scholarly journals SOME ASPECTS REGARDING THE TIME CRITERION IN THE OECD-MC

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stoycho Dulevski ◽  

The Double Tax Treaties (DTTs) are an important regulator in international taxation. Their provisions outline the prerequisites, which implementation determines their proper application. It is noteworthy that time criterion is derived in some of them. This necessitates their examination both from theoretical and practical perspective.

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 312
Author(s):  
Shkumbin Asllani

In today’s international taxation most of the developing countries enter into tax treaties which are drafted in line with the OECD MC to eliminate double taxation. Yet, is well-known fact that tax treaties in practice are abused by tax payers, therefore, majority of states have introduce legislation specifically designed to prevent tax avoidance and protect their domestic interests. In legal practice and literature the act of overriding international tax treaties and denying treaty benefits in favour of domestic law provisions threatens main principle of international law and therefore is questionable to what extend the relationship between domestic law and international tax treaty agreements bridges the international norms.


2020 ◽  
pp. 342-349

The double tax treaties (DTT) are an important regulator in international tax law. The Preamble to them defines their aim and purpose – to reduce taxation through tax evasion and avoidance in the field of taxes on income and capital. It should be noted that they do not create new taxes, but they are supranational international agreements ensuring the fair tax treatment between states. According to the Art. 5, para 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Bulgaria, the international agreements such as the DTTs are part of the domestic law if they have been ratified, promulgated and entered into force. After the fulfilment of the three cumulative conditions, they take precedence over the domestic legislation for any conflicts. The aim of the current study, with no claim to completeness and comprehensiveness, is to outline the scope of Art. 17 of the Model Tax Convention of Income and Capital of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD-MC) on the taxation of entertainers and sportspersons. The analysis will begin with a brief historical review. For this purpose, the last three versions of the Commentary of the OECD-MC (the Commentary) will be examined. The author will also focus on relevant international and domestic practical issues on the topic as well as a brief overview of the concluded DTTs between Bulgaria and other states. Finally, some thoughts will be expressed on the future development of the concept.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
I. A. Khavanova

The subject of the article. The article represents a research of conceptual properties and issues of applying reservations and declarations to the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting, developed in frames of implementing the OECD/G20 Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). The Multilateral Tax Convention modifies the application of agreements for avoiding double taxation, that are covered by its action. Since January 1, 2021 it has been applied to 34 agreements for avoiding double taxation between the Russian Federation and such countries as the UK, Canada, Latvia, Malta, the Netherlands and France. The Multilateral Tax Convention provides for updating bilateral tax treaties – whether they were developed upon the OECD Model Tax Convention or the UN Model Tax convention. The Convention retains a great degree of flexibility in relation to the implementation of its provisions – especially by the means of reservations, made by the countries.The purpose of the article is to identify the main characteristics of applying reservations and declarations in international tax law.The methodology.The study is based on empirical methods of comparison and description, theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic.The main results. Reservations have played a minor role in international taxation until now – usually they reflected disagreement, expressed by an OECD member country with the provisions of the OECD Model Tax Convention or its Official commentary. Reservations were formulated in relation to a non-binding (model) document and their importance was limited. Such reservations cannot be associated with declarations, made in relation to legally binding documents like the Multilateral Tax Convention. Analyzing the general points of scientific dispute upon the mentioned range of issues, the author argues with researchers who deem that the structure of reservations to the Multilateral Tax Convention doesn’t correspond with the provisions over reservations in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969 and thus recognize those reservations as “legal hybrids”.Conclusions. The structure of reservations to the International Tax Convention is deter-mined by the nature of double taxation agreements. The model lawmaking principle (the use of the OECD Model Tax Convention) allowed developing “umbrella” architecture of relationships between the provisions of the Multilateral Tax Convention and the norms of double taxation agreements. The article categorizes types of reservations as reservations of general nature and treaty-specific reservations. The article also considers the specific properties of reservations made in relation to the provisions of the Convention, which com-pose a minimal standard.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Hilling

Abstract This section contains reviews of two Swedish books on international taxation. First, the book Skatteavtal och generalklausuler, Ett komparativt perspektiv (Tax Agreements and General Anti-Avoidance Regulations, A Comparative Perspective) is recommended for those who study and work with international tax law. The book analyses how tax treaties’ function to limit contracting states’ taxing powers relates to national GAARs. A comparative analysis is made between Sweden and Canada. In the second review, the doctoral dissertation EU-domstolens restirktionsprövning i mal om de grundläggande frihterna och direkta skatter (The EU Court of Justice’s examination of the restriction requirement in its direct tax case law) is reviewed. The dissertation systemizes relevant CJEU’s case law and analyzes the Courts reasoning in deciding whether or not certain tax regulation is in conflict with EU fundamental freedoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 747-769
Author(s):  
Céline Braumann

ABSTRACT Scholars of public international law have not paid attention to international tax law in the past. This article seeks to fill this vacuum and to foster cross-field research by studying customary international law in international tax law. It assesses the value of international tax law’s most prominent feature for the identification of custom: the dense network of almost identical, bilateral double tax treaties. The primacy of source-based taxation for business profits serves as a test case for this purpose. The International Law Commission’s conclusions on the identification of customary international law constitute the theoretical reference point that informs the empirical analysis. Thus, this article simultaneously serves as a treadmill test to appraise whether the International Law Commission’s conclusions actually offer practical guidance. The analysis culminates in the conclusion that tax treaties have only little value for the identification of customary international law. First, tax treaties alone do not entail representative state practice. Second, tax treaties give rise to the pitfalls of the Baxter paradox. Third, the tax treaty network yields no evidence that any state practice originates from opinio juris. Judging by the evidence brought into play so far, states likely display uniform treaty practice in international taxation because they believe it is in their best interest, not due to any legal conviction.


1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Lupker ◽  
Tamsen E. Taylor ◽  
Penny M. Pexman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document