scholarly journals Children’s use of category-size information for the retrieval of information

1979 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla J. Springer
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 370-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Alba ◽  
Walter Chromiak ◽  
Lynn Hasher ◽  
Mary S. Attig

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie A. Obrecht ◽  
Gretchen B. Chapman ◽  
Rochel Gelman

2015 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Pytel ◽  
Alejandro Hossian ◽  
Paola Britos ◽  
Ramón García-Martínez

2016 ◽  
Vol 118 (7) ◽  
pp. 1579-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Pereira Machado ◽  
Mariana Vieira dos Santos Kraemer ◽  
Nathalie Kliemann ◽  
Cláudia Flemming Colussi ◽  
Marcela Boro Veiros ◽  
...  

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse and compare the serving sizes and energy values reported on the nutrition information of all processed and ultra-processed dairy products in their regular and diet/light versions available for sale in a large supermarket in Brazil. Design/methodology/approach – A check was done for associations between the compliance of reported serving sizes, energy values per serving and energy density for regular foods and foods advertised at “diet/light” (with reduced fat and calories). Findings – The data included information from 451 dairy product labels. Most of the products had serving sizes smaller than the reference set by Brazilian law. A high variability of serving sizes was found for similar products. “Diet/light” foods tend to report serving sizes that are even smaller and more inadequate. Moreover, the energy density of these products was similar to that of the regular foods. Smaller serving sizes may be being presented on “diet/light” foods in order to report lower energy values and on similar foods to show non-existent differences in energy values. These results point to the importance of standardizing serving size information on food labels so that consumers have access to clear and accurate information about food products. Originality/value – This was the first census-type study to analyse the serving size information of dairy products at a supermarket of one of the ten largest supermarket chains in Brazil. This work extends the scope of current food labelling and contributes to the discussion about how nutrition labelling has been presented to Brazilian consumers and its possible consequences for food choices and the guarantee of consumer rights.


Author(s):  
Douglas L. Nelson ◽  
Maria-Teresa Bajo ◽  
Cathy L. McEvoy ◽  
Thomas A. Schreiber

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen B.J. Smeets ◽  
Erik Kleijn ◽  
Marlijn van der Meijden ◽  
Eli Brenner

AbstractThere is an extensive literature debating whether perceived size is used to guide grasping. A possible reason for not using judged size is that using judged positions might lead to more precise movements. As this argument does not hold for small objects, and all studies showing an effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping used small objects, we hypothesized that size information is used for small objects but not for large ones. Using a modified diagonal illusion, we obtained an effect of about 10% on perceptual judgements, without an effect on grasping, irrespective of object size. We therefore reject our precision hypothesis. We discuss the results in the framework of grasping as moving digits to positions on an object. We conclude that the reported disagreement on the effect of illusions is because the Ebbinghaus illusion not only affects size, but –unlike most size illusions– also affects perceived positions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document