scholarly journals So You Want to Start a Peer Online Writing Center?

2013 ◽  
pp. 17-42
Author(s):  
Christine Rosalia
Keyword(s):  
Head Start ◽  
Writing Center ◽  
Writing Centers ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Language Learner ◽  
Generation 1.5 ◽  
Learning Center ◽  
Online Writing ◽  
Local Contexts ◽  
Technology Affordances

The purpose of this article is to share lessons learned in setting up three different peer online writing centers in three different contexts (EFL, Generation 1.5, and ESL). In each center the focus was on the language learner as a peer online writing advisor and their needs in maintaining centers “for and by” learners. Technology affordances and constraints for local contexts, which promote learner autonomy, are analyzed. The open-source platforms (Moodle, Drupal, and Google Apps) are compared in terms of usability for peer writing center work, particularly centers where groups co-construct feedback for writers, asynchronously. This paper is useful for readers who would like a head start or deeper understanding of potential logistics and decision-making involved in establishing a peer online writing center within coursework and/or a self-access learning center.

A Multilanguage Online Writing Center for Professional Communication: Development and Testing

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Jacobs ◽  
Liesbeth Opdenacker ◽  
Luuk Van Waes
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Writing Center ◽  
Writing Centers ◽  
Professional Communication ◽  
Professional Writing ◽  
Press Releases ◽  
Online Writing ◽  
Modular Platform ◽  
Context Specific ◽  
The University

An online writing center developed at the University of Antwerp, Belgium, called Calliope, provides a modular platform aimed at enhancing learners’ professional writing skills in five different languages: Dutch, English, French, German, and Spanish. It supports courses in business and technical communication. The current version includes modules on press releases in English, business letters in French, and minute taking in Dutch. Unlike many online writing centers, it is genre-specific and context-specific, it is highly interactive rather than linear, it uses a process approach to cater to different learning styles, it accommodates different writer profiles, and it is an instructional tool not connected to a physical writing center.

scholarly journals Discovering Methods of Bettering our Writing Center: A Report on Visits to US University Writing Centers

2016 ◽  
pp. 355-364
Author(s):  
Shawn Andersson ◽  
Maho Nakahashi
Keyword(s):  
Academic Success ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Writing Center ◽  
Writing Centers ◽  
University Of California ◽  
Learning Center ◽  
English Writing ◽  
Day To Day Operations ◽  
The University ◽  
Us University

English writing centers in Japan are a somewhat new phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to gain a perspective of actual operations of writing centers abroad. We visited the English writing centers of three universities in California with well-established, large centers to get a perspective of the day-to-day operations and best practices on how to run a writing center. The universities that we visited include the Hume Center for Writing and Speaking at Stanford University; the University of California, Berkeley Student Learning Center; and the University of California, Davis Student Academic Success Center.

scholarly journals Impacts on Head Start Dual Language Learning Children’s Early Science Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Brooke Rumper ◽  
Elizabeth Frechette ◽  
Daryl B. Greenfield ◽  
Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Keyword(s):  
Head Start ◽  
Dual Language ◽  
Language Use ◽  
Language Learner ◽  
Academic Science ◽  
Teacher Language ◽  
Language Dominance ◽  
Spanish Science ◽  
Science Scores ◽  
Science Assessments

The present study examined the roles that language of assessment, language dominance, and teacher language use during instruction play in Dual Language Learner (DLL) science scores. A total of 255 Head Start DLL children were assessed on equated science assessments in English and Spanish. First overall differences between the two languages were examined, then associations between performance on science assessments were compared and related to children’s language dominance, teacher quantity of English and Spanish, and teachers’ academic science language. When examined as a homogeneous group, DLLs did not perform differently on English or Spanish science assessments. However, when examined heterogeneously, Spanish-dominant DLLs performed better on Spanish science assessments. The percentage of English and Spanish used by teachers did not affect children’s science scores. Teachers’ use of Spanish academic science language impacted children’s performance on science assessments, but English did not. The results have implications for the assessment of DLLs and teacher language use during instruction.

