scholarly journals Erratum to: Feature frequency effects in recognition memory

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1324-1324
Author(s):  
K. J. Malmberg ◽  
M. Steyvers ◽  
J. D. Stephens ◽  
R. M. Shiffrin
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Frequency Effects ◽  
Feature Frequency

scholarly journals Feature frequency effects in recognition memory

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 607-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Malmberg ◽  
Mark Steyvers ◽  
Joseph D. Stephens ◽  
Richard M. Shiffrin
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Frequency Effects ◽  
Feature Frequency

Phrases Don't Behave Like Words: Phrase Frequency Effects in Recognition Memory

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra L. Jacobs ◽  
Gary S. Dell ◽  
Aaron S. Benjamin ◽  
Colin Bannard
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Frequency Effects

scholarly journals The effect of feature frequency on short-term recognition memory

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 285-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. E. Johns ◽  
D. J. K. Mewhort
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Feature Frequency

Deity Representation: A Prototype Approach

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 258-286
Author(s):  
Ross W. May ◽  
Frank D. Fincham
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Central Feature ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Prototype Structure ◽  
Choice Latency ◽  
Feature Centrality ◽  
Feature Frequency

This research systematically evaluates via prototype analysis how conceptualizations of Western adult's monotheistic God are structured. Over 4 studies, using U.S. student and community samples of predominantly Christians, features of God are identified, feature centrality is documented, and centrality influence on cognition is evaluated. Studies 1 and 2 produced considerable overlap in feature frequency and centrality ratings across the samples, with “God is love” being the most frequently listed central feature. In Studies 3 (choice latency) and 4 (recall and recognition memory), the centrality of features influenced cognitive processes: central features were more quickly identified as features of God than peripheral features; were correctly recognized more often; and central features were correctly recalled more often than peripheral features. Results indicated that participants meaningfully judged centrality and that centrality affected cognition. Thus, the two criteria necessary for demonstrating deity representations adhere to a prototype structure were met. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Word frequency effects in episodic memory: The roles of feature frequency and context frequency

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark. Steyvers ◽  
Ken Malmberg ◽  
Rich M. Shiffrin ◽  
Joseph Stephens
Keyword(s):  
Episodic Memory ◽  
Word Frequency ◽  
Frequency Effects ◽  
Feature Frequency

How do memory modules differentially contribute to familiarity and recollection?

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olya Hakobyan ◽  
Sen Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Subjective Experience ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Memory Modules ◽  
Familiarity And Recollection ◽  
Memory Contents

Abstract We fully support dissociating the subjective experience from the memory contents in recognition memory, as Bastin et al. posit in the target article. However, having two generic memory modules with qualitatively different functions is not mandatory and is in fact inconsistent with experimental evidence. We propose that quantitative differences in the properties of the memory modules can account for the apparent dissociation of recollection and familiarity along anatomical lines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document