Komparasi Kemampuan Penalaran matematis mahasiswa ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-153
Author(s):  
Farah Heniati Santosa ◽  
Habib Ratu Perwira Negara ◽  
Indrawati ◽  
Samsul Bahri ◽  
Samsuriadi
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
First Semester ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Quasi Experiment

This study aims to obtain a picture of the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtain PBL learning in terms of cognitive fields dependent and field independent. This research is a quasi-experiment involving 97 first semester students. Analysis of the study used one way ANAVA. The research instruments were cognitive style tests and mathematical reasoning abilities tests. The results of the study concluded that there are differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities that have field dependent and field independent cognitive styles, that is, students with independent field cognitive styles have better mathematical reasoning abilities compared to students with field dependent cognitive styles.

scholarly journals Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies and Cognitive Style: The Impact and Interaction on Students' Mathematical Reasoning Abilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 841-848
Author(s):  
Agus Setiawan Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Collaborative Problem Solving ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Collaborative Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

This study aims at identifying the effect of collaborative problem solving (CPS) learning strategies on students' mathematical reasoning abilities with different cognitive styles, namely field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FD). This study is a quasi-experimental study with a 2x2 factorial design. A total of 103 students of SMPN 3 Mesuji, Indonesia as research subjects. Mathematical reasoning ability data were obtained from essay tests and cognitive style data were obtained from the GEFT test. Data analysis used two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The results of this study are: 1) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who received collaborative problem solving and direct instruction learning strategies, 2) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who had field dependent and field independent cognitive styles, 3) there was no significant interaction between different learning strategies (collaborative problem solving and direct instruction) and cognitive styles (field dependent and field independent) on mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals Analysis of Mathematics Literation Capability in Cube and Beam Materials on Mts Students Reviewed from Dependent and Independent Field Kognitiffield Style

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
YL Sukestiyarno and Mellawaty .
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Right

This research is a descriptive qualitative research which aims to describe the mathematical literacy skills of the material of cubes and beams of class VIII A students at MTsN 2 Indramayu that it be seen in terms of cognitive styles of dependent fields and independent fields. Data will be whereas to describe the ability of mathematical literacy using observation; interview test; documentation. Data from this study were analyzed using Miles and Huberman (2007) data analysis which consisted of data reduction,datapresentation,andconclusiondrawing.Theresultsofthisstudyindicate that students in the Field Dependent cognitive style use the concept and the steps of the test work are still not appropriate. While students in Field Independent cognitive style use the right concepts and work steps. The advice given is that the teacher should provide balanced proportions in giving individual and group assignments to students (more conical).

scholarly journals ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL CERITA PADA MATERI PROGRAM LINEAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Astri Andriyani
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Linear Program ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
The Subject

Abstrak: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesalahan-kesalahan yang dilakukan siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Pabelan dengan gaya kognitif field independent, field independent semi, field dependent semi , dan field dependent dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita Program Linear. Gaya kognitif diukur dengan menggunakan tes GEFT. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah  siswa dengan gaya kognitif FI, FIS, FDS, dan FD. Berdasarkan hasil tes dan wawancara diketahui bahwa subjek FI melakukan kesalahan teknik, subjek FIS melakukan kesalahan teknik dan konseptual, subjek FDS melakukan kesalahan konseptual dan prosedural, dan subjek FD melakukan kesalahan kesalahan konseptual, prosedural, dan teknik Abstract:  This is a qualitative descriptive research. The purpose of the research is to know the faults of eleventh grade students of SMA N 1 Pabelan in solving /finishing story questions of linear program using cognitive styles field independent, field independent semi, field dependent semi , and field dependent cognitive styles is measured by GEFT. The subject of this research is the student with FI cognitive style, FIS, FDS, and FD. Based on the result of test and interview, the subject of FI did technique fault, FIS subject did technique and conceptual fauld, FDS subject did conceptual and procedural fauld, and FD subject did conceptual, procedural, and technique fauld

scholarly journals The effect of problem based learning by cognitive style on critical thinking skills and student retention

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Punadji Setyosari ◽  
Cholis Sa’dijah ◽  
Dedi Kuswandi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of learning models to develop student critical thinking skills and retention in mathematics through the application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) models and multimedia assisted Direct Instruction (DI) models for students who have different cognitive styles. This research is quasi-experimental type, using non-equivalent control group design. Subject of this research are students in three different senior high school with two class samples in each school. There are 102 students of control class with Direct Instruction learning model by multimedia and 97 students of experiment class with Problem Based Learning model. The instrument of this research are test and questionnaires. The findings of this research are that there are significant differences in student critical thinking skills and retention between groups of student with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles and also between group of student with Direct Instruction model and Problem Based Learning model. Each learning model has interaction with critical thinking skills but not student retention. This research is useful for educators to develop students critical thinking skills processes with an effective learning model approach especially for senior high school students. The educators can know the interaction of cognitive styles with student retention, the extent to which cognitive styles are able to have an impact on student retention. This research provides knowledge an effective learning model to develop critical thinking skills and retention of student both Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style. Based on cognitive style, Field Independent students have higher retention and critical thinking skills compared to Field Dependent students.

