Memory trace strength and response biasing in short-term motor memory

1975 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Stelmach ◽  
J. A. Scott Kelso
1970 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Stelmach ◽  
Julie L. Barber

Retention of kinesthetic information from blind positioning responses was examined for 56 Ss. During a 30-sec. retention interval, half of the Ss sat quietly with their hands on the lever; the other half learned an interpolated target which required an antagonistic response. Both conditions showed significant amounts of forgetting. The mean differences between conditions as well as the differences between correlation coefficients across retention intervals were not significant. The results were consistent with memory-trace decay predictions.


1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip H. Marshall ◽  
Susan L. Wyatt ◽  
Shirley A. Moore ◽  
Stephen E. Sigman

An investigation was conducted to ascertain the influence of the duration of the time interval between successive repetitions of a discrete motor movement in a short-term motor memory paradigm. With one repetition a long interval increased error relative to a short interval. The opposite was true for seven repetitions; a long interval improved accuracy. The results were discussed in terms of the “trace shrinkage” hypothesis and compared with those from similar studies using verbal responses.


1976 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Stelmach ◽  
J. A. Scott Kelso ◽  
Penny Dorrance McCullagh
Keyword(s):  

1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laird S. Cermak ◽  
Barbara Uhly

10 amnesic alcoholic Korsakoff patients were compared with 10 chronic alcoholics for their ability to retain a simple motor movement over either a 10- or 20-sec. interval. During this interval the opportunity for rehearsal was minimized by having the patients engage in either a verbal or a motor distractor task. Under both conditions the Korsakoff patients were impaired relative to the control subjects, with very little difference between the two types of interference. It was concluded that Korsakoff patients have a short-term motor retention deficit that cannot be explained simply as an inability to mediate the task verbally.


1977 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph D. Hagman ◽  
Evelyn Williams

A retroactive interference paradigm was used to determine whether kinesthetic distance, location, or distance and location cues are used at recall of a blind, simple linear movement. Students performed interpolated movements which varied distance and location cues separately or jointly. Relative to a rest condition, joint distance and location interpolation produced significant interference while no significant interference was found for interpolation of individual distance or location. The results were interpreted as supporting the involvement of multiple kinesthetic cues in the establishment of memorial representations of motor movements.


1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy Pezdek ◽  
Chantal Roe
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document