scholarly journals ANALISIS HUKUM PEMBATALAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH KARENA MENJALANKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Author(s):  
Nurul Fitria ◽  
Muh. Arfah Pattereng ◽  
Zulkifli Makkawaru

Dalam era globalisasi dan modernisasi saat ini, tanah memegang peranan sentral dalam kehidupan manusia serta merupakan permasalahan yang paling pokok dan krusial. Terlihat dari banyaknya perkara perdata maupun pidana yang diajukan ke pengadilan, antara lain menyangkut sengketa tata usaha Negara mengenai penertiban sertipikat tanah dan berbagai perbuatan melawan hukum lainnya. Negara mengakomodir perkembangan ini melalui kewajiban pemerintah untuk menyelenggarakan pendaftaran tanah, baik secara sistematik maupun sporadik dengan tujuan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang hak atas tanah. Penelitian yang dilakukan adalah penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat deskriptif analitis yang menggambarkan mengenai kegiatan pendaftaran tanah beserta berbagai permasalahan seputarnya, khusus mengenai pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Milik berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Nomor : 634PK/PDT/2012 yang kemudian dianalisa guna memberikan saran atau jalan keluar bagi permasalahan yang terjadi. Dari penelitian tersebut diketahui bahwa sertipikat hak atas tanah merupakan alat pembuktian yang kuat, bukan alat pembuktian yang mutlak. Land held a central role in human life and has become the main and crucial problem in this globalization and modernization era. It can be seen from the number of civil and criminal cases that have been filed to the court that concerns to State administrative disputes regarding land certificate publication and other illegal acts. The state accommodates this development through the government's obligation to carry out land registration, both systematically and sporadically, with the main objective of ensuring legal certainty and providing legal protection to land holders. Regarding certificate cancellation on land disputes number: 01006/Panciro on 28 of November 2013 elaborated as well on survey document Number 00541/Panciro 2013 on 15 of November 2013, 5.596 M2 areas. Library research has been done, descriptive analysis, to answer the question above which described about land registration activity with some problems around, concerning land rights certificate cancellation exclusively based on the verdict of the court Number: 634PK/PDT/2012 which analyzed to give suggestion and solution to the problem. The result of the research showed that the land rights certificate is not absolute verification but strong.

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Sriyono Sriyono ◽  
Amin Purnawan

The ATR / BPN Ministry launched a Systematic Complete Land Registration (PTSL) as a National Priority Program. This program is intended for middle to low income groups who can have land rights certificates at a low cost, as well as to provide legal certainty guarantees to holders of land rights. One important thing that must be considered in the implementation of PTSL is the availability of laws and regulations that protect the PTSL process and products. The formulation of the problem in this research is what is the form of legal protection for participants in a complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) in Blora Regency. The method used is sociological juridical. The specifications in this study are descriptive analysis. The data used for this study are primary and secondary data obtained from the field observation, interviews, and literature study methods. Based on the research concluded with the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Spatial Planning / Head of the National Land Agency Number 6 of 2018 On Complete Systematic Land Registration if there are parties who feel their interests are harmed, they can submit an objection to the official who issues the discretionary decision.Keywords: Legal Protection; Land Rights Certificate; Complete Systematic Land Registration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
I Nyoman Suryana

The growing of importance meaning of the land to human life today may causes increase of the potential for conflicts or land disputes, to prevent or at least to reduce the potential for conflict or dispute are required legal and orderly system of land administration. Therefore isrequired to transfer land rights to be registered must be proven by deed of PPAT. As authentic documents PPAT deed must meet procedures for making the deed of PPAT as determined by the laws and other rules. Making the deed that is incompatible with how making PPAT deed may pose a risk to the certainty of land rights arising or recorded on the basis of such deed. Based on this background the authors give the title of this thesis, The Legal Consequences of Making the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land That is Incompatible With PPAT Deed Making Procedures. The aim of this study is to determine the forms, causes and legal consequences of making the deed of sale and purchase of land not in accordance with the procedure making the deed of PPAT. Precriptive specification research in juridical normative law method is used.   The data source that is used are primary and secondary data. The data is collected by analyzing  law expert theories and also library research that are related.The method of juridical approach used is empirical research with prescriptive specifications and data sources used are primary andsecondary data. Collecting data is done by doing library research and field study and then after the data were analyzed conclusion is by using the method of inductive thinking.Based on this research found that, the legal effect of making the deed of sale and purchase of land not in accordance with procedures for making the deed of PPAT is: PPAT can be dishonorably discharged, PPAT deed degraded the strength of proof becomes deed under hand and third parties may utilize it to its interests


Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135
Author(s):  
Anisa Sekarsari ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Akur Nurasa

Abstract: In order to give the assurance of legal certainty, certainty of rights and legal protection to holders and owners of land rights, the land registration shall be carried out. However, there is still a land dispute which now become a homework for The Government. This is because the certificate which should be a strong evidentiary can not guaranteed the legal certainty for the owner, so the person who right the land can blocking the certificate of land rights at Land Office. The issuance of Regulation Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial / Head of National Land Office Number 13 Year of 2017 concerning the Procedures of Block and Sita which expected to create uniformity, standardization in recording process and abolition of registration blocked, it turns out not all the rules can be implemented at The Land Office of Sleman and Bantul Regency.The result of this research shows that blocking certificate process at Sleman Land Office and Bantul Land Office have a policy that the applicant is required to pay the blocking recording fee after the blocking received. Makes a potential loss to the (PNBP) which should be owned by Land Office for faced the problem of KKPweb application which have not been able to accomodate the time period of blocking. Keywords : blocking certificate, blocking, registration blocked Intisari: Dalam rangka memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum dan kepastian hak serta perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang dan pemilik hak atas tanah, maka dilaksanakan pendaftaran tanah. Namun demikian, masih saja terjadi sengketa pertanahan yang saat ini menjadi pekerjaan rumah bagi Pemerintah. Hal ini disebabkan karena, sertipikat sebagai alat pembuktian yang kuat ternyata belum menjamin kepastian hukum pemiliknya sehingga pihak yang merasa berhak atas tanah tersebut dapat melakukan blokir sertipikat hak atas tanah di Kantor Pertanahan. Dikeluarkannya Permen ATR/Kepala Nomor 13 Tahun 2017 tentang Tata Cara Blokir dan Sita yang diharapkan bertujuan untuk mewujudkan keseragaman, standarisasi dalam pelaksanaan pencatatan dan penghapusan catatan blokir ternyata tidak semua peraturan tersebut dapat dilaksanakan di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Bantul. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pelaksanaan pencatatan blokir di kantor pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman dan Kabupaten Bantul terdapat kebijakan yaitu pemohon diwajibkan membayar biaya pencatatan blokir setelah blokirnya diterima membuat potensial loss terhadap (PNBP) yang seharusnya didapat kantor pertanahan untuk kendala yang dihadapi yaitu Aplikasi KKPweb yang belum dapat mengakomodir jangka waktu blokir. Kata Kunci: blokir sertipikat, pemblokiran, pencatatan blokir


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 8-25
Author(s):  
Sabila Rosyida ◽  
A'yun Nadhira

Since the spread of modernization to all corners of the world, human life, especially Muslims, has undergone many changes regarding perspectives and behavior towards various kinds of individual and community groups. All aspects of life in terms of religion, social, economy, education, culture experience drastic changes. One of the effects of modernization has led to large-scale economic changes, especially in people's consumption behavior due to the abundance of objects of service, and the availability of material goods on the market. So that the purpose of consumption in modern society is not only to fulfill the needs of life but also for pleasure and desire and mere satisfaction. Not only that, the consumption behavior of the community, especially the Muslim community, no longer fits the spiritual dimension of their religion, but is influenced by the capitalist concept that bases everything on materialist measures. So that their lives are based on the ideology of hedonism, the main purpose of which is only to obtain material pleasures and pleasures. Thus, Islamization of consumer behavior is needed to free Muslim society from secular doctrine and materialistic nature. And Islam offers the concept of maslaha and the nature of moderation based on Islamic economic ethics on this consumption theory. The method used is qualitative research methods with library research (library research). The data in this study were obtained using the documentary method, to look for data on consumption behavior of modern society, consumption theory, concepts and processes of Islamization, sourced from books, journals, the internet, and papers. Data analysis methods used are inductive, and comparative descriptive analysis.