scholarly journals Metaphorical Thinking of Students in Solving Algebraic Problems based on Their Cognitive Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-89
Author(s):  
Muthmainnah Muthmainnah ◽  
Marwan Ramli ◽  
M Ikhsan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metaphorical Thinking ◽  
Algebraic Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Banda Aceh

One of thinking concepts which connects real life to mathematics is called metaphorical thinking. Metaphor and modelling are two closely related concepts. Besides, each individual performs different cognitive styles, such as field independent (FI) and field dependent (FD) cognitive styles. This factor possibly leads to different metaphorical thinking in solving algebraic problems. The participants of this qualitative research consist of two students at grade 7 of one of junior high school in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, with FI and FD as their cognitive styles. Based on the findings, it is found that: 1) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FI cognitive style in solving the algebraic problem in the stage of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back is considered to achieve the target for each criteria of CREATE; 2) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FD cognitive style in solving the problem in the all four stages but could not reveal all criteria mentioned in CREATE. This happens as the student is unable to find the appropriate metaphor to the algebraic problem. Therefore, the student does not need to explain the suitability of the metaphor to the algebraic problem.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PAKET PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN GAYA KOGNITIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH LINGKUNGAN (Studi Eksperimen pada Jurusan Kimia, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Jakarta)

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68
Author(s):  
Agung Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Environmental Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Environmental Problems ◽  
Integrated Learning ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The objective of the research was aimed at finding out whether there is effect of the environmental education learning package and cognitive style on environmental problem solving skills. This research conducted was exsperiment methode. The target of population is the students at the Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the State University of Jakarta. Then accessible of population is Department of Chemistry and take it by randomly (n=40).The research came five conclusions are follow: the first, as a whole the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in an integrated package of environmental education is high than the monolithic environmental education learning package; the second, the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in field independent style cognitive is not high than the field dependent style cognitive; the third, interaction effect between learning and cognitive styles environmental education package; the fourth, the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on cognitive style of field dependent on an integrated learning package environmental education lower than on learning environmental education monolithic package, and the five, there is the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on field independent cognitive styles in an integrated learning package environmental education is high than on learning environmental education monolithic package.

Effect of Cognitive Style on Strategies for Comprehension of Prose

1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayo Adejumo
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Introductory Course ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Embedded Figures ◽  
Group Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Better Than

The effect of cognitive style on the performance of four groups who used different strategies of study to comprehend prose was investigated. Performance on Group Embedded Figures Test was used to classify subjects into groups by cognitive style. 201 field-dependent and 125 field-independent subjects enrolled in an introductory course in psychology were subjects. Field-independent subjects performed significantly better overall. In particular, field-independent subjects in the control group and the groups given factual and inferential questions as study aids performed better than the field-dependent subjects on the inferential items at posttest. On the factual items at posttest, field-independent subjects performed significantly better only in the group who were given inferential questions as an adjunct. The cognitive styles of the subjects interacted with the strategies of study and seem to affect performance on comprehension of prose at posttest.

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH ALJABAR BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD INDEPENDENT

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Tanti Erviana
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Related Information ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Main Instrument

This research aims to describe the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students with field-independent cognitive styles in solving algebra problems. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive approach, using qualitative data then described to produce a clear and detailed picture of students' mathematical reasoning with independent field cognitive style in solving algebra problems. The subjects of the research were Class VIII students’ of SMP Negeri 47 Surabaya. The main Instrument in this study is the researchers themselves. Instrument supporters in this research is divided into 2 kinds of Tests, namely the task of problem solving algebra, and guidelines for the interview. Data collection Techniques in the study carried out using two techniques, namely written tests and interviews. The process of data analysis in this study refers to qualitative data analysis process, namely the reduction of data, presenting the data, and draw conclusions. the results of this research indicate that (1) able to conduct an investigation of the problems faced thoroughly, (2) able to plan problem solving by connecting various related information, (3) able to use the strategy chosen correctly and correctly, and (4) able to re-examine, evaluate, and draw valid conclusions based on the solution of the problem obtained. In addition, the results of this study indicate that the level of mathematical reasoning ability of students is in the category sufficient to meet the mathematical reasoning indicators of field-independent cognitive style.

scholarly journals Analyzing students’ abstraction in learning common tangent lines of two circles based on cognitive styles

