scholarly journals Role of cefditoren in the treatment of community skin and soft tissue infections: revisiting the evidence

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Dafne Cabañero-Navalón ◽  
Víctor García-Bustos ◽  
Miguel Salavert Lletí ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Streptococcus Pyogenes ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Oral Cephalosporin ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Anaerobic Microorganisms ◽  
Cure Rates

Cefditoren pivoxil is a third-generation oral cephalosporin with extended spectrum against Gram-negative, Gram-positive, and several anaerobic microorganisms, including those frequently implicated in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Despite the fact that there are no approved breakpoint criteria for cefditoren susceptibility, many pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies reassert cefditoren as a good oral antibiotic for the treatment of SSTI. Regarding patients with SSTI, including those infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus y Streptococcus pyogenes, cefditoren showed high cure rates when compared to other oral cephalosporins.

The role of Gram-negative bacteria in skin and soft tissue infections

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Russo ◽  
Enrico Maria Trecarichi ◽  
Carlo Torti
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Gram Negative

Empirical antibiotic therapy of complicated skin and soft tissue infections in dermatological practice

2011 ◽  
Vol 152 (7) ◽  
pp. 252-258
Author(s):  
Andrea Magyar ◽  
Edina Garaczi ◽  
Edit Hajdú ◽  
Lajos Kemény
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Streptococcus Pyogenes ◽  
Anaerobic Bacteria ◽  
Empirical Therapy ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Empirical Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Complicated Skin

Erysipelas is an acute bacterial infection of the skin predominantly caused by Streptococcus pyogenes. According to the international classification complicated erysipelas belongs to the complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Complicated infections are defined as severe skin involvement or when the infection occurs in compromised hosts. These infections frequently involve Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobic bacteria. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the empirical antibiotic therapy for the patients who were admitted to the Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged. Methods: The empirical therapy was started according to a previously determined protocol. The data of 158 patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections were analyzed and the microbiology culture specimens and the isolates were also examined. Results and conclusions: The results show that penicillin is the first choice for the treatment of erysipelas. However, the complicated skin and soft tissue infections require broad-spectrum antibiotics. Orv. Hetil., 2011, 152, 252–258.

scholarly journals ST93-Queensland community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone in France: outbreak in a scout camp and sporadic cases, July to August 2012

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (44) ◽  
Author(s):  
T X Nhan ◽  
M Bes ◽  
H Meugnier ◽  
L Toko ◽  
G Julienne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Sporadic Cases ◽  
Panton Valentine Leukocidin ◽  
Valentine Leukocidin

We describe the occurrence in France of a Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL)-positive meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST93 clone, a predominant community-acquired (CA)-MRSA in Australia. In July to August 2012, an outbreak in a scout camp (n=3) and sporadic cases (n=2) of skin and soft tissue infections were reported. Investigations suggested importation of the clone through travel and onward transmission. This illustrates the epidemic potential of this lineage and the role of travellers in the spread of PVL-positive CA-MRSA.

scholarly journals 289. Impact of Clinician Specialty on the Use of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Definitive Treatment of Uncomplicated Bloodstream Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S144-S145
Author(s):  
Jasmine R Marcelin ◽  
Mackenzie R Keintz ◽  
Jihyun Ma ◽  
Erica J Stohs ◽  
Bryan Alexander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Oral Antibiotic ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Oral Antibiotic Therapy

Abstract Background No established guidelines exist regarding the role of oral antibiotic therapy (OAT) to treat uncomplicated bloodstream infections (uBSIs) and practices may vary depending on clinician specialty and experience. Methods An IRB-exempt web-based survey was emailed to Nebraska Medicine clinicians caring for hospitalized patients, and widely disseminated using social media. The survey was open access and once disseminated on social media, it was impossible to ascertain the total number of individuals who received the survey. Chi-squared analysis for categorical data was conducted to evaluate the association between responses and demographic groups. Results Of 275 survey responses, 51% were via social media, and 94% originated in the United States. Two-thirds of respondents were physicians, 16% pharmacists, and infectious diseases clinicians (IDC) represented 71% of respondents. The syndromes where most were comfortable using OAT routinely for uBSI were urinary tract infection (92%), pneumonia (82%), pyelonephritis (82%), and skin/soft tissue infections (69%). IDC were more comfortable routinely using OAT to treat uBSIs associated with vertebral osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections than non-infectious diseases clinicians (NIDC), but NIDC were more likely to report comfort with routine use of OAT to treat uBSIs associated with meningitis and skin/soft tissue infections. IDC were more likely to report comfort with routine use of OAT for uBSIs due to Enterobacteriaceae and gram-positive anaerobes, while NIDC were more likely to be comfortable with routinely using OAT to treat uBSIs associated with S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and gram-positive bacilli. In one clinical vignette of S. aureus uBSI due to debrided abscess, 11% of IDC would be comfortable using OAT vs 28% of NIDC; IDC were more likely to report routinely repeating blood cultures (99% vs 83%, p< 0.05). Figure 1: Clinician comfort using oral antibiotic therapy to treat uncomplicated bacteremia due to specific syndromes Figure 2: Clinician comfort using oral antibiotic therapy to treat uncomplicated bacteremia due to specific organisms Conclusion Considerable variation in comfort using OAT for uBSIs among IDC vs NIDC exists, highlighting opportunities for IDC to continue to demonstrate their value in clinical practice. Understanding the reasons for variability may be helpful in creating best practice guidelines to standardize decision making. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document