scholarly journals Adjuvant therapy for stages II and III colon cancer: risk stratification, treatment duration, and future directions

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Bender ◽  
Y.S. Rho ◽  
I. Barrera ◽  
S. Aghajanyan ◽  
J. Acoba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Duration Of Therapy ◽  
Colon Cancer Risk ◽  
Genomic Assays

Background To date, the role of adjuvant systemic therapy in stages ii and iii colon cancer remains a topic of interest and debate. The objective of the present review was to assess the most recent data, specifically addressing methods of risk stratification, duration of therapy, and future directions.Methods PubMed and medline were searched for literature pertinent to adjuvant chemotherapy in either stage ii or stage iii colorectal cancer.Summary Locoregional disease, histopathology, age, laterality, and a number of other biologic and molecular markers appear to have a role in disease risk stratification. The duration of adjuvant therapy for stage iii disease can vary based on risk factors, but use of adjuvant therapy and duration of therapy in stage ii disease remain controversial. Future directions should include genomic assays and improved study design to provide concrete evidence about the duration of adjuvant folfox or capox and about other types of chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Uptake of adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer in older and younger patients in the Irish population.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 478-478
Author(s):  
Seamus Coyle ◽  
Zia Rehman ◽  
Chalen Lee ◽  
Sandra Deady ◽  
Harry Comber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
The Impact

478 Background: Colon cancer is predominantly a disease of the elderly, with recent evidence supporting the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the older population. However, it remains unclear to what degree such patients are receiving adjuvant therapy in clinical practice. We examined uptake of adjuvantchemotherapy and it’s impact on survival in older patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer in a national cohort. Methods: Using the National cancer Registry of Ireland, we identified 3,486 patients with stage II and III colon cancer who were treated with curative resection from 2004-2009. Clinopathological features and chemotherapy use were compared between those ≥70 years and those < 70 years. Results: A total of 2,026 patients with stage II disease were identified, 56% male and 60% ≥ 70 years. T3 tumors accounted for 81%, T4 19% and 89% were grade 2/3. Adjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 10% and 40% of ≥ 70 and <70 years, respectively (p<0.0001). A benefit for chemotherapy over observation alone was seen in both the older [HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.36 – 0.68; p <0.0001] and younger patient groups [HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.2701 - 0.6881; p<0.0004]. Of 1,460 patients with stage III disease, 51% were ≥ 70 years, 54% male. 34% of older and 83% of younger patients received adjuvant therapy (p<0.0001). A similar magnitude of benefit from chemotherapy compared to observation was seen in patients ≥ 70 years [HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.29 - 0.45 ; p <0.0001] and <70 years [HR 0.22 95%CI 0.1 – 0.2; p<0.0001] with stage III disease. Conclusions: Adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be associated with significant survival benefit in older patients (age ≥ 70 years), however, is still underutilized in clinical practice. The impact of sociodemographic and clinicopathological features as potential drivers of treatment decisions in a cohort of this population will be reported.

scholarly journals Validation of the 12-Gene Colon Cancer Recurrence Score in NSABP C-07 As a Predictor of Recurrence in Patients With Stage II and III Colon Cancer Treated With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin (FU/LV) and FU/LV Plus Oxaliplatin

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (36) ◽  
pp. 4512-4519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Michael J. O'Connell ◽  
Mark Lee ◽  
Margarita Lopatin ◽  
Kim M. Clark-Langone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Recurrence Score ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Treatment Benefit ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

Purpose Accurate assessments of recurrence risk and absolute treatment benefit are needed to inform colon cancer adjuvant therapy. The 12-gene Recurrence Score assay has been validated in patients with stage II colon cancer from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9581 and Quick and Simple and Reliable (QUASAR) trials. We conducted an independent, prospectively designed clinical validation study of Recurrence Score, with prespecified end points and analysis plan, in archival specimens from patients with stage II and III colon cancer randomly assigned to fluorouracil (FU) or FU plus oxaliplatin in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-07. Methods Recurrence Score was assessed in 892 fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens (randomly selected 50% of patients with tissue). Data were analyzed by Cox regression adjusting for stage and treatment. Results Continuous Recurrence Score predicted recurrence (hazard ratio for a 25-unit increase in score, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.50 to 2.55; P < .001), as well as disease-free and overall survival (both P < .001). Recurrence Score predicted recurrence risk (P = .001) after adjustment for stage, mismatch repair, nodes examined, grade, and treatment. Recurrence Score did not have significant interaction with stage (P = .90) or age (P = .76). Relative benefit of oxaliplatin was similar across the range of Recurrence Score (interaction P = .48); accordingly, absolute benefit of oxaliplatin increased with higher scores, most notably in patients with stage II and IIIA/B disease. Conclusion The 12-gene Recurrence Score predicts recurrence risk in stage II and stage III colon cancer and provides additional information beyond conventional clinical and pathologic factors. Incorporating Recurrence Score into the clinical context may better inform adjuvant therapy decisions in stage III as well as stage II colon cancer.

scholarly journals Impact of Patient Factors on Recurrence Risk and Time Dependency of Oxaliplatin Benefit in Patients With Colon Cancer: Analysis From Modern-Era Adjuvant Studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points (ACCENT) Database