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-108
Author(s):  
Wirani Sumekar ◽  
Farida Nurhasanah ◽  
Sutopo Sutopo
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Prior Knowledge ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Common Tangent ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Independent Students ◽  
Cognitive Actions ◽  
And Task

[English]: This study was aimed to describe the abstraction process of students with different cognitive styles in learning common tangent lines of two circles using recognizing, building-with, and construction (RBC) model. This qualitative research collected data through questionnaires, written tests, and task-based interviews. Eight students with field-dependent and field-independent were involved as the subjects. The interview transcripts were analyzed and grouped into cognitive actions of the RBC model. Findings showed that to reach the stage of construction activities, field-dependent students tend to need guidance and more time in recognizing and constructing the concept of a common tangent of two circles using their prior knowledge. Meanwhile, field-independent students tend to directly recognize and construct the concept using their prior knowledge so that they successfully constructed the concept of common tangent lines of two circles. This study shows that (1) field-dependent students use their prior knowledge that relates to the concept of common tangent lines of two circles less than field-independent students who tend to be able to use most of their prior knowledge relevant to the concept of common tangent lines of two circles, and (2) students who has similar cognitive style may not show the same success in abstraction process. Keywords: Abstraction, Circles, Common tangent line, Cognitive style, RBC Model [Bahasa]: Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan abstraksi siswa SMP dengan gaya kognitif berbeda dalam mempelajari garis singgung pada dua lingkaran yang dianalisis menggunakan model RBC (Recognizing, Building-with, Construction). Data penelitian dikumpulkan melalui angket, tes tertulis, dan wawancara berbasis tugas. Delapan siswa dengan gaya kognitif field-dependent dan field-independent dipilih sebagai subjek penelitian. Data penelitian dianalisis berdasarkan rekaman wawancara yang sudah ditranskrip dan dikelompokkan berdasarkan tindakan kognitif model RBC. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa field-dependent cenderung memerlukan petunjuk dan waktu lebih lama untuk mengenali dan membangun konsep garis singgung pada dua lingkaran melalui pengetahuan terdahulu hingga sampai pada aktivitas konstruksi. Sementara siswa field-independent cenderung langsung mengenali dan membangun konsep garis singgung pada dua lingkaran melalui pengetahuan terdahulu sehingga berhasil mengkonstruksi konsep garis singgung pada dua lingkaran. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) siswa field-dependent lebih sedikit menggunakan pengetahuan terdahulu yang berkaitan dengan konsep garis singgung dua lingkaran daripada siswa field-independent yang cenderung dapat melihat sebagian besar pengetahuan lama yang relevan dengan konsep garis singgung dua lingkaran, (2) siswa dengan gaya kognitif yang sama belum tentu menunjukkan keberhasilan yang sama pada proses abstraksi. Kata kunci: Abstraksi, Dua lingkaran, Garis singgung, Gaya kognitif, Model RBC  

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Teori APOS (Action, Process, Object, Schema) Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent dan Field Independent

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Mochamad Jazim ◽  
Dinawati Trapsilasiwi ◽  
Randi Pratama Murtikusuma ◽  
Arifiatun Arifiatun
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Process Stage ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Mathematical Problems

This study aims to describe and analyze students' mathematical problem solving abilities based on theory of APOS (Action, Peocess, Object, Schema) in terms of Field Dependent and Field Independent Cognitive Style. It is descriptive research with qualitative approach. The research subjects are 34 students in class XI MIPA 1 SMA Nurul Islam Jember, they are grouped on cognitive style, they are 24 students having field independent cognitive style and 10 students having field dependent cognitive style. The method of data collection use a GEFT (Group Embedded Figure Test), test of problem solving abilities, , and interviews. The results of the data analysis of the problem solving ability test and interviews showed that at the action stage, students with the independent field cognitive style (FI) tended to be able to explain the meaning and information on the questions even though they did not write down what they knew. Students with the field dependent cognitive style (FD) tend to be able to write down the information contained in the questions, but have difficulty explaining the meaning of the questions. At the process stage, FI and FD students are able to model and explain the stages well, but FD still has errors in the resulting mathematical model. At the object stage, FI students tend to work on questions freely, while FD students tend to work on questions in detail or are fixated on completely arranged steps, FD students also have difficulty in explaining back the results of their work. At the schema stage, FI and FD students tend to be able to explain how to use the information contained at the object stage to be used at the schema stage. In general, students with a field independent cognitive style in solving mathematical problems tend to be free or not fixated on complete and detailed steps, and have an analytical nature, so they are able to sort out the important information contained in the questions. Students with a field dependent cognitive style in solving math problems tend to be bound or fixated with steps that are arranged in a complete and detailed manner. Keywords: mathematics problem solving, APOS theory, cognitive style

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document