Corrigendum: Survival and treatment patterns in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in Manitoba

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Current Oncology
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18110-18110
Author(s):  
G. R. Oxnard ◽  
P. Fidias ◽  
L. V. Sequist

18110 Background: Among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients aged 80 or older, termed the ‘very elderly‘, have inferior survival. Treatment patterns within this patient population are poorly described. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed of 111 outpatients with NSCLC presenting at age 80 or older to an academic referral center over 5.3 years. Based upon available literature regarding elderly patients with NSCLC, a guideline recommended therapy (GRT) was determined for each tumor stage. Each patient’s treatment regimen was evaluated for consistency with the GRT. Particular attention was paid to how patient characteristics and attitudes influenced therapy decisions. Results: Patients characteristics included: median age 82.6 (range 80–92); 50% male; 55% adenocarcinoma, 19% squamous cell; 30% stage I-II, 28% stage III, 39% stage IV; and 59% performance status (PS) 0–1, 25% PS = 2 (PS not available for 15%). 89% of patients received some form of anti-neoplastic therapy and 11% were treated with best supportive care alone. Of 34 patients with localized disease, 53% underwent tumor resection and 38% received definitive radiation. Of 74 patients with stage III or IV disease, 34% received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Radiotherapy (47%) and oral targeted therapy (35%) were the most common treatment modalities overall. 32% of patients received the stage-specific GRT. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that independent predictors for failing to receive GRT included PS = 2 (odds ratio [OR] 17.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2–135) and age =85 (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.0–23.4) Of the patients who failed to receive GRT, 19% electively refused GRT that was offered (13% specifically refused chemotherapy), and 76% were not offered GRT (44% due to PS or comorbidities, 32% due to age or unstated reasons). Conclusions: The vast majority of NSCLC patients age 80 or above receive some form of anti-neoplastic therapy, but only one-third of this population receives the stage-specific GRT. The strongest predictor of treatment with GRT is PS 0–1; those with poor PS are 17-fold less likely to receive GRT. A small but clinically significant portion of patients elect against the offered GRT; more data is needed about the attitudes of these patients toward therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7101-7101
Author(s):  
Sudeep Karve ◽  
Gregory Price ◽  
Keith L. Davis ◽  
Gerhardt Pohl ◽  
Emily Nash Smyth

7101 Background: Limited data exist on real-world treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and associated costs of advanced SCLC among elderly patients in the US, and there are no recent comparisons between patients with advanced SCLC and advanced NSCLC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed administrative claims data for elderly patients (≥65 years) from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database for 2000-2008. Patients with a new diagnosis of distant stage lung cancer receiving cancer-directed therapy (ie, surgery, radiation, biologics, and/or chemotherapy) were grouped by tumor type (SCLC [n=5,855] vs NSCLC [n=24,090]). Survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier Log-rank; categorical measures with Chi-square statistics; and continuous measures with t-tests. Results: Compared to SCLC patients, a significantly greater proportion of patients with NSCLC received radiation therapy (75.6% vs 65.4%; p<0.001) and surgery (13.6% vs 7.8%; p<0.001). Chemotherapy was received by 85.5% of SCLC patients and 60.3% of NSCLC patients (p<0.001). Significantly higher proportions of SCLC patients also received red blood cell (20.7% vs 10.9; p<0.001) and platelet transfusions (5.6% vs 1.8%; p<0.001) as well as growth factor support (58.9% vs 39.5%; p<0.001). Survival did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.424), with the mean (10.4 months vs 11.1 months) and median (7.4 months vs 5.9 months) survival for SCLC and NSCLC noted accordingly. Total lifetime lung cancer-related costs ($44,167 vs $37,932; p<0.001) and all-cause costs ($70,548 vs $67,175; p<0.001) per patient for SCLC exceeded those for NSCLC. The primary drivers of cost included resource utilization across 3 care settings: hospitalizations, office visits, and hospital outpatient visits. Conclusions: Overall total lifetime and disease-related costs per advanced SCLC and NSCLC patient were high, and costs for SCLC exceeded those for NSCLC. Survival estimates coupled with per patient costs for both cancers underscores the unmet medical need for patients with distant stage SCLC and NSCLC.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
C. L. Baunemann Ott ◽  
N. Ratna ◽  
R. Prayag ◽  
Z. Nugent ◽  
K. Badiani ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document