scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measurement compared with professional judgment of cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T.P.M. Brands-Appeldoorn ◽  
A.J.G. Maaskant-Braat ◽  
W.A.R Zwaans ◽  
J.P. Dieleman ◽  
K.E. Schenk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Breast Conserving Therapy ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Professional Judgment ◽  
Size And Shape ◽  
Patient Reported

Background In the present study, we set out to compare patient reported outcomes with professional judgment about cosmesis after breast-conserving therapy (bct) and to evaluate which items (position of the nipple, color, scar, size, shape, and firmness) correlate best with subjective outcome.Methods Dutch patients treated with bct between 2008 and 2009 were analyzed. Exclusion criteria were prior amputation or bct of the contralateral breast, metastatic disease, local recurrence, or any prior cosmetic breast surgery. Structured questionnaires and standardized six-view photographs were obtained with a minimum of 3 years’ follow-up. Cosmetic outcome was judged by the patients and, based on photographs, by 5 different medical professionals using 3 different scoring systems: the Harvard scale, the Sneeuw questionnaire, and a numeric rating scale. Agreement was scored using the intraclass correlation coefficient (icc). The association between items of the Sneeuw questionnaire and a fair–poor Harvard score was estimated using logistic regression analysis.Results The study included 108 female patients (age: 40–91 years). Based on the Harvard scale, agreement on cosmetic outcome between the professionals was good (icc: 0.78). In contrast, agreement between professionals as a group compared with the patients was found to be fair to moderate (icc range: 0.38–0.50). The items “size” and “shape” were identified as the strongest determinants of cosmetic outcome.Conclusions Cosmetic outcome was scored differently by patients and professionals. Agreement was greater between the professionals than between the patients and the professionals as a group. In general, size and shape were the most prominent items on which cosmetic outcome was judged by patients and professionals alike.

scholarly journals Trajectories of fatigue in actively treated patients with established rheumatoid arthritis starting biologic DMARD therapy

RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. e001372
Author(s):  
Sella Aarrestad Provan ◽  
Brigitte Michelsen ◽  
Joseph Sexton ◽  
Tillmann Uhlig ◽  
Hilde Berner Hammer
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Tender Joint ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Biologic Dmard ◽  
Clinically Significant

ObjectivesTo define fatigue trajectories in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who initiate biological DMARD (bDMARD) treatment, and explore baseline predictors for a trajectory of continued fatigue.MethodsOne-hundred and eighty-four patients with RA initiating bDMARDs were assessed at 0, 1, 2, 3, 6 and 12 months. Swollen and tender joint counts, patient reported outcomes (PROMs), blood samples and ultrasound examinations were collected at each time point. Fatigue was assessed by the fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (0–10) from the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) questionnaire. Clinically significant fatigue was predefined as fatigue ≥4. Three trajectories of interest were defined according to level of RAID fatigue: no fatigue (≤3 at 5/6 visits), improved fatigue (≥4 at start, but ≤3 at follow-up) and continued fatigue (≥4 at 5/6 visits). Baseline variables were compared between groups by bivariate analyses, and logistic regression models were used to explore baseline predictors of continued vs improved fatigue.ResultsThe majority of patients starting bDMARD therapy followed one of three fatigue trajectories, (no fatigue; n=61, improved; n=33 and continued fatigue; n=53). Patients with continued fatigue were more likely to be anti–citrullinated protein antibody and/or rheumatoid factor positive and had higher baseline PROMs compared to the other groups, while there were no differences between the groups for variables of inflammation including. Patient global, tender joint count and anxiety were predictors for the continued fatigue trajectory.DiscussionA trajectory of continued fatigue was determined by PROMs and not by inflammatory RA disease activity.

