scholarly journals New Approach to the $k$-Independence Number of a Graph

10.37236/2646 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yair Caro ◽  
Adriana Hansberg
Keyword(s):  
Graph Theory ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Average Degree ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
New Approach

Let $G = (V,E)$ be a graph and $k \ge 0$ an integer. A $k$-independent set $S \subseteq V$ is a set of vertices such that the maximum degree in the graph induced by $S$ is at most $k$. With $\alpha_k(G)$ we denote the maximum cardinality of a $k$-independent set of $G$. We prove that, for a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and average degree $d$, $\alpha_k(G) \ge \frac{k+1}{\lceil d \rceil + k + 1} n$, improving the hitherto best general lower bound due to Caro and Tuza [Improved lower bounds on $k$-independence, J. Graph Theory 15 (1991), 99-107].

New bounds on the independence number of connected graphs

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (05) ◽  
pp. 1850069
Author(s):  
Nader Jafari Rad ◽  
Elahe Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Connected Graph ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Applied Mathematics ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Connected Graphs ◽  
Cut Vertex

The independence number of a graph [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the maximum cardinality of an independent set of vertices in [Formula: see text]. [Henning and Löwenstein An improved lower bound on the independence number of a graph, Discrete Applied Mathematics  179 (2014) 120–128.] proved that if a connected graph [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text] and size [Formula: see text] does not belong to a specific family of graphs, then [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we strengthen the above bound for connected graphs with maximum degree at least three that have a non-cut-vertex of maximum degree. We show that if a connected graph [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text] and size [Formula: see text] has a non-cut-vertex of maximum degree then [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum degree of the vertices of [Formula: see text]. We also characterize all connected graphs [Formula: see text] of order [Formula: see text] and size [Formula: see text] that have a non-cut-vertex of maximum degree and [Formula: see text].

scholarly journals A New Lower Bound on the Independence Number of a Graph and Applications

10.37236/3601 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Christian Löwenstein ◽  
Justin Southey ◽  
Anders Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Maximum Clique ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Uniform Hypergraph ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Uniform Hypergraphs ◽  
Transversal Number ◽  
Graph Parameters

The independence number of a graph $G$, denoted $\alpha(G)$, is the maximum cardinality of an independent set of vertices in $G$. The independence number is one of the most fundamental and well-studied graph parameters. In this paper, we strengthen a result of Fajtlowicz [Combinatorica 4 (1984), 35-38] on the independence of a graph given its maximum degree and maximum clique size. As a consequence of our result we give bounds on the independence number and transversal number of $6$-uniform hypergraphs with maximum degree three. This gives support for a conjecture due to Tuza and Vestergaard [Discussiones Math. Graph Theory 22 (2002), 199-210] that if $H$ is a $3$-regular $6$-uniform hypergraph of order $n$, then $\tau(H) \le n/4$.

scholarly journals Transversals and Independence in Linear Hypergraphs with Maximum Degree Two

10.37236/6160 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Henning ◽  
Anders Yeo
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Upper Bounds ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Common Edge ◽  
Minimum Cardinality ◽  
Uniform Hypergraphs ◽  
Transversal Number ◽  
Linear Hypergraphs

For $k \ge 2$, let $H$ be a $k$-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices and $m$ edges. Let $S$ be a set of vertices in a hypergraph $H$. The set $S$ is a transversal if $S$ intersects every edge of $H$, while the set $S$ is strongly independent if no two vertices in $S$ belong to a common edge. The transversal number, $\tau(H)$, of $H$ is the minimum cardinality of a transversal in $H$, and the strong independence number of $H$, $\alpha(H)$, is the maximum cardinality of a strongly independent set in $H$. The hypergraph $H$ is linear if every two distinct edges of $H$ intersect in at most one vertex. Let $\mathcal{H}_k$ be the class of all connected, linear, $k$-uniform hypergraphs with maximum degree $2$. It is known [European J. Combin. 36 (2014), 231–236] that if $H \in \mathcal{H}_k$, then $(k+1)\tau(H) \le n+m$, and there are only two hypergraphs that achieve equality in the bound. In this paper, we prove a much more powerful result, and establish tight upper bounds on $\tau(H)$ and tight lower bounds on $\alpha(H)$ that are achieved for  infinite families of hypergraphs. More precisely, if $k \ge 3$ is odd and $H \in \mathcal{H}_k$ has $n$ vertices and $m$ edges, then we prove that $k(k^2 - 3)\tau(H) \le (k-2)(k+1)n + (k - 1)^2m + k-1$ and $k(k^2 - 3)\alpha(H) \ge  (k^2 + k - 4)n  - (k-1)^2 m - (k-1)$. Similar bounds are proven in the case when $k \ge 2$ is even.

