scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anxiety among Children and Youth in Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bifftu Berhanu Boru ◽  
Guracho Yonas Deressa
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e043722
Author(s):  
Naomi Priest ◽  
Kate Doery ◽  
Mandy Truong ◽  
Shuaijun Guo ◽  
Ryan Perry ◽  
...  

IntroductionRacism is a critical determinant of health and health inequities for children and youth. This protocol aims to update the first systematic review conducted by Priest et al (2013), including a meta-analysis of findings. Based on previous empirical data, it is anticipated that child and youth health will be negatively impacted by racism. Findings from this review will provide updated evidence of effect sizes across outcomes and identify moderators and mediators of relationships between racism and health.Methods and analysisThis systematic review and meta-analysis will include studies that examine associations between experiences of racism and racial discrimination with health outcomes of children and youth aged 0–24 years. Exposure measures include self-reported or proxy reported systemic, interpersonal and intrapersonal racism. Outcome measures include general health and well-being, physical health, mental health, biological markers, healthcare utilisation and health behaviours. A comprehensive search of studies from the earliest time available to October 2020 will be conducted. A random effects meta-analysis will examine the average effect of racism on a range of health outcomes. Study-level moderation will test the difference in effect sizes with regard to various sample and exposure characteristics. This review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.Ethics and disseminationThis review will provide evidence for future research within the field and help to support policy and practice development. Results will be widely disseminated to both academic and non-academic audiences through peer-review publications, community summaries and presentations to research, policy, practice and community audiences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020184055.


2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. S23-S24
Author(s):  
Milena Cioana ◽  
Jiawen Deng ◽  
Ajantha Nadarajah ◽  
Maggie Hou ◽  
Yuan Qiu ◽  
...  

CMAJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. E35-E46 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Peirson ◽  
D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis ◽  
K. Morrison ◽  
R. Warren ◽  
M. Usman Ali ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florence Perquier ◽  
Sarah Hetrick ◽  
Terri Rodak ◽  
Xin Jing ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Suicide is a leading cause of death in children and youth, with suicidal thoughts and suicide attempts (referred to as non-fatal suicidal behaviors (NFSB)) being among its strongest predictors. Positive parenting (e.g., warmth, responsiveness), negative parenting (e.g., control, hostility), and parent-child relationship quality (e.g., trust, communication) have been reported to be associated with differences in NFSB in this population. To date, no comprehensive systematic review has considered together the wide range of parenting factors studied in relation to NFSB, and no meta-analysis of existing findings has been conducted. The present study will critically appraise and synthesize the existing evidence from observational studies that examine the relationships between parenting factors and (i) suicidal ideation and (ii) suicide attempt in children and youth. Methods Studies will be retrieved from APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases. Retrospective, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies, conducted in clinical and population settings, among youth aged less than 25 years and published as articles and dissertations in English or French will be eligible. Two reviewers will select articles using the Covidence Software after title and abstract screening and full-text assessment, will extract information using double data entry, and will appraise studies’ quality using the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Any disagreements will be discussed with a third reviewer. Publication bias will be evaluated using funnel plots and Egger’s test. In addition to a narrative summary of results, meta-analyses will be conducted using results from at least three studies. Three-level random effect models will allow to derive pooled estimates from dependent effect sizes (from the same sample or study). In case of significant heterogeneity, moderation analyses will be performed considering participants’ characteristics and methodological aspects of studies. The results will be reported according to the PRISMA guidelines, and the certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. Discussion In highlighting parenting factors associated with NFSB and in estimating the overall strength of these associations in children and youth, our results will inform further intervention and prevention strategies designed for young people experiencing NFSB and their families. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020165345


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guro Pauck Øglund ◽  
Maria Hildebrand ◽  
Ulf Ekelund

The purpose of this systematic review was to explore whether birth weight, early growth and motor development act as determinants of physical activity in children and youth.Methods:We performed a systematic literature search on the possible early life determinants. A meta-analysis was performed on the association between birthweight and objectively measured physical activity.Results:We identified 9 studies examining birth weight, in which none of the studies with objectively measured physical activity observed an association between birth weight and physical activity. The meta-analysis confirmed this result (b=-3.08, 95% CI -10.20, 4.04). The 3 studies examining early growth and physical activity in youth differ in methodology and the results are inconsistent. Two studies suggest an association between earlier motor development and physical activity and sport participation in youth. This was not confirmed in a third study.Conclusion:Our meta-analysis suggests that birth weight is not an important determinant of physical activity in youth. Available data does not allow firm conclusions whether early growth and motor development act as determinants of physical activity in youth.


2019 ◽  
Vol 215 ◽  
pp. 178-186.e16
Author(s):  
Esther Ubago-Guisado ◽  
Iván Cavero-Redondo ◽  
Celia Alvarez-Bueno ◽  
Dimitris Vlachopoulos ◽  
Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno ◽  
...  

CMAJ Open ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. E23-E33 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Peirson ◽  
D. Fitzpatrick-Lewis ◽  
K. Morrison ◽  
D. Ciliska ◽  
M. Kenny ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document