Factors related to patient-reported cosmetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. P. M. Brands-Appeldoorn ◽  
R. C. M. Thomma ◽  
L. Janssen ◽  
A. J. G. Maaskant-Braat ◽  
V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Breast Conserving Therapy ◽  
Cosmetic Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported

Differences in calculated percentage improvement versus patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scores: a review of spinal cord stimulation trials

2021 ◽  
pp. rapm-2020-102238
Author(s):  
Jonathan M Hagedorn ◽  
Timothy R Deer ◽  
Nicholas C Canzanello ◽  
Stephen M Covington ◽  
Darrell R Schroeder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Concordance Correlation ◽  
Percentage Improvement ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Numeric Rating

IntroductionSpinal cord stimulation is frequently used for the treatment of intractable chronic pain conditions. Trialing of the spinal cord stimulator device is recommended to assess the patient’s response to neurostimulation before permanent implantation. The trial response is often assessed by Numeric Rating Scale changes and patient-reported percentage pain improvement. Using number rating scale changes between prespinal and postspinal cord stimulation trial, a calculated percentage pain improvement can be obtained. The aim of this study was to assess the difference between calculated and patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scale during spinal cord stimulation trials.MethodsThis study was a retrospective single center review of all spinal cord stimulation trials from January 1 2017 to July 1 2019. A total of 174 patients were included. The paired t-test was used to compare numeric pain scores obtained prestimulation versus poststimulation. The mean difference between methods (patient-reported minus calculated) was compared with zero using the 1-sample t-test. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was computed with a 95% CI, calculated using Fisher z-transformation; and a bootstrapping approach was used to compare the concordance correlation coefficient between groups. In all cases, two-tailed tests were used with p<0.05 considered statistically significant.ResultsBased on prestimulation and poststimulation numeric rating scale scores, the mean±SD calculated percentage improvement in pain scale was 54±28. The mean±SD patient-reported percentage improvement in pain scale was 59±25. The overall 95% limits of agreement for the two methods are −30% to +41%. The overall concordance correlation coefficient was 0.76 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.81).ConclusionAlthough the two methods are highly correlated, there is substantial lack of agreement between patient-reported and calculated percentage improvement in pain scale, suggesting that these measures should not be used interchangeably for spinal cord stimulator trial outcome assessment. This emphasizes the need for improved metrics to better measure patient response to neuromodulation therapies. Additionally, patient-reported percentage improvement in pain was found to be higher than calculated percentage improvement in pain, potentially highlighting the multidimensional experience of pain and the unpredictability of solely using Numeric Rating Scale scores to assess patient outcomes.

Oral mucositis is associated with increased resource use among patients receiving treatment for cancers of the head and neck

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6070-6070
Author(s):  
D. M. Keefe ◽  
A. Garden ◽  
A. Barasch ◽  
R. Tischler ◽  
M. Brennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Oral Mucositis ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Mucosal Injury ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Oral Manifestation ◽  
Validated Questionnaire ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Multicenter Prospective Study

6070 Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is the oral manifestation of mucosal injury (MUI), and is a common, bothersome, and treatment-interrupting toxicity of chemoradiation therapy for squamous cell cancers (SCC) of the head and neck. Retrospective studies have reported that OM increases healthcare resource use. We present interim results of an international, multicenter, prospective study undertaken to characterize the clinical and economic burden of OM in patients with cancers of the oral cavity (OC), oropharynx (OP), larynx (L) and hypopharynx (HP). Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically proven SCC of the designated anatomical sites, whose planned treatment included full-cycle conventional or intensity modulated (IM) radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy, were enrolled at least one week prior to the start of treatment. Pts completed the Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ), a validated questionnaire developed to document patient-reported symptoms of OM and MUI including mouth and throat soreness (MTS), at baseline and daily throughout RT. MTS was assessed using a 5-point numeric rating scale, ranging from 0 (“no soreness”) to 4 (“extreme soreness”). Results: Of the first 61 pts to complete RT, 72% had cancers of the OC or OP, 49% received IMRT with concomitant chemotherapy, and 68% were male. 95% of pts reported OM symptoms (MTS>0); 80% had one or more scores =2. Pts with OC or OP cancers reported more symptoms than those with L or HP tumors (mean maximum score: 3.3 vs 2.8; p= 0.12). MTS scores were positively related to levels of resource use. Conclusions: Symptoms of radiation-induced OM are positively correlated with levels of resource utilization in patients with head and neck cancers. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals SF-12 or SF-36 in pituitary disease? Toward concise and comprehensive patient-reported outcomes measurements

