Performance Evaluation and Quality Assurance in Digital Subtraction Angiography

10.37206/14 ◽  
1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maynard High ◽  
Gerald Cohen ◽  
Pei-Jan Paul Lin ◽  
Arthur Olson ◽  
Lawrence Rothenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Digital Subtraction Angiography ◽  
Digital Subtraction

Feasibility of intraoperative angioembolization for trauma patients using C-arm digital subtraction angiography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Alnumay ◽  
Natasha Caminsky ◽  
Jules Hugo Eustache ◽  
David Valenti ◽  
Andrew Neil Beckett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Subtraction Angiography ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Digital Subtraction

scholarly journals Value of Three-Dimensional Digital Subtraction Angiography for Detection and Classification of Intracranial Aneurysm Remnants After Clipping

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge Marbacher ◽  
Matthias Halter ◽  
Deborah R Vogt ◽  
Jenny C Kienzler ◽  
Christian T J Magyar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysm ◽  
Digital Subtraction Angiography ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
P Value ◽  
Digital Subtraction ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
2D And 3D

Abstract BACKGROUND The current gold standard for evaluation of the surgical result after intracranial aneurysm (IA) clipping is two-dimensional (2D) digital subtraction angiography (DSA). While there is growing evidence that postoperative 3D-DSA is superior to 2D-DSA, there is a lack of data on intraoperative comparison. OBJECTIVE To compare the diagnostic yield of detection of IA remnants in intra- and postoperative 3D-DSA, categorize the remnants based on 3D-DSA findings, and examine associations between missed 2D-DSA remnants and IA characteristics. METHODS We evaluated 232 clipped IAs that were examined with intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, IA and remnant distinguishing characteristics, and 2D- and 3D-DSA findings. Maximal IA remnant size detected by 3D-DSA was measured using a 3-point scale of 2-mm increments. RESULTS Although 3D-DSA detected all clipped IA remnants, 2D-DSA missed 30.4% (7 of 23) and 38.9% (14 of 36) clipped IA remnants in intraoperative and postoperative imaging, respectively (95% CI: 30 [ 12, 49] %; P-value .023 and 39 [23, 55] %; P-value = <.001), and more often missed grade 1 (< 2 mm) clipped remnants (odds ratio [95% CI]: 4.3 [1.6, 12.7], P-value .005). CONCLUSION Compared with 2D-DSA, 3D-DSA achieves a better diagnostic yield in the evaluation of clipped IA. Our proposed method to grade 3D-DSA remnants proved to be simple and practical. Especially small IA remnants have a high risk to be missed in 2D-DSA. We advocate routine use of either intraoperative or postoperative 3D-DSA as a baseline for lifelong follow-up of clipped IA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document