scholarly journals ROLE OF STAGE ENDOSCOPIC VARICEAL BAND LIGATION IN TREATMENT OF CHILDREN WITH PORTAL HYPERTENSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 2133-2137
Author(s):  
Dariia I. Voroniak ◽  
Oleg S. Godik ◽  
Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk ◽  
Olena М. Shapoval ◽  
Viktoriia V. Piliponova
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Bleeding Prophylaxis

The aim: To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) after the first esophageal EVL session in children with PH according to endoscopic data. Materials and methods: EVL was performed to 39 patients with PH for the purpose of variceal bleeding primary and secondary prophylaxis. Results: Esophageal varices grade decrease was observed in 22 (56.41%) children. Cases of early rebleeding (within 14 days after EVL) were not registered. Eradication of varices was successful in 11 (28.2%) of patients. In 1 (2.56%) case the complication (bleeding) occurred while banding procedure. 1 (2.56%) patients had bleeding from gastric varices prior to a control endoscopy. Portal gastropathy grade changes were observed in 17 (43.59%) patients. Conclusions: EVL is a safe and effective method of esophageal varices bleeding prophylaxis. This method allows control the esophageal varices grade at different phases of PH treatment in children. Even one EVL session can decrease the grade of esophageal varices (р<0.001). The EVL effect on the severity of portal gastropathy (p=0.02) and on the red marks presence (p=0.005) was also determined. EVL reduced the risk of variceal rebleeding (р=0.05, RR=0.05 (95%CI 0.01-0.32)).

scholarly journals Outcome of Band Ligation in Esophageal Varices of Bangladeshi Children: A Tertiary Centre Experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salahuddin Mahmud ◽  
Syed Shafi Ahmed ◽  
Jahida Gulshan ◽  
Farhana Tasneem ◽  
Madhabi Baidya
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Clinical Situation ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Tertiary Centre ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Common Etiology ◽  
One Year

Background: Variceal bleeding is often a life threatening clinical situation in infants and children. Band ligation is the main endoscopic treatment for esophageal varices.Objective: To see the outcome of band ligation of esophageal varices in extra-hepatic and hepatic cases of portal hypertension.Methods: This prospective study was done in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, Dhaka Shishu (Children) Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh on 40 consecutive cases of esophageal varices enrolled from April, 2014 to March 2016. Every case was treated with band ligation followed by tab. propranolol. Cases were followed up for a minimum period of one year after the band ligation.Results: Age of the children was 2-12 years with mean age of 7.2±4.3 years and male:female ratio was 1.5:1. Out of 40 children, 32 (80%) were pre-hepatic and 8 (20%) hepatic (chronic liver disease with portal hypertension) causes. Only 1 session required in 50% pre-hepatic cases and multiple (2-3) sessions required in hepatic (100%) cases. Almost same number of band (average 2-3) required in every session of both cases. Grade-II esophageal varices with red sign were more common in prehepatic cases & severity of grading much more (grade-III & IV) in hepatic cases. Gastric varices were more common in hepatic (50%) cases than extra-hepatic (12.5%) cases. Recurrence of bleeding occurred in all hepatic (100%) cases and half (50%) of the pre-hepatic cases. Early re-bleeding was more common in hepatic (75%) cases & late re-bleeding in both pre-hepatic (43.7%) & hepatic (100%) cases. Minimal side effect like discomfort (10%) & Nausea (10%) were present after the procedure.Conclusion: Pre-hepatic was the most common etiology of portal hypertension in studied children. Fewer sessions were required in pre-hepatic cases than in hepatic cases. Severity of grading, re-bleeding & associated gastric varices were more common in hepatic cases. Band ligation was found to be the treatment of choice for the control of acute variceal bleeding and prevention of re-bleeding with less complications.Bangladesh J Child Health 2017; VOL 41 (1) :28-33

scholarly journals Role of band ligation for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (26) ◽  
pp. 2902-2914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioanna Aggeletopoulou ◽  
Christos Konstantakis ◽  
Spilios Manolakopoulos ◽  
Christos Triantos
Keyword(s):  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Band Ligation

scholarly journals Evaluation of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents with esophageal varices

