scholarly journals Ivan Dziuba as a figure: opinions of present-day intellectuals

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 74-91
Author(s):  
Mykola Mušynka ◽  
Yaroslav Yatskiv ◽  
Mykhailo Andreychyn ◽  
Tamara Hundorova ◽  
Marko Pavlyshyn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Critic ◽  
90Th Anniversary ◽  
Science And Culture

In this article, Ivan Dziuba is seen as a public influencer, literary critic, co-chairman of the main editorial board of the Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. On his 90th anniversary, a combination of short communications by famous representatives in sphere of Ukrainian science and culture presented is presented here.

Special session of the Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk Editorial Board honoring the 90th anniversary of the journal (19 November 2008)

2009 ◽  
Vol 179 (6) ◽  
pp. 561
Author(s):  
Vitalii L. Ginzburg ◽  
Igor M. Dremin ◽  
D.V. Shirkov ◽  
Boris M. Smirnov ◽  
Evgenii B. Aleksandrov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Special Session ◽  
90Th Anniversary

scholarly journals Wspomnienie o prof. Stanisławie Jaworskim

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Burzyńska
Keyword(s):  
Literary Critic ◽  
Long Time

Professor Stanisław Jaworski, the prominent literary theoretician and historian, literary critic, poet, worker of the Faculty of Polish Studies at the Jagiellonian University and the long-time member of the editorial board and editor-in-chief of “Ruch Literacki” died on 15th July 2018.

The Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine: The Most Widely Read Pathology Journal Today

2016 ◽  
Vol 140 (9) ◽  
pp. 953-955
Author(s):  
Timothy Craig Allen
Keyword(s):  
Digital Pathology ◽  
Medical Knowledge ◽  
Laboratory Medicine ◽  
Official Journal ◽  
Pathology Laboratory ◽  
Dynamic Leadership ◽  
General Pathology ◽  
90Th Anniversary ◽  
Whole Slide Images

The Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine was first published in 1926 as a subspecialty journal of the American Medical Association. It became the official journal of the College of American Pathologists in 1995. Under the dynamic leadership of its most recent editor-in-chief, Philip T. Cagle, MD, and his vibrant editorial board, the Archives has nearly doubled its impact factor and become the most widely read general pathology journal today. Dr Cagle has consistently added leading pathologists to the editorial board, and the collective expertise of these individuals is clearly evident in new, cutting-edge journal masthead sections. The Archives has featured innovative content in the field of digital pathology, including articles on the utilization of smart phones in pathology and incorporation of whole-slide images and videos into the content of articles. Special sections have characterized the Archives during the current editorial board's tenure and have proven immensely popular with the journal's readership. As the Archives celebrates its 90th anniversary, its editorial board remains committed to providing insightful and relevant medical knowledge. The journal's open access Web site (www.archivesofpathology.org) allows the dissemination of this knowledge to every corner of the globe at no expense to those who wish to be educated or improve their medical practice.

scholarly journals On the History of the Academic Series “Literary Heritage” (for the 90th Anniversary)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-465
Author(s):  
Daria S. Moskovskaya
Keyword(s):  
Central Committee ◽  
Editorial Office ◽  
Russian Symbolism ◽  
90Th Anniversary ◽  
Literary Heritage ◽  
Publishing Policy ◽  
History Of ◽  
Political Trials ◽  
New Generation

The article examines the history of the publication of the academic series Literary Heritage based on new archival materials. The publication was initiated in 1931, when archival and publishing activities were affected by political trials. The author of the draft used political rhetoric to get permission to publish it from the Central Committee of the CPSU(b). In 1932, following the decree “On the Restructuring of Literary and Artistic Organizations,” Literary Heritage became an exemplary academic publication and received international recognition. Literary Heritage developed a new method as it placed the author in the position of a student at the editorial board. In Soviet times, the Literary Heritage existed under the conditions of censorship and ideological control but still managed to publish a volume on Russian symbolism in 1937. The years 1947–1959 were difficult for Literary Heritage when the editorial office was accused of cosmopolitanism. In its publishing policy, Literary Heritage was ahead of time and above the reader’s dogmatism which led to the sequestration of several volumes. The history of Literary Heritage contributed to creating an intellectual and ideological platform that nurtured a new generation of literary historians.

scholarly journals To the 90th anniversary of the famous linguist, literary critic, Turkologist Kulmat Omiraliev

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Ж. Манкеева ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Literary Critic ◽  
90Th Anniversary