scholarly journals New Results on $k$-Independence of Graphs

10.37236/5730 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimon Kogan
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Average Degree ◽  
Equal Size ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Turan's Theorem ◽  
Turán’S Theorem

Let $G = (V, E)$ be a graph and $k \geq 0$ an integer. A $k$-independent set $S \subseteq G$ is a set of vertices such that the maximum degree in the graph induced by $S$ is at most $k$. Denote by $\alpha_{k}(G)$ the maximum cardinality of a $k$-independent set of $G$. For a graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and average degree $d$, Turán's theorem asserts that $\alpha_{0}(G) \geq \frac{n}{d+1}$, where the equality holds if and only if $G$ is a union of cliques of equal size. For general $k$ we prove that $\alpha_{k}(G) \geq \dfrac{(k+1)n}{d+k+1}$, improving on the previous best bound $\alpha_{k}(G) \geq \dfrac{(k+1)n}{ \lceil d \rceil+k+1}$ of Caro and Hansberg [E-JC, 2013]. For $1$-independence we prove that equality holds if and only if $G$ is either an independent set or a union of almost-cliques of equal size (an almost-clique is a clique on an even number of vertices minus a $1$-factor). For $2$-independence, we prove that equality holds if and only if $G$ is an independent set. Furthermore when $d>0$ is an integer divisible by 3 we prove that $\alpha_2(G) \geq \dfrac{3n}{d+3} \left( 1 + \dfrac{12}{5d^2 + 25d + 18} \right)$.

Roman domination and 2-independence in trees

2017 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 1750023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nacéra Meddah ◽  
Mustapha Chellali
Keyword(s):  
Independence Number ◽  
Minimum Weight ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Maximum Cardinality ◽  
Roman Domination ◽  
Roman Domination Number ◽  
Number Formula ◽  
Sum Formula ◽  
Roman Dominating Function

A Roman dominating function (RDF) on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] satisfying the condition that every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. The weight of a RDF is the sum [Formula: see text], and the minimum weight of a RDF [Formula: see text] is the Roman domination number [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a [Formula: see text]-independent set of [Formula: see text] if every vertex of [Formula: see text] has at most one neighbor in [Formula: see text] The maximum cardinality of a [Formula: see text]-independent set of [Formula: see text] is the [Formula: see text]-independence number [Formula: see text] Both parameters are incomparable in general, however, we show that if [Formula: see text] is a tree, then [Formula: see text]. Moreover, all extremal trees attaining equality are characterized.

Outer-connected independence in graphs

2015 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 1550039
Author(s):  
I. Sahul Hamid ◽  
R. Gnanaprakasam ◽  
M. Fatima Mary
Keyword(s):  
Independence Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Proper Subset ◽  
Maximum Cardinality

A set S ⊆ V(G) is an independent set if no two vertices of S are adjacent. An independent set S such that 〈V - S〉 is connected is called an outer-connected independent set(oci-set). An oci-set is maximal if it is not a proper subset of any oci-set. The minimum and maximum cardinality of a maximal oci-set are called respectively the outer-connected independence number and the upper outer-connected independence number. This paper initiates a study of these parameters.

