scholarly journals Painful Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Proposal for an Algorithmic Management Approach

2021 ◽  
pp. 193-201
Author(s):  
Martin Avellanal

Background: The etiological diagnosis of painful primary total hip arthroplasty and its management is a complex clinical challenge for pain physicians. Extrinsic sources of pain in the hip joint might be efficiently treated by clinical pain units, although the topic remains controversial. Objectives: To conduct a literature review and suggest an evidence-based algorithmic approach to managing painful hip arthroplasty. Study Design: Systematic literature review with qualitative data synthesis. Methods: We conducted an online search of Medline/Pubmed, Embase, Clinical Trials, and Cochrane database using the Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and free terms on all biomedical literature published up to August 2019. Articles that described either the etiologies and management of painful primary total hip arthroplasty or the imaging techniques to specifically assess any of its causes were included. We collected the demographic data (gender, age, body mass index), main etiologies, diagnostic tests, and specific treatments applied in each study. Based on the reviewed evidence, we propose an algorithmic approach, with a special emphasis on etiologies that should be referred to pain clinics. Results: Twenty-four studies were included for the synthesis, 16 of which were observational studies and 8 of which were non-systematic literature reviews that described a wide range of etiologies of painful primary total hip arthroplasty. The results showed that 2/3 of the causes of pain were intrinsic and need to be managed by orthopedic surgeons. One third of the etiologies were extrinsic and should be referred to pain clinics once intrinsic causes have been ruled out. Among extrinsic sources of pain, the most frequent was myofascial etiology. Limitations: A publication bias might have been present due to the inclusion of studies published only in English, Spanish, and German. The included studies also had heterogeneous methodologies. Conclusions: The current review suggests that painful hip arthroplasty is not a rare condition in clinical practice. We systematically reviewed etiologies and various treatments published in the literature and we suggest an algorithmic approach to management based on the available evidence. This approach incorporates the evidence regarding our knowledge of the etiologies, diagnosis, and management of chronic pain after total hip arthroplasty. Systematic review registration: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO the international prospective register of systematic reviews, ID CRD42020185663. Key words: Chronic pain, review, pain management, arthroplasty, hip replacement

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 784-794
Author(s):  
G. Neupane ◽  
R. Madhusudhan ◽  
A. Shrestha ◽  
R. Vaishya

Author(s):  
Ioannis Gkiatas ◽  
Theofilos Karasavvidis ◽  
Abhinav K. Sharma ◽  
William Xiang ◽  
Michael-Alexander Malahias ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henning R. Johannson ◽  
Michael G. Zywiel ◽  
David R. Marker ◽  
Lynne C. Jones ◽  
Mike S. McGrath ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. e13520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly L. Corbett ◽  
Elena Losina ◽  
Akosua A. Nti ◽  
Julian J. Z. Prokopetz ◽  
Jeffrey N. Katz

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 515-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh P. Alexander ◽  
Nicholas Frew

Background The 2009 NHS Blood and Transplant national comparative audit on blood use following primary total hip arthroplasty (THR) highlighted that preoperative anaemia was common and undertreated. They recommended that hospitals have a written policy for treating anaemia preoperatively. In our centre, we found that preoperative optimisation of anaemia, significantly reduced blood transfusion rate to <5%. The 2015 national audit showed that even though 48% of patients received tranexamic acid, 85% of patients required transfusion. By conducting a systematic review of literature on blood management for preoperative anaemia in primary THR; we aimed to validate the recommendations of the national audit and increase its awareness in the orthopaedic community. Methods A PubMed Search was performed to identify suitable literature limited to randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, meta-analyses and systematic reviews involving primary THR. We excluded any THRs performed for trauma and revision arthroplasty. Our exclusion criteria for the intervention was the use of autologous methods such as cell salvage techniques and preoperative autologous blood donation. Results Analysis of 13 publications showed widespread study heterogeneity, which precluded meta-analysis. Preoperative blood management (PBM) interventions included the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and oral iron supplementation in 12/13 and 11/13 studies respectively. There were significant differences in transfusion rates between PBM and control groups in 12/13 studies. Conclusions The findings overwhelmingly support preoperative optimisation of anaemia. The main barrier to wider implementation remains the cost effectiveness. We recommend using our validated protocol, which has shown to significantly reduce transfusion rates, length of stay and remain cost effective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document