Қазақ тілі тарихын тереңдете зерттеуге, қазақ әдебиетінің тарихы мен теориясын ғылыми тұрғыдан жаңаша байыптауға, түркі жазба ескерткіштерін тың көзқараспен зерделеуге зор үлес қосып, артына елеулі мұра қалдырған лингвист, әдебиет зерттеушісі, түрколог Құлмат Өмірәлиев қазіргі Түркістан облысы Қазығұрт ауданының Алтын ауылында 1930 жылы 10 қарашада дүниеге келген. Қаршадайынан еңбекке араласып, мектепте оқып жүрген кезінде Жарлытөбеде есепші-табельші, мал дәрігері (1947 жж. ветеринарлық техникумды тәмамдаған), Қаратаста аудандық газеттің жауапты хатшысы ретін де қызмет етіп үлгереді (1948-1950 жж.). Шымкенттегі мұғалімдер институтының қазақ тілі мен әдебиеті факультетін үздік бітірген соң (1951 ж.), орта мектепте қазақ тілі мен әдебиеті пәндерінен мұғалім, оқу бөлімінің меңгерушісі болып істейді.

Archbishop Ambrose (Shchurov) in the memoirs of representatives of the orthodox intelligentsia of Ivanovo region

2020 ◽  
pp. 129-142
Author(s):  
Alexey Fedotov
Keyword(s):  
Personal Experience ◽  
Scientific Journal ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Considerable Contribution ◽  
The World ◽  
90Th Anniversary ◽  
The Church

The article considers the significance of the personality of Archbishop Ambrose (Shchurov), who managed the diocese of Ivanovo (IvanovoVoznesensk) and Kineshma in 1977—2006 for the formation of the Orthodox intelligentsia in the Ivanovo region in 1990—2006. The memoirs of its representatives are given, reflecting their personal experience of communication with the Arch-pastor. Archbishop Ambrose was for many years a member of the editorial Board of the scientific journal “Intelligentsia and the world”. The article is devoted to the 90th anniversary since the birth of this Hierarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, who made a considerable contribution to building dialogue between the Church and the intelligentsia in the region, and many Church representatives of intelligentsia.

REVIEWERS FOR VOLUME 73

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-375
Keyword(s):  
Advisory Board ◽  
Editorial Advisory

Many papers submitted to the Edinburgh Journal of Botany are reviewed by members of the Editorial Board and Editorial Advisory Board. The members of both Boards wish to express their thanks to the following, who have also kindly reviewed papers during the preparation of this volume.

Clinical Science in the 1990s

1990 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
M. J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Medical Research ◽  
Review Process ◽  
Molecular Level ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Clinical Science ◽  
Molecular Medicine ◽  
Mutual Benefit ◽  
Real Progress ◽  
General Journal

From this issue, Clinical Science will increase its page numbers from an average of 112 to 128 per monthly issue. This welcome change — equivalent to at least two manuscripts — has been ‘forced’ on us by the increasing pressure on space; this has led to an undesirable increase in the delay between acceptance and publication, and to a fall in the proportion of submitted manuscripts we have been able to accept. The change in page numbers will instead permit us now to return to our exceptionally short interval between acceptance and publication of 3–4 months; and at the same time we shall be able not only to accept (as now) those papers requiring little or no revision, but also to offer hope to some of those papers which have raised our interest but come to grief in review because of a major but remediable problem. Our view, doubtless unoriginal, has been that the review process, which is unusually thorough for Clinical Science, involving a specialist editor and two external referees, is most constructive when it helps the evolution of a good paper from an interesting piece of research. Traditionally, the papers in Clinical Science have represented some areas of research more than others. However, this has reflected entirely the pattern of papers submitted to us, rather than any selective interest of the Editorial Board, which numbers up to 35 scientists covering most areas of medical research. Arguably, after the explosion during the last decade of specialist journals, the general journal can look forward to a renaissance in the 1990s, as scientists in apparently different specialities discover that they are interested in the same substances, asking similar questions and developing techniques of mutual benefit to answer these questions. This situation arises from the trend, even among clinical scientists, to recognize the power of research based at the cellular and molecular level to achieve real progress, and at this level the concept of organ-based specialism breaks down. It is perhaps ironic that this journal, for a short while at the end of the 1970s, adopted — and then discarded — the name of Clinical Science and Molecular Medicine, since this title perfectly represents the direction in which clinical science, and therefore Clinical Science, is now progressing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document