Strong vb-dominating and vb-independent sets of a graph

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (01) ◽  
pp. 2050002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sayinath Udupa ◽  
R. S. Bhat
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Dominating Set ◽  
Independence Number ◽  
Domination Number ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Independent Sets ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Number Formula

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph. A vertex [Formula: see text] strongly (weakly) b-dominates block [Formula: see text] if [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) for every vertex [Formula: see text] in the block [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is said to be strong (weak) vb-dominating set (SVBD-set) (WVBD-set) if every block in [Formula: see text] is strongly (weakly) b-dominated by some vertex in [Formula: see text]. The strong (weak) vb-domination number [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) is the order of a minimum SVBD (WVBD) set of [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] is said to be strong (weak) vertex block independent set (SVBI-set (WVBI-set)) if [Formula: see text] is a vertex block independent set and for every vertex [Formula: see text] and every block [Formula: see text] incident on [Formula: see text], there exists a vertex [Formula: see text] in the block [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). The strong (weak) vb-independence number [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) is the cardinality of a maximum strong (weak) vertex block independent set (SVBI-set) (WVBI-set) of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we investigate some relationships between these four parameters. Several upper and lower bounds are established. In addition, we characterize the graphs attaining some of the bounds.

scholarly journals Remarks on upper and lower bounds formatching sequencibility of graphs

Filomat ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 2091-2099
Author(s):  
Shuya Chiba ◽  
Yuji Nakano
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Edge Coloring ◽  
Hamilton Cycle ◽  
Upper And Lower Bounds ◽  
Linear Ordering ◽  
The Relationship

In 2008, Alspach [The Wonderful Walecki Construction, Bull. Inst. Combin. Appl. 52 (2008) 7-20] defined the matching sequencibility of a graph G to be the largest integer k such that there exists a linear ordering of its edges so that every k consecutive edges in the linear ordering form a matching of G, which is denoted by ms(G). In this paper, we show that every graph G of size q and maximum degree ? satisfies 1/2?q/?+1? ? ms(G) ? ?q?1/??1? by using the edge-coloring of G, and we also improve this lower bound for some particular graphs. We further discuss the relationship between the matching sequencibility and a conjecture of Seymour about the existence of the kth power of a Hamilton cycle.

scholarly journals Partitioning Sparse Graphs into an Independent Set and a Forest of Bounded Degree

10.37236/6815 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
François Dross ◽  
Mickael Montassier ◽  
Alexandre Pinlou
Keyword(s):  
Planar Graphs ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Independent Set ◽  
Average Degree ◽  
Bounded Degree ◽  
Sparse Graphs ◽  
Maximum Average Degree

An $({\cal I},{\cal F}_d)$-partition of a graph is a partition of the vertices of the graph into two sets $I$ and $F$, such that $I$ is an independent set and $F$ induces a forest of maximum degree at most $d$. We show that for all $M<3$ and $d \ge \frac{2}{3-M} - 2$, if a graph has maximum average degree less than $M$, then it has an $({\cal I},{\cal F}_d)$-partition. Additionally, we prove that for all $\frac{8}{3} \le M < 3$ and $d \ge \frac{1}{3-M}$, if a graph has maximum average degree less than $M$ then it has an $({\cal I},{\cal F}_d)$-partition. It follows that planar graphs with girth at least $7$ (resp. $8$, $10$) admit an $({\cal I},{\cal F}_5)$-partition (resp. $({\cal I},{\cal F}_3)$-partition, $({\cal I},{\cal F}_2)$-partition).

scholarly journals Difference betwwen the maximum degree and the index of a graph

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 434-440
Author(s):  
V. I. Benediktovich
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Spectral Radius ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Maximum Degree ◽  
Lower Boundary ◽  
Arbitrary Graph ◽  
Analogous Statement ◽  
Graph Classes ◽  
The Difference ◽  
A Chain

An algebraic parameter of a graph – a difference between its maximum degree and its spectral radius is considered in this paper. It is well known that this graph parameter is always nonnegative and represents some measure of deviation of a graph from its regularity. In the last two decades, many papers have been devoted to the study of this parameter. In particular, its lower bound depending on the graph order and diameter was obtained in 2007 by mathematician S. M. Cioabă. In 2017 when studying the upper and the lower bounds of this parameter, M. R. Oboudi made a conjecture that the lower bound of a given parameter for an arbitrary graph is the difference between a maximum degree and a spectral radius of a chain. This is very similar to the analogous statement for the spectral radius of an arbitrary graph whose lower boundary is also the spectral radius of a chain. In this paper, the above conjecture is confirmed for some graph classes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document