Endocrine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merel van der Meulen ◽  
Amir H. Zamanipoor Najafabadi ◽  
Daniel J. Lobatto ◽  
Cornelie D. Andela ◽  
Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Fair Agreement ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Pituitary Diseases ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Differences

Abstract Purpose Pituitary diseases severely affect patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The most frequently used generic HRQoL questionnaire is the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The shorter 12-item version (SF-12) can improve efficiency of patient monitoring. This study aimed to determine whether SF-12 can replace SF-36 in pituitary care. Methods In a longitudinal cohort study (August 2016 to December 2018) among 103 endoscopically operated adult pituitary tumor patients, physical and mental component scores (PCS and MCS) of SF-36 and SF-12 were measured preoperatively, and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Chronic care was assessed with a cross-sectional study (N = 431). Mean differences and agreement between SF-36 and SF-12 change in scores (preoperative vs. 6 months) were assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement, depicting 95% of individual patients. Results In the longitudinal study, mean differences between change in SF-36 and SF-12 scores were 1.4 (PCS) and 0.4 (MCS) with fair agreement for PCS (ICC = 0.546) and substantial agreement for MCS (ICC = 0.931). For 95% of individual patients, the difference between change in SF-36 and SF-12 scores varied between −14.0 and 16.9 for PCS and between −7.8 and 8.7 for MCS. Cross-sectional results showed fair agreement for PCS (ICC = 0.597) and substantial agreement for MCS (ICC = 0.943). Conclusions On a group level, SF-12 can reliably reproduce MCS in pituitary patients, although PCS is less well correlated. However, individual differences between SF-36 and SF-12 can be large. For pituitary diseases, alternative strategies are needed for concise, but comprehensive patient-reported outcome measurement.

Predictors of the Best Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade 1 Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K Chan ◽  
Erica F Bisson ◽  
Mohamad Bydon ◽  
Steven D Glassman ◽  
Kevin T Foley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive Surgery ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Surgery ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Abstract BACKGROUND The factors driving the best outcomes following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis are not clearly elucidated. OBJECTIVE To investigate the factors that drive the best 24-mo patient-reported outcomes (PRO) following MIS surgery for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS A total of 259 patients from the Quality Outcomes Database lumbar spondylolisthesis module underwent single-level surgery for degenerative grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis with MIS techniques (188 fusions, 72.6%). Twenty-four-month follow-up PROs were collected and included the Oswestry disability index (ODI) change (ie, 24-mo minus baseline value), numeric rating scale (NRS) back pain change, NRS leg pain change, EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire change, and North American Spine Society (NASS) satisfaction questionnaire. Multivariable models were constructed to identify predictors of PRO change. RESULTS The mean age was 64.2 ± 11.5 yr and consisted of 148 (57.1%) women and 111 (42.9%) men. In multivariable analyses, employment was associated with superior postoperative ODI change (β-7.8; 95% CI [−12.9 to −2.6]; P = .003), NRS back pain change (β −1.2; 95% CI [−2.1 to −0.4]; P = .004), EQ-5D change (β 0.1; 95% CI [0.01-0.1]; P = .03), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 3.7; 95% CI [1.7-8.3]; P &lt; .001). Increasing age was associated with superior NRS leg pain change (β −0.1; 95% CI [−0.1 to −0.01]; P = .03) and NASS satisfaction (OR = 1.05; 95% CI [1.01-1.09]; P = .02). Fusion surgeries were associated with superior ODI change (β −6.7; 95% CI [−12.7 to −0.7]; P = .03), NRS back pain change (β −1.1; 95% CI [−2.1 to −0.2]; P = .02), and NASS satisfaction (OR = 3.6; 95% CI [1.6-8.3]; P = .002). CONCLUSION Preoperative employment and surgeries, including a fusion, were predictors of superior outcomes across the domains of disease-specific disability, back pain, leg pain, quality of life, and patient satisfaction. Increasing age was predictive of superior outcomes for leg pain improvement and satisfaction.

