scholarly journals Classification of Anxiety Disorders using Machine Learning Methods: A Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Muhammad ◽  
Basri Ashjan ◽  
Melibari Ghufran ◽  
Sindi Taghreed ◽  
Alghamdi Nada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

scholarly journals Systematic literature review of machine learning methods used in the analysis of real-world data for patient-provider decision making

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Brnabic ◽  
Lisa M. Hess
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Systematic Literature Review ◽  
Real World ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

Abstract Background Machine learning is a broad term encompassing a number of methods that allow the investigator to learn from the data. These methods may permit large real-world databases to be more rapidly translated to applications to inform patient-provider decision making. Methods This systematic literature review was conducted to identify published observational research of employed machine learning to inform decision making at the patient-provider level. The search strategy was implemented and studies meeting eligibility criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Relevant data related to study design, statistical methods and strengths and limitations were identified; study quality was assessed using a modified version of the Luo checklist. Results A total of 34 publications from January 2014 to September 2020 were identified and evaluated for this review. There were diverse methods, statistical packages and approaches used across identified studies. The most common methods included decision tree and random forest approaches. Most studies applied internal validation but only two conducted external validation. Most studies utilized one algorithm, and only eight studies applied multiple machine learning algorithms to the data. Seven items on the Luo checklist failed to be met by more than 50% of published studies. Conclusions A wide variety of approaches, algorithms, statistical software, and validation strategies were employed in the application of machine learning methods to inform patient-provider decision making. There is a need to ensure that multiple machine learning approaches are used, the model selection strategy is clearly defined, and both internal and external validation are necessary to be sure that decisions for patient care are being made with the highest quality evidence. Future work should routinely employ ensemble methods incorporating multiple machine learning algorithms.

Machine Learning methods for micro-FTIR imaging classification of human skin tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matheus del Valle ◽  
Kleber Stancari ◽  
Pedro Arthur Augusto de Castro ◽  
Moises Oliveira dos Santos ◽  
Denise Maria Zezell
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Human Skin ◽  
Skin Tumors ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Ftir Imaging ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Imaging Classification

scholarly journals Classification of HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors by Machine Learning Methods

ACS Omega ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 15837-15849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Li ◽  
Yujia Tian ◽  
Zijian Qin ◽  
Aixia Yan
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Protease Inhibitors ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Hiv 1

scholarly journals Seeing It All: Evaluating Supervised Machine Learning Methods for the Classification of Diverse Otariid Behaviours

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e0166898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monique A. Ladds ◽  
Adam P. Thompson ◽  
David J. Slip ◽  
David P. Hocking ◽  
Robert G. Harcourt
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document