scholarly journals Priming effects on temporal order judgments about words: Perceived temporal priority or response bias?

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan R. Burnham ◽  
James H. Neely ◽  
Patrick A. O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Response Bias ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Priming Effects ◽  
Temporal Priority ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

Dichotic Temporal Order Judgments in Dyslexic and Nondyslexic Adults

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harvey Babkoff ◽  
Elisheva Ben-Artzi ◽  
Leah Fostick
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

Time changes: Temporal contexts support event segmentation in associative memory

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent van de Ven ◽  
Moritz Jaeckels ◽  
Peter De Weerd
Keyword(s):  
Associative Memory ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgment ◽  
Temporal Context ◽  
Temporal Acuity ◽  
Event Segmentation ◽  
Standard Interval ◽  
Test Items ◽  
Time Changes ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

We tend to mentally segment a series of events according to perceptual contextual changes, such that items from a shared context are more strongly associated in memory than items from different contexts. It is also known that temporal context provides a scaffold to structure experiences in memory, but its role in event segmentation has not been investigated. We adapted a previous paradigm, which was used to investigate event segmentation using visual contexts, to study the effects of changes in temporal contexts on event segmentation in associative memory. We presented lists of items in which the inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) ranged across lists between 0.5 and 4 s in 0.5 s steps. After each set of six lists, participants judged which one of two test items were shown first (temporal order judgment) for items that were either drawn from the same list or from consecutive lists. Further, participants judged from memory whether the ISI associated to an item lasted longer than a standard interval (2.25s) that was not previously shown. Results showed faster responses for temporal order judgments when items were drawn from the same context, as opposed to items drawn from different contexts. Further, we found that participants were well able to provide temporal duration judgments based on recalled durations. Finally, we found temporal acuity, as estimated by psychometric curve fitting parameters of the recalled durations, correlated inversely with within-list temporal order judgments. These findings show that changes in temporal context support event segmentation in associative memory.

scholarly journals Overlapping but Divergent Neural Correlates Underpinning Audiovisual Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Love ◽  
Karin Petrini ◽  
Cyril R. Pernet ◽  
Marianne Latinus ◽  
Frank E. Pollick
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Neural Correlates ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

scholarly journals A Psychophysical Investigation of Differences between Synchrony and Temporal Order Judgments

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e54798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Love ◽  
Karin Petrini ◽  
Adam Cheng ◽  
Frank E. Pollick
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

scholarly journals The effect of motion on tactile and visual temporal order judgments

2003 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
James C. Craig ◽  
Thomas A. Busey
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

scholarly journals Biased temporal order judgments in chronic neglect influenced by trunk position

Cortex ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 273-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Rorden ◽  
Dongyun Li ◽  
Hans-Otto Karnath
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Trunk Position ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

EXPRESS: Is the attentional SNARC effect truly attentional? Using temporal order judgments to differentiate attention from response

2021 ◽  
pp. 174702182110394
Author(s):  
Diana B. Galarraga ◽  
Jay Pratt ◽  
Brett A. Cochrane
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Snarc Effect ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
Temporal Order Judgement ◽  
The Right ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments

The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect reflects the phenomenon that low digits are responded to faster with the left hand and high digits with the right. Recently, a particular variant of the SNARC effect known as the attentional SNARC (which reflects that attention can be shifted in a similar manner) has had notable replicability issues. However, a potentially useful method for measuring it was revealed by Casarotti et al. (2007) using a temporal order judgement (TOJ) task. Accordingly, the present study evaluated whether Casarotti et al.’s results were reproducible by presenting a low (1) or high (9) digit prior to a TOJ task where participants had to indicate which of two peripherally presented targets appeared first (Experiment 1) or second (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, it was revealed that the findings of Casarotti et al.’s were indeed observable upon replication. In Experiment 2, when attention and response dimensions were put in opposition, the SNARC effect corresponded to the side of response rather than attention. Taken together, the present study confirms the robustness of the attentional SNARC in TOJ tasks, but that it is not likely due to shifts in attention.

Visuotactile temporal order judgments in ageing

2006 ◽  
Vol 396 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Poliakoff ◽  
D.I. Shore ◽  
C. Lowe ◽  
C. Spence
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Order ◽  
Temporal Order Judgments
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document