scholarly journals The effects of delay of reward on negative contrast effects associated with reductions in reward magnitude

1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
John N. Moore ◽  
James H. McHose
1973 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitri E. Shanab ◽  
Larry O. Rouse ◽  
Gerald Cavallaro

1978 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 363-366
Author(s):  
James H. McHose ◽  
John N. Moore

1969 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Sgro ◽  
Robert A. Glotfelty ◽  
James A. Podlesni

1980 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. Fagen ◽  
Robert F. Rycek

1976 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 541-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Wookey

Recent evidence concerning successive incentive contrast suggests the occurrence of both positive and negative contrast effects under both non-transfer and transfer conditions. There are three types of explanation for these contrast effects, based on frustration theory, sequential theory and adaptation level theory (perceptual accounts). One of the critical experiments favouring perceptual accounts, Collier and Marx (1959), is subject to a number of methodological criticisms. This experiment was repeated, with modifications to take account of these criticisms, and extended to include transfer, as well as non-transfer, conditions. There was no evidence of contrast. In a further experiment using Collier and Marx's procedure with lever pressing and panel pushing, positive and negative, transfer and non-transfer effects were found using Noyes pellets rather than sucrose as reward. It is suggested that these results contribute some support to perceptual accounts of incentive contrast, although no present theory is entirely satisfactory.


Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 340 (6136) ◽  
pp. 1084-1086 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. McNamara ◽  
T. W. Fawcett ◽  
A. I. Houston

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document