scholarly journals An overview of recent advances in duplex DNA recognition by small molecules

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 1051-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayantan Bhaduri ◽  
Nihar Ranjan ◽  
Dev P Arya

As the carrier of genetic information, the DNA double helix interacts with many natural ligands during the cell cycle, and is amenable to such intervention in diseases such as cancer biogenesis. Proteins bind DNA in a site-specific manner, not only distinguishing between the geometry of the major and minor grooves, but also by making close contacts with individual bases within the local helix architecture. Over the last four decades, much research has been reported on the development of small non-natural ligands as therapeutics to either block, or in some cases, mimic a DNA–protein interaction of interest. This review presents the latest findings in the pursuit of novel synthetic DNA binders. This article provides recent coverage of major strategies (such as groove recognition, intercalation and cross-linking) adopted in the duplex DNA recognition by small molecules, with an emphasis on major works of the past few years.

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Lavery

It has become clear that there is no simple ‘code’ for protein–DNA recognition and that selecting an optimal binding sequence along the DNA double helix corresponds to more than simply forming a set of specific hydrogen bonds or steric interactions. However, it has been difficult to characterize the so-called indirect components of recognition. While DNA deformation certainly underlies indirect recognition, it is not easy to determine how local fine structure and deformability depend on base sequence or exactly what percentage of recognition should be attributed to such factors. Molecular modelling can help to develop these ideas into a quantitative model, provided the calculations can be carried out fast enough to enable a comprehensive survey of base-sequence effects. I present here some recent results from our group and their consequences for improving our understanding of protein–DNA binding, and their potential for predicting, and eventually modulating, protein–DNA binding.


Author(s):  
D.P. Bazett-Jones ◽  
F.P. Ottensmeyer

Dark field electron microscopy has been used for the study of the structure of individual macromolecules with a resolution to at least the 5Å level. The use of this technique has been extended to the investigation of structure of interacting molecules, particularly the interaction between DNA and fish protamine, a class of basic nuclear proteins of molecular weight 4,000 daltons.Protamine, which is synthesized during spermatogenesis, binds to chromatin, displaces the somatic histones and wraps up the DNA to fit into the small volume of the sperm head. It has been proposed that protamine, existing as an extended polypeptide, winds around the minor groove of the DNA double helix, with protamine's positively-charged arginines lining up with the negatively-charged phosphates of DNA. However, viewing protamine as an extended protein is inconsistent with the results obtained in our laboratory.


2004 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 715-747 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miroslav Fojta

This review is devoted to applications of mercury electrodes in the electrochemical analysis of nucleic acids and in studies of DNA structure and interactions. At the mercury electrodes, nucleic acids yield faradaic signals due to redox processes involving adenine, cytosine and guanine residues, and tensammetric signals due to adsorption/desorption of polynucleotide chains at the electrode surface. Some of these signals are highly sensitive to DNA structure, providing information about conformation changes of the DNA double helix, formation of DNA strand breaks as well as covalent or non-covalent DNA interactions with small molecules (including genotoxic agents, drugs, etc.). Measurements at mercury electrodes allow for determination of small quantities of unmodified or electrochemically labeled nucleic acids. DNA-modified mercury electrodes have been used as biodetectors for DNA damaging agents or as detection electrodes in DNA hybridization assays. Mercury film and solid amalgam electrodes possess similar features in the nucleic acid analysis to mercury drop electrodes. On the contrary, intrinsic (label-free) DNA electrochemical responses at other (non-mercury) solid electrodes cannot provide information about small changes of the DNA structure. A review with 188 references.


1989 ◽  
Vol 264 (14) ◽  
pp. 7921-7935
Author(s):  
R V Gessner ◽  
C A Frederick ◽  
G J Quigley ◽  
A Rich ◽  
A H J Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document