scholarly journals Fatigue numeric rating scale validity, discrimination and responder definition in patients with psoriatic arthritis

RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafna Gladman ◽  
Peter Nash ◽  
Hitoshi Goto ◽  
Julie A Birt ◽  
Chen-Yen Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Numeric Rating

ObjectivesThis study assessed the psychometric properties of the fatigue numeric rating scale (NRS) and sought to establish values for clinically meaningful change (responder definition).MethodsUsing disease-specific clinician-reported and patient-reported data from two randomised clinical trials of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), the fatigue NRS was evaluated for test–retest reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. A responder definition was also explored using anchor-based and distribution-based methods.ResultsTest–retest reliability analyses supported the reproducibility of the fatigue NRS in patients with PsA (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.829). Mean (SD) values at baseline and week 2 were 5.7 (2.2) and 5.7 (2.4), respectively. Supporting construct validity of the fatigue NRS, moderate-to-large correlations with other assessments measuring similar concepts as measured by Sackett’s conventions were demonstrated. Fatigue severity was reduced when the underlying disease activity was improved and reductions remained consistent at week 12 and 24. A 3-point improvement was identified as being optimal for demonstrating a level of clinically meaningful improvement in fatigue NRS after 12–24 weeks of treatment.ConclusionsFatigue NRS is a valid and responsive patient-reported outcome instrument for use in patients with PsA. The established psychometric properties from this study support the use of fatigue NRS in clinical trials and in routine clinical practice. Robust validation of reliability for use in routine clinical practice in treating patients with active PsA in less active disease states and other more diverse ethnic groups is needed.

Comprehensive Assessment of 1-Year Outcomes and Determination of Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life After Suboccipital Decompression for Chiari Malformation I in Adults

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott L. Parker ◽  
Saniya S. Godil ◽  
Scott L. Zuckerman ◽  
Stephen K. Mendenhall ◽  
John A. Wells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Difference Thresholds

Abstract BACKGROUND: To date, there has been no study to comprehensively assess the effectiveness of suboccipital craniectomy (SOC) for Chiari malformation I (CMI) using validated patient-reported outcome measures. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and minimum clinically important difference thresholds of SOC for the treatment of adult patients with CMI using patient-reported outcome metrics. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing first-time SOC and C1 laminectomy for CMI at a single institution were followed up for 1 year. Baseline and 1-year postoperative pain, disability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, and return to work were assessed. Minimum clinically important difference thresholds were calculated with 2 anchors: the Health Transition Index and North American Spine Society satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: The severity of headaches improved in 37 patients (74%). Improvement in syrinx size was seen in 12 patients (63%) and myelopathy in 12 patients (60%). All patient-reported outcomes showed significant improvement 1 year postoperatively (P &lt; .05). Of the 38 patients (76%) employed preoperatively, 29 (76%) returned to work postoperatively at a median time of 6 weeks (interquartile range, 4-12 weeks). Minimum clinically important difference thresholds after SOC for CMI were 4.4 points for numeric rating scale for headache, 0.7 points for numeric rating scale for neck pain, 13.8 percentage points for Headache Disability Index, 14.2 percentage points for Neck Disability Index, 7.0 points for Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, 6.1 points for Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary, 4.5 points for Zung depression, 1.7 points for modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association, and 0.34 quality-adjusted life-years for Euro-Qol-5D. CONCLUSION: Surgical management of CMI in adults via SOC provides significant and sustained improvement in pain, disability, general health, and quality of life as assessed by patient-reported outcomes. This patient-centered assessment suggests that suboccipital decompression for CMI in adults is an effective treatment strategy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document