scholarly journals Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory

1994 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 525-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
William von Hippel ◽  
Chris Hawkins
Keyword(s):  
Exposure Time ◽  
Stimulus Exposure ◽  
Perceptual Memory

Stimulus exposure time as a factor in serial learning in an aged sample.

1963 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 594-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Eisdorfer ◽  
Seymour Axelrod ◽  
Francis L. Wilkie
Keyword(s):  
Exposure Time ◽  
Serial Learning ◽  
Stimulus Exposure ◽  
Aged Sample

Choice Behavior as a Function of Stimulus Exposure

1967 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L. Pate
Keyword(s):  
Exposure Time ◽  
Choice Behavior ◽  
Stimulus Exposure ◽  
Similar Stimulus ◽  
Choice Latency

Two studies which showed significant extra-maze pre-exposure effects are reported. In Exp. 1 hooded rats were exposed to one stimulus and then given a choice between that stimulus and a non-exposed stimulus. Exposure brightness and exposure time were varied and number of changes between the two stimulus areas and time spent in each area were measured. In Exp. 2 rats were exposed to a stimulus and then given a choice between the same area, an area with a similar stimulus and an area with a dissimilar stimulus. Both exposure brightness and exposure time affected choice latency and time in the dissimilar area.

Changes in Lingual Sensitivity as a Function of Age and Stimulus Exposure Time

1982 ◽  
Vol 55 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1083-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Petrosino ◽  
Donald Fucci ◽  
Randall R. Robey
Keyword(s):  
Young Adult ◽  
Exposure Time ◽  
Stimulus Duration ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Group ◽  
Vibrotactile Threshold ◽  
Stimulus Exposure ◽  
Adult Group ◽  
Vibrotactile Thresholds

Effects of duration of stimulus exposure on lingual vibrotactile thresholds were examined across three groups of 10 subjects each ( n = 30). Subjects were grouped according to age (child group, mean age = 10.1 yr.; young adult group, mean age = 21.9 yr.; elderly group, mean age = 76.0 yr.). Lingual vibrotactile threshold measurements were obtained for all subjects under 5 conditions of exposure (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 sec.). Results showed statistically significant differences in threshold among all three age groups. As age increased, thresholds of lingual sensitivity increased (became poorer). Stimulus duration also created significant differences in threshold for all age groups. As stimulus duration increased, thresholds of lingual sensitivity decreased (became better). The children appeared to be the most stable across conditions whereas the elderly group appeared to be the most affected by stimulus duration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document