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Júlio Rocha PIMENTA ◽  
Alexandre Rodrigues FERREIRA ◽  
Eleonora Druve Tavares FAGUNDES ◽  
Paulo Fernando Souto BITTENCOURT ◽  
Alice Mendes MOURA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Gastric Fundus ◽  
Portal Hypertensive Gastropathy ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Bleeding of esophageal varices is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in children and adults with portal hypertension and there are few studies involving secondary prophylaxis in children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic secondary prophylaxis in prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in children and adolescents with esophageal varices. METHODS This is a prospective analysis of 85 patients less than 18 years of age with or without cirrhosis, with portal hypertension. Participants underwent endoscopic secondary prophylaxis with sclerotherapy or band ligation. Eradication of varices, incidence of rebleeding, number of endoscopic sessions required for eradication, incidence of developing gastric fundus varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy were evaluated. RESULTS Band ligation was performed in 34 (40%) patients and sclerotherapy in 51 (60%) patients. Esophageal varices were eradicated in 81.2%, after a median of four endoscopic sessions. Varices relapsed in 38 (55.1%) patients. Thirty-six (42.3%) patients experienced rebleeding, and it was more prevalent in the group that received sclerotherapy. Gastric varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy developed in 38.7% and 57.9% of patients, respectively. Patients undergoing band ligation showed lower rebleeding rates (26.5% vs 52.9%) and fewer sessions required for eradication of esophageal varices (3.5 vs 5). CONCLUSION Secondary prophylaxis was effective in eradicating esophageal varices and controlling new upper gastrointestinal bleeding episodes due to the rupture of esophageal varices. Band ligation seems that resulted in lower rebleeding rates and fewer sessions required to eradicate varices than did sclerotherapy.

Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding

2020 ◽  
pp. 3068-3080
Author(s):  
Marcus Robertson ◽  
Peter Hayes
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Medical Emergency ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Recurrent Bleeding ◽  
Endoscopic Variceal Ligation ◽  
Complications Of Cirrhosis

Portal hypertension refers to a pathological elevation of pressure in the veins that carry blood from the splanchnic organs to the liver which, in developed countries, most commonly results from increased intrahepatic resistance to portal flow as a result of liver cirrhosis. Portal hypertension is associated with development of many of the complications of cirrhosis and confers a poor prognosis. Acute variceal bleeding is a life-threatening medical emergency which remains a leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. Endoscopic variceal ligation and endoscopic variceal obturation remain the treatments of choice for bleeding oesophageal and gastric varices respectively. Advances in care including prophylactic antibiotics, vasoactive drugs, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in patients with bleeding refractory to early endoscopic management has improved the mortality rate, which is now estimated at 15 to 20%. Secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding with nonselective β‎-blockers and/or endoscopic variceal ligation reduces recurrent bleeding and has been demonstrated to improve survival.

scholarly journals A comparative study of multi-detector CT portography versus endoscopy in evaluation of gastro-esophageal varices in portal hypertension patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hany El-Assaly ◽  
Lamiaa I. A. Metwally ◽  
Heba Azzam ◽  
Mohamed Ibrahim Seif-Elnasr
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Splenic Vein ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gi Endoscopy ◽  
Vein Diameter

Abstract Background Portal hypertension is a major complication resulting from obstruction of portal blood flow, like cirrhosis or portal vein thrombosis, that leads to portal hypertension. MDCT angiography has become an important tool for investigation of the liver as well as potentially challenging varices by detailing the course of these tortuous vessels. This information is decisive for liver transplantation as well as for common procedures in which an unexpected varix can cause significant bleeding. Results This study included an assessment of 60 cases of portal hypertension (28 males and 32 females), their age ranged from 42 to 69 years (mean age = 57.2 ± 6.63). All patients were diagnosed with portal hypertension, underwent upper GI endoscopy followed by a triphasic CT scan with CT angiographic assessment for the screening of gastro-esophageal varices. CT is highly sensitive as compared to upper GI endoscopy (sensitivity 93%) in detecting esophageal varices. Gastric varices detected by CT in 22 patients (37%) compared to 14 patients (23%) detected by endoscopy. While paraesophageal varices were detected in 63% of patients and retro-gastric varices in 80% of patients that were not visualized by endoscopy. Our study reported that the commonest type of collaterals were the splenic collaterals, and we also found there is a significant correlation between the portal vein diameter and the number of collaterals as well as between the portal vein diameter and splenic vein diameter. Conclusions Multi-slice CT serves as an important non-invasive imaging modality in the diagnosis of collaterals in cases of portal hypertension. CT portography can replace endoscopy in the detection of high-risk varices. It also proved that there is a correlation between portal vein diameter, splenic vein diameter, and number of collaterals.

scholarly journals Beyond the scope and the glue: update on evaluation and management of gastric varices

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyriac Abby Philips ◽  
Rizwan Ahamed ◽  
Sasidharan Rajesh ◽  
Tom George ◽  
Meera Mohanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Endovascular Procedures ◽  
Gastric Varices ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Algorithmic Approach ◽  
Evidence Based Treatments ◽  
Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt ◽  
Shed Light

