scholarly journals Dumont's Statistic on Words

10.37236/1555 ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Skandera

We define Dumont's statistic on the symmetric group $S_n$ to be the function dmc: $S_n \rightarrow {\bf N}$ which maps a permutation $\sigma$ to the number of distinct nonzero letters in code$( \sigma )$. Dumont showed that this statistic is Eulerian. Naturally extending Dumont's statistic to the rearrangement classes of arbitrary words, we create a generalized statistic which is again Eulerian. As a consequence, we show that for each distributive lattice $J(P)$ which is a product of chains, there is a poset $Q$ such that the $f$-vector of $Q$ is the $h$-vector of $J(P)$. This strengthens for products of chains a result of Stanley concerning the flag $h$-vectors of Cohen-Macaulay complexes. We conjecture that the result holds for all finite distributive lattices.

1954 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-77
Author(s):  
H. A. Thueston

Among the many papers on the subject of lattices I have not seen any simple discussion of the congruences on a distributive lattice. It is the purpose of this note to give such a discussion for lattices with a certain finiteness. Any distributive lattice is isomorphic with a ring of sets (G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, revised edition, 1948, p. 140, corollary to Theorem 6); I take the case where the sets are finite. All finite distributive lattices are covered by this case.


1972 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert S. Gaskill

In this note we examine the relationship of a distributive lattice to its lattice of ideals. Our main result is that a distributive lattice and its lattice of ideals share exactly the same collection of finite sublattices. In addition we give a related result characterizing those finite distributive lattices L which can be embedded in a lattice L′ whenever they can be embedded in its lattice of ideals T(L′).


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yizhi Chen ◽  
Xianzhong Zhao

LetLbe a distributive lattice andMn,q(L)(Mn(L), resp.) the semigroup (semiring, resp.) ofn×q(n×n, resp.) matrices overL. In this paper, we show that if there is a subdirect embedding from distributive latticeLto the direct product∏i=1m‍Liof distributive latticesL1,L2, …,Lm, then there will be a corresponding subdirect embedding from the matrix semigroupMn,q(L)(semiringMn(L), resp.) to semigroup∏i=1m‍Mn,q(Li)(semiring∏i=1m‍Mn(Li), resp.). Further, it is proved that a matrix over a distributive lattice can be decomposed into the sum of matrices over some of its special subchains. This generalizes and extends the decomposition theorems of matrices over finite distributive lattices, chain semirings, fuzzy semirings, and so forth. Finally, as some applications, we present a method to calculate the indices and periods of the matrices over a distributive lattice and characterize the structures of idempotent and nilpotent matrices over it. We translate the characterizations of idempotent and nilpotent matrices over a distributive lattice into the corresponding ones of the binary Boolean cases, which also generalize the corresponding structures of idempotent and nilpotent matrices over general Boolean algebras, chain semirings, fuzzy semirings, and so forth.


2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-282
Author(s):  
Jonathan David Farley

AbstractLet L be a finite distributive lattice. Let Sub0(L) be the lattice﹛S | S is a sublattice of L﹜ [ ﹛∅﹜ and let ℓ*[Sub0(L)] be the length of the shortest maximal chain in Sub0(L). It is proved that if K and L are non-trivial finite distributive lattices, then ℓ*[Sub0(K × L)] = ℓ*[Sub0(K)] + ℓ[Sub0(L)]. A conjecture from the 1984 Banff Conference on Graphs and Order is thus proved.


Author(s):  
Zsolt Lengvárszky ◽  
George F. McNulty

AbstractThe covering relation in the lattice of subuniverses of a finite distributive lattices is characterized in terms of how new elements in a covering sublattice fit with the sublattice covered. In general, although the lattice of subuniverses of a finite distributive lattice will not be modular, nevertheless we are able to show that certain instances of Dedekind's Transposition Principle still hold. Weakly independent maps play a key role in our arguments.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 612-621
Author(s):  
CLIFFORD SMYTH

We generalize Reimer's Inequality [6] (a.k.a. the BKR Inequality or the van den Berg–Kesten Conjecture [1]) to the setting of finite distributive lattices.


Order ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Köhler

AbstractThe paper presents a method of composing finite distributive lattices from smaller pieces and applies this to construct the finitely generated free distributive lattices from appropriate Boolean parts.


Author(s):  
Gezahagne Mulat Addis

For a given ideal [Formula: see text] of an almost distributive lattice [Formula: see text], we study the smallest and the largest congruence relation on [Formula: see text] having [Formula: see text] as a congruence class.


Author(s):  
G. Grätzer ◽  
H. Lakser ◽  
E. T. Schmidt

AbstractLet K and L be lattices, and let ϕ be a homomorphism of K into L.Then ϕ induces a natural 0-preserving join-homomorphism of Con K into Con L.Extending a result of Huhn, the authors proved that if D and E are finite distributive lattices and ψ is a 0-preserving join-homomorphism from D into E, then D and E can be represented as the congruence lattices of the finite lattices K and L, respectively, such that ψ is the natural 0-preserving join-homomorphism induced by a suitable homomorphism ϕ: K → L. Let m and n denote the number of join-irreducible elements of D and E, respectively, and let k = max (m, n). The lattice L constructed was of size O(22(n+m)) and of breadth n+m.We prove that K and L can be constructed as ‘small’ lattices of size O(k5) and of breadth three.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document