scholarly journals The set-size effect in personality impression formation is not an artifact

1974 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irwin P. Levin ◽  
Martin F. Kaplan
Author(s):  
Paul Kohn ◽  
Peter Waxer ◽  
Kyle Baumanis ◽  
Robin Ruggles

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
K. S. Frieder ◽  
M. Carrasco

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3365 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1095-1105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Sakai

I measured the difference threshold for contour curvature in short-term visual memory (STVM) using a two-interval forced-choice partial discrimination task. In experiments 1 and 2, the study stimulus consisting of 1 to 4 curved contours was briefly presented. It was followed by a single contour stimulus after a retention interval. The subjects judged if the test stimulus had a higher or lower curvature than the corresponding study contour. The results of experiment 1 showed that the Weber fraction increased monotonically with increasing set size. The results of experiment 2 clarified that the set-size effect was not due to a temporal limitation in encoding resulting from the short exposure time. In experiment 3, the study stimuli always consisted of 4 items, but the numbers of memorised items were different in each condition. Nevertheless, the results showed the set-size effect, which indicated that its occurrence depended largely on the capacity limitation in short-term visual memory (STVM) storage. Otherwise, the Weber fraction was not hugely higher for set size 4 compared with set size 1. It was concluded that only 1 object could be retained in STVM with high fidelity, but that at least 4 objects could be retained in STVM with some degree of fidelity.


1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 201-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Algarabel ◽  
Juan Carlos Ruiz

The effect of set size indicates that recall of a word is greater when its cue is associated with fewer words. This study was designed to replicate this result with lexical decisions of 18 students. In spite of obtaining the set-size effect with cue recall, it was not observed with lexical decision.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document