Abstract Gastric varices are encountered less frequently than esophageal varices. Nonetheless, gastric variceal bleeding is more severe and associated with worse outcomes. Conventionally, gastric varices have been described based on the location and extent and endoscopic treatments offered based on these descriptions. With improved understanding of portal hypertension and the dynamic physiology of collateral circulation, gastric variceal classification has been refined to include inflow and outflow based hemodynamic pathways. These have led to an improvement in the management of gastric variceal disease through newer modalities of treatment such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided glue-coiling combination therapy and the emergence of highly effective endovascular treatments such as shunt and variceal complex embolization with or without transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement in patients who are deemed ‘difficult’ to manage the traditional way. Furthermore, the decisions regarding TIPS and additional endovascular procedures in patients with gastric variceal bleeding have changed after the emergence of ‘portal hypertension theories’ of proximity, throughput, and recruitment. The hemodynamic classification, grounded on novel theories and its cognizance, can help in identifying patients at baseline, in whom conventional treatment could fail. In this exhaustive review, we discuss the conventional and hemodynamic diagnosis of gastric varices concerning new classifications; explore and illustrate new ‘portal hypertension theories’ of gastric variceal disease and corresponding management and shed light on current evidence-based treatments through a ‘new’ algorithmic approach, established on hemodynamic physiology of gastric varices.

scholarly journals Rupture of esophageal varices due to portal hypertension

2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 316
Author(s):  
Yusri Dianne Jurnalis ◽  
Yorva Sayoeti ◽  
Marlinda Marlinda
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Variceal Hemorrhage ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
Initial Episode ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal ◽  
Emergent Case

Variceal bleeding is the most common cause of serious upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in children. Most variceal bleeding is esophageal.1 Hemorrhages from esophageal varices due to portal hypertension are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. There is a 30% mortality rate following an initial episode of variceal hematemesis. Mortality increases to 70% with recurrent variceal hemorrhage. Moreover, the one year survival rate after variceal hemorrhage is often poor (32 to 80%).2-4 We report a case of esophageal varices rupture caused by portal hypertension, an emergent case in the Pediatric Gastrohepatology division.

scholarly journals The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound for Esophageal Varices

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1007
Author(s):  
Kazunori Nagashima ◽  
Atsushi Irisawa ◽  
Keiichi Tominaga ◽  
Ken Kashima ◽  
Yasuhito Kunogi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Collateral Circulation ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Esophagogastric Varices ◽  
Indispensable Tool

Esophageal varices are caused by the development of collateral circulation in the esophagus as a result of portal hypertension. It is important to administer appropriate preventive treatment because bleeding varices can be fatal. Esophageal varices have complex and diverse hemodynamics, and there are various variations for each case. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can estimate the hemodynamics of each case. Therefore, observation by EUS in esophageal varices provides useful information, such as safe and effective treatment selection, prediction of recurrence, and appropriate follow-up after treatment. Although treatment for the esophagogastric varices can be performed without EUS imaging, understanding the local hemodynamics of the varices using EUS prior to treatment will lead to more safe and effective treatment. EUS observation is an indispensable tool for thorough variceal care.

scholarly journals Motion – Prophylactic Banding of Esophageal Varices Is Useful: Arguments against the Motion

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 693-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kris V Kowdley
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Varices ◽  
Variceal Bleeding ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Primary Prophylaxis ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Endoscopic Sclerotherapy ◽  
Variceal Hemorrhage ◽  
Band Ligation

Bleeding from esophageal varices leads to substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in pharmacological and endoscopic therapy, as well as general supportive care, the mortality rate associated with acute variceal hemorrhage has not improved significantly over the past two decades. Prophylactic therapy with nonselective beta-blockers or long acting nitrates reduces the incidence of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis, is cost effective and may improve survival. Surgical portosystemic shunting reduces the risk of bleeding but is associated with significant operative mortality and a high risk of portosystemic encephalopathy. Endoscopic sclerotherapy causes adverse effects in a large proportion of patients and is, therefore, not suitable for primary prophylaxis of bleeding. Although variceal band ligation is effective in reducing the rate of bleeding and is safer than sclerotherapy, it has not been shown to provide a survival advantage compared with beta-blockers. A significant reduction in the rate of variceal bleeding with band ligation, compared with beta-blockers, was shown in only one study. Beta-blockers offer several advantages, including low cost, ease of use and safety. The available data do not yet support the prophylactic use of variceal band ligation, and this procedure should be reserved for patients who are either unwilling or unable to take beta-blockers. It is hoped that additional large, multicentre trials of band ligation versus beta-blockers will examine the efficacy, cost effectiveness and impact on quality of life among patients with cirrhosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document