scholarly journals The influence of stimulus incongruity on the familiarity effect in visual selection

1971 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry T. Faw ◽  
Jum C. Nunnally
1978 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Charles Lemond

A consistent finding in the literature concerning visual selection is that subjects spend more time viewing unfamiliar stimuli than familial stimuli. In the present investigation a procedure to measure competitive viewing times to familiar and unfamiliar stimuli was used. Results of the analyses of viewing times showed that the magnitude of the familiarity effect was a positive function of the duration of stimulus pre-exposure. In addition no differences were found in subjects' “preference” for familiar and unfamiliar stimuli as measured by “like-dislike” ratings.


2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Olma ◽  
T Donner ◽  
A Kettermann ◽  
A Kraft ◽  
W Sommer ◽  
...  

Perception ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 030100662110140
Author(s):  
Xingchen Zhou ◽  
A. M. Burton ◽  
Rob Jenkins

One of the best-known phenomena in face recognition is the other-race effect, the observation that own-race faces are better remembered than other-race faces. However, previous studies have not put the magnitude of other-race effect in the context of other influences on face recognition. Here, we compared the effects of (a) a race manipulation (own-race/other-race face) and (b) a familiarity manipulation (familiar/unfamiliar face) in a 2 × 2 factorial design. We found that the familiarity effect was several times larger than the race effect in all performance measures. However, participants expected race to have a larger effect on others than it actually did. Face recognition accuracy depends much more on whether you know the person’s face than whether you share the same race.


1999 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 182-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R. Cave
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document