“COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DISTAL END RADIUS FRACTURE TREATED BY PERCUTANEOUS 5 PIN TECHNIQUE V/S CLOSED REDUCTION AND CASTING METHOD”.

2021 ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
Vibhor Khandal ◽  
Ashwani Kumar Mathur ◽  
Mohit Kumar ◽  
Rajkumar Bairwa

Introduction: Distal end radius fractures crush the mechanical foundation of most useful tool, the hand. No other fracture has a such potential to devastate hand function, and no other metaphysis of bone is embraced by more soft tissues. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is one of the standard treatments for management of distal radius fractures, and its modication 'The percutaneous 5 pin technique improves the reliability of xation thus combining the benets of non-invasiveness as in casting and stability achieved is comparable to open reduction and plating. Material and method: This prospective study was done between December 2018 to December 2020 in department of orthopedics, including 60 patients with fracture of distal radius Among them 30 patients subsequently underwent ve pin xation and 30 patients were treated with closed reduction and casting method. Result: Radiological analysis of the data was done using Sarmiento's Modication of Lidstrom Criteria. Activities of daily life (ADL) were examined by using the demerit point system of Gartland and Wereley based on objective and subjective criteria, residual deformity and complications. Radiological parameters were assessed for at the end of 6months. There was signicant difference in all the three parameters i.e, Volar tilt, Radial length, Radial inclination between both groups at the end of 6 months. Closed reduction with ve pinning technique group had shown not only better but also statistically signicant anatomical reduction compared to other groups. Functional outcome was better in patients treated with percutaneous 5 pinning technique. Conclusion: The ve pin technique carries the advantage of early mobilization, DRUJ stability. Radio Ulnar pins and the pins across the fracture site provide enough stability to permit early mobilization leading to less post operative stiffness in joint. Although the study series is small and further research is essential to provide directions for treatment, it is safe to conclude that the ve pin technique is a technically less demanding, lessinvasive and an effective way of treating displaced distal radius fractures without severe articular or metaphyseal comminution

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4535-4538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagay Orbach ◽  
Nimrod Rozen ◽  
Barak Rinat ◽  
Guy Rubin

Objective This study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy and safety of different volumes of lidocaine injected into a fracture hematoma (hematoma block [HB]) for reducing distal radius fractures. Methods Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A included patients in whom 10 mL of 2% lidocaine was injected into the fracture site and group B included patients in whom 20 mL of 1% lidocaine was injected. The fracture was manipulated after 15 minutes and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score was recorded during manipulation. Patients were followed up for approximately 1 hour and complications were recorded. Results Twenty patients were enrolled in the study (12 women and eight men), with a mean age of 57 years (range, 32–87 years). Demographic findings were similar between the groups. The mean VAS score of group A was 5.50 ± 3.57 and that in group B was 3.09 ± 2.33, with no significant difference between the groups. Conclusion VAS scores between HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine and HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine are not significantly different. However, our study suggests that HB with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine has a better analgesic effect than HB with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine.


Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 58S-58S
Author(s):  
Ronit Wollstein ◽  
Lior Koren ◽  
Eyal Ginesin ◽  
Shahem Elias ◽  
Shlomo Israelit

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1287-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narihito Kodama ◽  
Yoshinori Takemura ◽  
Hiroaki Ueba ◽  
Shinji Imai ◽  
Yoshitaka Matsusue

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 6598-6604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingde Kong ◽  
Ningzhao Kou ◽  
Yanxue Wang ◽  
Jian Lu ◽  
Dehu Tian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
Maciej Piotrowski ◽  

Introduction. Distal radius fractures are one of the most common bone injuries. Modern treatment methods are needed not only to reduce the time needed to heal, but also allow the wrist the full range of motion as soon as possible. The solution should provide stable bone fixation with the least possible damage to soft tissues, which will allow quick recovery of extremity function. The method meeting these criteria is intramedullary fixation. Aim of the study. To evaluate the treatment results of distal radius fractures with the DRONes® hybrid nail plate. Material and methods. The study group consists of patients with distal radius fracture treated with open reduction and intramedullary fixation. Patients aged 24 to 69 years (average 54 years) were operated on after a failed attempt to adjust the fracture using the closed reduction method. 40 distal fractures of the distal radius qualified for the following 5 types according to AO: 2 fractures -A2, 5 -A3, 8 -C1, 14 -C2, 11 -C3. Two weeks after the surgery, X-rays were performed to check the position of the bone fragments and implant. After a further 6-7 weeks, the union and wrist function were evaluated. Results. Bone union was achieved in all patients within 8-9 weeks, and the range of wrist mobility was only slightly limited. The most common complication was the neurapraxia of the superficial branch of the radial nerve disappearing after 6-8 weeks. Conclusions. Patients treated with the DRONes® hybrid nail plate achieve good functional results after 8-9 weeks and can return to work and their preinjury lifestyle. An additional advantage is the simple surgical technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document