scholarly journals Human eyelid conditioning with paraorbital shock as the US

1971 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Gormezano ◽  
C. D. Fernald
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
The Us

Blocking observed in human eyelid conditioning

1991 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Martin ◽  
Archie B. Levey
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning

scholarly journals Temporal Patterns of Inputs to Cerebellum Necessary and Sufficient for Trace Eyelid Conditioning

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 627-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Kalmbach ◽  
Tatsuya Ohyama ◽  
Michael D. Mauk
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Granule Cells ◽  
Mossy Fiber ◽  
Mossy Fibers ◽  
Trace Conditioning ◽  
Trace Interval ◽  
The Us ◽  
Conditioned Responses ◽  
Necessary And Sufficient ◽  
Stimulation Of

Trace eyelid conditioning is a form of associative learning that requires several forebrain structures and cerebellum. Previous work suggests that at least two conditioned stimulus (CS)-driven signals are available to the cerebellum via mossy fiber inputs during trace conditioning: one driven by and terminating with the tone and a second driven by medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) that persists through the stimulus-free trace interval to overlap in time with the unconditioned stimulus (US). We used electric stimulation of mossy fibers to determine whether this pattern of dual inputs is necessary and sufficient for cerebellar learning to express normal trace eyelid responses. We find that presenting the cerebellum with one input that mimics persistent activity observed in mPFC and the lateral pontine nuclei during trace eyelid conditioning and another that mimics tone-elicited mossy fiber activity is sufficient to produce responses whose properties quantitatively match trace eyelid responses using a tone. Probe trials with each input delivered separately provide evidence that the cerebellum learns to respond to the mPFC-like input (that overlaps with the US) and learns to suppress responding to the tone-like input (that does not). This contributes to precisely timed responses and the well-documented influence of tone offset on the timing of trace responses. Computer simulations suggest that the underlying cerebellar mechanisms involve activation of different subsets of granule cells during the tone and during the stimulus-free trace interval. These results indicate that tone-driven and mPFC-like inputs are necessary and sufficient for the cerebellum to learn well-timed trace conditioned responses.

scholarly journals Drive times habit in human eyelid conditioning

1966 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 155-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
William F. Prokasy ◽  
Charles K. Allen
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning

Sequence of response development in human eyelid conditioning.

1974 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 678-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archie B. Levey ◽  
Irene Martin
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning

scholarly journals Cross-modal generalization to tone and light in human eyelid conditioning

1966 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Marlatt ◽  
D. Lilie ◽  
B. D. Selvidge ◽  
M. D. Sipes ◽  
I. Gormezano
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning

scholarly journals Warning signal as a component of a compound stimulus in human eyelid conditioning

1967 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 541-542
Author(s):  
Jonathan Berman ◽  
Carl D. Williams ◽  
Neil Schneiderman
Keyword(s):  
Eyelid Conditioning ◽  
Compound Stimulus ◽  
Warning Signal ◽  
Human Eyelid Conditioning
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document