scholarly journals KINETIC MODELING OF DISSOLUTION PROFILES OF NONIONIC SURFACTANT RIFAMPICIN NIOSOMES

2016 ◽  
Vol 03 (05) ◽  
pp. 150-155
Author(s):  
PARTHIBAN K
1990 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 1159-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Dagaut ◽  
M Cathonnet ◽  
B Aboussi ◽  
JC Boettner

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 254-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Yamazaki ◽  
Sho Sakaino ◽  
Toshiaki Tsuji

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda Slakman ◽  
Richard West

<div> <div> <div> <p>This article reviews prior work studying reaction kinetics in solution, with the goal of using this information to improve detailed kinetic modeling in the solvent phase. Both experimental and computational methods for calculating reaction rates in liquids are reviewed. Previous studies, which used such methods to determine solvent effects, are then analyzed based on reaction family. Many of these studies correlate kinetic solvent effect with one or more solvent parameters or properties of reacting species, but it is not always possible, and investigations are usually done on too few reactions and solvents to truly generalize. From these studies, we present suggestions on how best to use data to generalize solvent effects for many different reaction types in a high throughput manner. </p> </div> </div> </div>


2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-433
Author(s):  
Lusine Harutyunyan ◽  
Gohar Petrosyan ◽  
Romik Harutyunyan

1991 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1585-1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Vaňura

Extraction of rare earth metals from lithium trichloroacetate solutions ( 1.20-2.88 mol l-1) with solutions of the commercial nonionic surfactant Slovafol 909 (p-nonylphenylnonaethylene glycol) in chloroform and dichloromethane was investigated. The extraction constants as well as the Slovafol 909 distribution constants were determined in the water-dichloromethane and water-chloroform systems. The lanthanide distribution ratios decrease with their atomic numbers first rather rapidly (approximately to Sm): the separation factor αSmLa = 1.54 and 1.87 in dichloromethane and in chloroform, respectively; for lanthanides with higher atomic numbers the drop is less pronounced (αLuLa = 2.42 and 2.85 in the two solvents, respectively).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document