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 843-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Lindsay A. Renfro ◽  
Carmen J. Allegra ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
Aimery de Gramont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FU + LV) adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the risk of recurrence and death across all time points in a pooled analysis of 20,898 patients with colon cancer from 18 randomized studies. The impact of oxaliplatin added to FU + LV on the time course of recurrence and survival remains unknown. Patients and Methods A total of 12,233 patients enrolled to the randomized trials C-07, C-08, N0147, MOSAIC (Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer), and XELOXA (Adjuvant XELOX) were pooled to examine the impact of oxaliplatin and tumor-specific factors on the time course of recurrence and death. For each end point, continuous-time risk was modeled over 6 years post treatment in all oxaliplatin-treated patients and patients concurrently randomized to FU + LV with or without oxaliplatin; the latter analyses supported time-dependent treatment comparisons. Results Addition of oxaliplatin significantly reduced the risk of recurrence within the first 14 months post treatment for patients with stage II disease and within the first 4 years for patients with stage III disease. Oxaliplatin also significantly reduced risk of death from 2 to 6 years post treatment for patients with stage III disease, with no differences in timing of outcomes between treatment groups (ie, oxaliplatin did not simply postpone recurrence or death compared with FU + LV alone). Patients with stage II disease receiving oxaliplatin did not exhibit a significant reduction in risk of death in the first 6 years post treatment. Recurrence risk peaked near 14 months for both treatments, and risk of recurrence and death increased with increased tumor and nodal burden. Conclusions These analyses support the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with stage III disease and underscore the need for adequate surveillance of patients with colon cancer during the first 3 years after adjuvant therapy.

Intergroup study of fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant therapy for stage II/Dukes' B2 colon cancer.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2936-2943 ◽  
Author(s):  
C G Moertel ◽  
T R Fleming ◽  
J S Macdonald ◽  
D G Haller ◽  
J A Laurie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Salvage Surgery ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Cooperative Groups ◽  
Curative Intent

PURPOSE To determine the effectiveness of fluorouracil plus levamisole administered postoperatively to patients with resected stage II (Dukes' B2) colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS This randomized controlled clinical trial (INT-0035) was performed by National Cancer Institute-sponsored cancer clinical trials cooperative groups. Patients were assigned to observation only or to fluorouracil (450 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] daily for 5 days and, beginning at 28 days, weekly for 48 weeks) plus levamisole (50 mg orally three times daily for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 1 year). Cancer recurrence, survival, and treatment side effects were assessed. RESULTS Three hundred eighteen eligible patients were analyzed with a median follow-up time of 7 years. Fluorouracil plus levamisole reduced the recurrence rate by 31%, although this trend was not statistically significant (P = .10). A total of 87 patients died: 43 on observation and 44 on fluorouracil plus levamisole. Disparity between effects on recurrence rate and overall survival is partially explained by a higher rate of non-colon cancer-related deaths on fluorouracil plus levamisole (15 v seven) and by the effects of salvage surgery with curative intent. Of seven patients with recurrence who were rendered disease-free by salvage surgery, six were on the observation arm. As was observed in patients treated with fluorouracil plus levamisole for stage III disease, toxicity was acceptable and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSION Fluorouracil plus levamisole is tolerable and accepted as standard surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer, but the data from this study in stage II patients suggest a decreased relapse rate without a significant improvement in survival.

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes After Fluorouracil-Based Adjuvant Therapy for Stages II and III Colon Cancer Between 1978 to 1995 and 1996 to 2007: Evidence of Stage Migration From the ACCENT Database

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (29) ◽  
pp. 3656-3663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Shi ◽  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Stanley R. Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Migration ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Cancer Data ◽  
Over Time

Purpose With improved patient care, better diagnosis, and more treatment options after tumor recurrence, outcomes after fluorouracil (FU) -based treatment are expected to have improved over time in early-stage colon cancer. Data from 18,449 patients enrolled onto 21 phase III trials conducted from 1978 to 2002 were evaluated for potential differences in time to recurrence (TTR), time from recurrence to death (TRD), and overall survival (OS) with regard to FU-based adjuvant regimens. Methods Trials were predefined as old versus newer era using initial accrual before or after 1995. Outcomes were compared between patients enrolled onto old- or newer-era trials, stratified by stage. Results Within the first 3 years, recurrence rates were lower in newer- versus old-era trials for patients with stage II disease, with no differences among those with stage III disease. Both TRD and OS were significantly longer in newer-era trials overall and within each stage. The lymph node (LN) ratio (ie, number of positive nodes divided by total nodes harvested) in those with stage III disease declined over time. TTR improved slightly, with larger number of LNs examined in both stages. Conclusion Improved TRD in newer trials supports the premise that more aggressive intervention (oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy and/or surgery for recurrent disease) improves OS for patients previously treated in the adjuvant setting. Lower recurrence rates with identical treatments in those with stage II disease enrolled onto newer-era trials reflect stage migration over time, calling into question historical data related to the benefit of FU-based adjuvant therapy in such patients.

Pilot study of the combination of capecitabine + oxaliplatin as adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III and high risk stage II colon cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15093-15093
Author(s):  
C. Olier ◽  
C. Reyna ◽  
J. M. Aramendia ◽  
J. Rodriguez ◽  
A. Viudez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document