Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: Perception delayed is automaticity denied

Derek Besner; Evan F. Risko

doi:10.3758/bf03196371

Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: Perception delayed is automaticity denied

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review ◽

10.3758/bf03196371 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 12 (2) ◽

pp. 271-275 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Derek Besner ◽

Evan F. Risko

Keyword(s):

Stimulus Response ◽

Response Compatible

Download Full-text

Effect of Visual-Verbal Load and Spatial Compatibility on Stimulus Response

Psychological Reports ◽

10.2466/22.pr0.108.2.487-502 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 108 (2) ◽

pp. 487-502

Author(s):

Wei-Shin Huang ◽

Chau-Chyun Liu ◽

Chun-Chia Hsu ◽

Ching-Huei Lai

Keyword(s):

Auditory Stimulus ◽

Visual Stimulus ◽

Memory Task ◽

Irrelevant Stimulus ◽

Force Load ◽

Manual Response ◽

Stimulus Response ◽

Response Task ◽

Response Compatible ◽

The Right

This study examined the effects of visual-verbal load (as measured by a visually presented reading-memory task with three levels) on a visual/auditory stimulus-response task. The three levels of load were defined as follows: “No Load” meant no other stimuli were presented concurrently; “Free Load” meant that a letter (A, B, C, or D) appeared at the same time as the visual or auditory stimulus; and “Force Load” was the same as “Free Load,” but the participants were also instructed to count how many times the letter A appeared. The stimulus-response task also had three levels: “irrelevant,” “compatible,” and “incompatible” spatial conditions. These required different key-pressing responses. The visual stimulus was a red ball presented either to the left or to the right of the display screen, and the auditory stimulus was a tone delivered from a position similar to that of the visual stimulus. Participants also processed an irrelevant stimulus. The results indicated that participants perceived auditory stimuli earlier than visual stimuli and reacted faster under stimulus-response compatible conditions. These results held even under a high visual-verbal load. These findings suggest the following guidelines for systems used in driving: an auditory source, appropriately compatible signal and manual-response positions, and a visually simplified background.

Download Full-text

Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus–response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli

Psychological Research ◽

10.1007/s00426-009-0228-0 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 74 (2) ◽

pp. 172-181 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Akio Nishimura ◽

Kazuhiko Yokosawa

Keyword(s):

Response Compatibility ◽

Stimulus Response ◽

Stimulus Response Compatibility ◽

Response Compatible

Download Full-text

The Effect of Real-Time Feedback Using a Smartwatch on the Clinical Behavior of Novice Student Clinicians

Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups ◽

10.1044/persp2.sig11.79 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (11) ◽

pp. 79-90

Author(s):

Courtney G. Scott ◽

Trina M. Becker ◽

Kenneth O. Simpson

Keyword(s):

Real Time ◽

Rating Scales ◽

Qualitative Interviews ◽

Communication Disorders ◽

Preliminary Evidence ◽

Single Subject ◽

Clinical Behavior ◽

Stimulus Response ◽

Treatment Data ◽

Computer Monitors

The use of computer monitors to provide technology-based written feedback during clinical sessions, referred to as “bug-in-the-eye” (BITi) feedback, recently emerged in the literature with preliminary evidence to support its effectiveness (Carmel, Villatte, Rosenthal, Chalker & Comtois, 2015; Weck et al., 2016). This investigation employed a single-subject, sequential A-B design with two participants to observe the effects of implementing BITi feedback using a smartwatch on the clinical behavior of student clinicians (SCs). Baseline and treatment data on the stimulus-response-consequence (S-R-C) contingency completion rates of SCs were collected using 10 minute segments of recorded therapy sessions. All participants were students enrolled in a clinical practicum experience in a communication disorders and sciences (CDS) program. A celeration line, descriptive statistics, and stability band were used to analyze the data by slope, trend, and variability. Results demonstrated a significant correlative relationship between BITi feedback with a smartwatch and an increase in positive clinical behaviors. Based on qualitative interviews and exit rating scales, SCs reported BITi feedback was noninvasive and minimally distracting. Preliminary evidence suggests BITi feedback with a smartwatch may be an effective tool for providing real-time clinical feedback.

Download Full-text