Is This a Real Person? A Tutor's Response to Navigating Identity in the Spaces of a Synchronous Electronic Writing Center

2011 ◽  
pp. 231-260
Author(s):  
Amy Lee Locklear
Keyword(s):  
Writing Center ◽  
Pedagogical Issues ◽  
Tutor Training ◽  
Online Identity ◽  
Online Writing ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Electronic Writing ◽  
Real Person ◽  
Identity Perception ◽  
Synchronous Online

This chapter explores some of the theoretical and pedagogical issues that emerged from a study of identity, collaboration, and discourse methods in synchronous online writing center tutoring. Based on a newly introduced online component of an established university writing center, the premise of this study was to advance tutor training in the context of transferring traditional face-to-face (F2F) methodology to a synchronous terminal-to-terminal environment in a way that effectively preserved the integrity of dialogic collaboration. What emerged became a study of the rhetoric of face and space, in which an understanding of the complexities of online identity perception and projection becomes key to adapting existing F2F tutoring methods to online space in a way that promotes pedagogically sound discourse and learning.

Creating a Support Structure for Academic Writing and Publication Support

2015 ◽  
pp. 21-37
Author(s):  
Tonette S. Rocco ◽  
Lori Ann Gionti ◽  
Cynthia M. Januszka ◽  
Sunny L. Munn ◽  
Joshua C. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Graduate Students ◽  
Undergraduate Students ◽  
Academic Writing ◽  
Writing Center ◽  
Writing Centers ◽  
Scholarly Writing ◽  
Support Structure ◽  
Writing For Publication ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
The Way

Although research and writing for publication are seen as important responsibilities for most graduate students and faculty, many struggle to understand the process and how to succeed. Unfortunately, writing centers at most universities do not cater to these kinds of needs but rather to course-specific needs of undergraduate students. This chapter presents and explains the principles underlying Florida International University's establishment of The Office of Academic Writing and Publication Support, an office specifically designed to aid the scholarly writing efforts of graduate students and faculty. In doing so, this chapter aims to describe strategies and programs for the improvement of scholarly writing, provide insight into the kind of learning that can take place in a university writing center, and reflect on successes and missteps along the way. This chapter may be especially helpful to educators who seek to create similar offices or services at their own institutions.

scholarly journals Mining writing center data for information literacy practices

2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie J. Graves ◽  
Kathy Christie Anders ◽  
Valerie M. Balester
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Information Literacy ◽  
Writing Center ◽  
Literacy Practices ◽  
Writing Centers ◽  
Literacy Intervention ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Research Libraries ◽  
Institutional Boundaries

Purpose The study aims to explore collaborations between writing centers and libraries which create opportunities for providing information literacy intervention for students doing researched writing. This case study gathered data from writing center logs to uncover if and how information literacy activity was occurring during consultations. Design/methodology/approach A representative sample of writing center logs recorded between September of 2013 and May 2014 was mined for frequencies of library and information literacy terms. Transaction logs were coded and analyzed according to the frames in the Association of College and Research Libraries Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Findings Information literacy is discussed in only 13 per cent of consultations. Referrals to librarians accounted for less than 1 per cent of all transactions. Students most commonly asked for assistance in formatting citations, but deeper information literacy conversations did occur that provide opportunities for engagement with the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Research limitations/implications Transactions were examined from one university. Although findings cannot be generalized, the results were applicable to local services, and this study provides a model useful for libraries and writing centers. Practical implications This study provides ample direction for future collaborations that will take advantage of the intersections of information literacy and writing instruction to improve student research skills. Originality/value Although much has been written about partnerships between libraries and writing centers, this study uniquely demonstrates a model for data sharing across institutional boundaries and how one library mined existing data from a writing center.

scholarly journals There and Back Again (Almost)

2021 ◽  
pp. 286-289
Author(s):  
Timothy Lincoln ◽  
Mandy Deen ◽  
David Schmersal ◽  
Kristy Sorensen ◽  
John Vinke
Keyword(s):  
Construction Project ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Library Services ◽  
Learning Center ◽  
Digital Learning ◽  
Theological Seminary ◽  
Construction Process ◽  
Staff Members ◽  
Information Center ◽  
Collaborative Space

Library renovation caused the staff of Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary to plan a move of library services to a temporary location. The staff selected a subset of books to remain available to users; 90,000 volumes were placed in storage. Records for unavailable volumes were suppressed so that users would only see information about books available to them. The staff chose 6,000 books for a temporary library, based on faculty needs and past usage. Books were moved in January 2020. Staff were continuously involved in refining design and furniture decisions during the construction process, scheduled for completion in September 2021. The new Wright Learning and Information Center will feature a large collaborative space and a digital learning center. Lessons learned include the necessity for constant communication among staff members and keeping in mind that users want normal library services, despite the disruptions of a construction project.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document