scholarly journals A further application of composite-stimulus control in additive summation

1977 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Yuan Tsai ◽  
Stanley J. Weiss
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Additive Summation

Stimulus Control of Free-Operant Avoidance: An Investigation of Response

1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley J. Weiss ◽  
Charles E. Cunningham ◽  
M. Catherine Bushnell
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Free Operant Avoidance ◽  
Operant Avoidance ◽  
Free Operant

Joint stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Pinto ◽  
Inês Fortes ◽  
Armando Machado
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Discrimination Task ◽  
Temporal Discrimination

Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli.

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Wasserman ◽  
Andrea J. Frank ◽  
Michael E. Young
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Visual Stimuli

State-Dependent Stimulus Control: Cueing Attributes of Ethanol "Hangover" in Rats

1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1210-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
David V. Gauvin ◽  
Kevin L. Goulden ◽  
Frank A. Holloway
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
State Dependent

Inhibitory Conditioning Resulting from a Reduction in the Magnitude of Reinforcement

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (3b) ◽  
pp. 163-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Cotton ◽  
Glyn Goodall ◽  
N. J. Mackintosh
Keyword(s):  
Stimulus Control ◽  
Shock Intensity ◽  
Conditioned Suppression ◽  
Summation Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Conditioned Inhibitor ◽  
Inhibitory Conditioning ◽  
Experimental Subjects ◽  
The Difference

Five experiments, all employing conditioned suppression in rats, studied inhibitory conditioning to a stimulus signalling a reduction in shock intensity. Experimental subjects were conditioned to a tone signalling a 1·0 mA shock and to a tone-light compound signalling a 0·4 mA shock. On a summation test in which it alleviated the suppression maintained by a third stimulus also associated with the 1·0 mA shock, the light was established as a conditioned inhibitor. Retardation tests gave ambiguous results: the light was relatively slow to condition when paired, either alone or in conjunction with another stimulus, with the 0·4 mA shock, but the difference from a novel stimulus control group was not significant. Two final experiments found no evidence at all of inhibition on a summation test in which the light was presented in conjunction with a stimulus that had itself been associated with the 0·4 mA shock. The results of these experiments have implications for the question of what animals learn during the course of inhibitory conditioning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document