similar elastic properties but different shear-viscosity characteristics. In addition, the effect of the particle size on the settling velocities in these test fluids was also investigated. The experimentally measured settling velocities were compared with the values calculated from the Shah et al. (2007) model developed for predicting the settling velocity of spherical particles in power-law (viscoinelastic) fluids as well as the values calculated from the Malhotra and Sharma (2012) correlation developed for settling velocity in shear-thinning viscoelastic fluids in unconfined media. Experimental results showed the following: When the fluids with similar shear-viscosity profiles were used, the settling velocity of spherical particles decreased significantly with the increasing fluid elasticity. The settling-velocity values can be 14 to 50 times overestimated if the effect of the elasticity is not considered. At constant elasticity, the settling velocity of spherical particles also decreased significantly when the fluid shear viscosity was increased. The spherical particle-settling velocity increased pronouncedly as particle diameter increased from 1.18 to 3 mm. However, the magnitude of the increase in settling velocity with the increasing particle diameter is less for the samples with higher elasticity and similar shear-viscosity characteristics. The fluid shear viscosity and the elasticity both seem to have significant effect on the particle-settling velocity. However, from the field operational point of view, fluids with high shear-viscosity values are not always practical to use because the high shear viscosity increases parasitic pressure losses and potentially has a negative effect on the drilling rate. Hence, in such cases increasing the fluid elasticity can help to reduce the particle-settling velocity even at lower shear-viscosity values. By conducting experiments under controlled conditions, we were able to quantify the individual effects of fluid shear viscosity and elasticity on the particle-settling velocity for the first time in drilling literature.

Settling Behavior of Particles in Bubble Containing Newtonian Fluids: Experimental Study and Model Development

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silin Jing ◽  
Xianzhi Song ◽  
Zhaopeng Zhu ◽  
Buwen Yu ◽  
Shiming Duan
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Number ◽  
Drag Coefficient ◽  
Volume Concentration ◽  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Particle Density ◽  
Particle Diameter ◽  
Newtonian Fluids ◽  
Spherical Particles ◽  
Bubble Volume ◽  
Particle Reynolds Number

Abstract Accurate description of cuttings slippage in the gas-liquid phase is of great significance for wellbore cleaning and the control accuracy of bottom hole pressure during MPD. In this study, the wellbore bubble flow environment was simulated by a constant pressure air pump and the transparent wellbore, and the settling characteristics of spherical particles under different gas volume concentrations were recorded and analyzed by highspeed photography. A total of 225 tests were conducted to analyze the influence of particle diameter (1–12mm), particle density (2700–7860kg/m^3), liquid viscosity and bubble volume concentration on particle settling velocity. Gas drag force is defined to quantitatively evaluate the bubble’s resistance to particle slippage. The relationship between bubble drag coefficient and particle Reynolds number is obtained by fitting the experimental results. An explicit settling velocity equation is established by introducing Archimedes number. This explicit equation with an average relative error of only 8.09% can directly predict the terminal settling velocity of the sphere in bubble containing Newtonian fluids. The models for predicting bubble drag coefficient and the terminal settling velocity are valid with particle Reynolds number ranging from 0.05 to 167 and bubble volume concentration ranging from 3.0% to 20.0%. Besides, a trial-and-error procedure and an illustrative example are presented to show how to calculate bubble drag coefficient and settling velocity in bubble containing fluids. The results of this study will provide the theoretical basis for wellbore cleaning and accurate downhole pressure to further improve the performance of MPD in treating gas influx.

Closure to “Settling Velocity of Spherical Particles in Calm Water”

1982 ◽  
Vol 108 (12) ◽  
pp. 1548-1549
Author(s):  
Jean L. Boillat ◽  
Walter H. Graf
Keyword(s):  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Spherical Particles ◽  
Calm Water

Settling Velocity of Spherical Particles in Calm Water

1981 ◽  
Vol 107 (10) ◽  
pp. 1123-1131
Author(s):  
Jean L. Boillat ◽  
Walter H. Graf
Keyword(s):  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Spherical Particles ◽  
Calm Water

scholarly journals Study of bovine sperm motility in shear-thinning viscoelastic fluids

2019 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toru Hyakutake ◽  
Koichi Sato ◽  
Kenta Sugita
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Motility ◽  
Viscoelastic Fluids ◽  
Shear Thinning ◽  
Bovine Sperm

scholarly journals Sedimentation of finite-size spheres in quiescent and turbulent environments

2016 ◽  
Vol 788 ◽  
pp. 640-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Fornari ◽  
Francesco Picano ◽  
Luca Brandt
Keyword(s):  
Turbulent Flow ◽  
Settling Velocity ◽  
Solid Phase ◽  
Density Ratio ◽  
Finite Size ◽  
Spherical Particles ◽  
Volume Fractions ◽  
Turbulent Environments ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Quiescent Fluid

Sedimentation of a dispersed solid phase is widely encountered in applications and environmental flows, yet little is known about the behaviour of finite-size particles in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. To fill this gap, we perform direct numerical simulations of sedimentation in quiescent and turbulent environments using an immersed boundary method to account for the dispersed rigid spherical particles. The solid volume fractions considered are ${\it\phi}=0.5{-}1\,\%$, while the solid to fluid density ratio ${\it\rho}_{p}/{\it\rho}_{f}=1.02$. The particle radius is chosen to be approximately six Kolmogorov length scales. The results show that the mean settling velocity is lower in an already turbulent flow than in a quiescent fluid. The reductions with respect to a single particle in quiescent fluid are approximately 12 % and 14 % for the two volume fractions investigated. The probability density function of the particle velocity is almost Gaussian in a turbulent flow, whereas it displays large positive tails in quiescent fluid. These tails are associated with the intermittent fast sedimentation of particle pairs in drafting–kissing–tumbling motions. The particle lateral dispersion is higher in a turbulent flow, whereas the vertical one is, surprisingly, of comparable magnitude as a consequence of the highly intermittent behaviour observed in the quiescent fluid. Using the concept of mean relative velocity we estimate the mean drag coefficient from empirical formulae and show that non-stationary effects, related to vortex shedding, explain the increased reduction in mean settling velocity in a turbulent environment.

Fall of Spherical Particles in Viscoelastic Fluids

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaroslav Strnadel ◽  
Ivan Machač ◽  
Martin Zatloukal
Keyword(s):  
Viscoelastic Fluids ◽  
Spherical Particles
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document