Law Review ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Jeremy Aidianto Naibaho ◽  
Bambang Daru Nugroho ◽  
Yusuf Saepul Zamil

<p><em><span class="fontstyle0"><strong>Abstract</strong><br /></span></em></p><p><em><span class="fontstyle1">Nationalization of a Dutch-owned plantation company, NV Deli Maatschappij, was an attempt by the government to improve national economic situation. However, during the process, communal land which was concessioned to the plantation, was also nationalized and not given compensation by the government which resulted the indigenous people of Deli Sultanate losing their customary land. The former plantation land was converted to Cultivation Rights and handed over to the State Plantation Company This problem led to a prolonged conflict over ownership of the former estate. The purpose of this study is to determine the validity of the nationalization process carried out by Indonesian government on the existence of indigenous peoples’ customary land rights and obtain  settlement of customary land rights of indigenous peoples as the impact on nationalization. Furthermore, this research is normative legal research (library research) with a statutory approach (statue approach).<br /></span></em></p><p><span class="fontstyle0"><strong><em>Keywords: Nationalization, Communal Land, Compensation</em></strong><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle3"><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle3"><strong>Abstrak</strong><br /></span></p><p><span class="fontstyle4">Proses nasionalisasi Perusahaan Perkebunan milik Belanda, yaitu NV Deli </span><span class="fontstyle1">Maatschappij </span><span class="fontstyle4">adalah upaya pemerintah untuk memperbaiki perekonomian Negara. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya tanah ulayat yang dikonsesikan kepada perkebunan juga ikut ternasionalisasi dan tidak diberikan ganti kerugian oleh pemerintah yang berakibat Masyarakat Adat Kesultanan Deli kehilangan tanah ulayatnya. Tanah bekas perkebunan diubah menjadi Hak Guna Usaha dan diserahkan kepada Perusahaan Perkebunan Negara. Hal ini menimbulkan<br />konflik berkepanjangan tentang kepemilikan tanah bekas perkebunan tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif (</span><em><span class="fontstyle1">library research</span></em><span class="fontstyle4">) dengan pendekatan undang-undang (</span><em><span class="fontstyle1">statue approach</span></em><span class="fontstyle4">). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menilai keabsahan proses nasionalisasi yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah Indonesia terhadap eksistensi hak ulayat Masyarakat Adat dan memperoleh penyelesaian sengketa tanah ulayat Masyarakat Adat sebagai dampak atas<br />nasionalisasi.<br /></span></p><p><strong><span class="fontstyle3">Kata Kunci: Nasionalisasi, Tanah Ulayat, Ganti Rugi</span> </strong></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
Nia Kurniati ◽  
Jordan Mordekhai

As an implementation of welfare society, the government issued Law Number 5 of 1960 Article 19 paragraph (2) c, which provide the legal certainty of land rights for all Indonesians carried out through land registration. The land registration system adopted by Indonesia is negative land cadastre with positive tendency. The implementation of land registration provide the basis of state duty to produce land registration evidence, namely certificate, which is valid as a strong proof of rights. This certificate guarantees the correctness of physical data besides juridical data as long as it is not proven otherwise. Method: This legal research used Normative juridical method, with qualitative juridical data analysis. Results of the study: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency adopted by Indonesia currently does not guarantee legal certainty of land ownership and the community justice itself. This is indicated by the fact that there is still a phenomenon of land disputes, among the result of the issuance of overlapping. By using a legal cadastre-based domain approach, through an approach of extracting historical values of land and integrating the process of dialogue within the issuing of certificate; obtaining legal certainty and the community justice can be achieved. Conclusion: Negative land cadastre with positive tendency is still unable to manifest legal certainty of land ownership and community justice so it is appropriate that an adage states “the highest legal certainty, is the highest injustice”. Strengthening land registration system through the domain approach is an alternative option to manifest legal certainty and community justice.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Donald Andrean

In civil law, land is included in registered objects. Therefore ownership of land rights must be registered, for legal certainty. Land registration is regulated in PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, there are still many lands that have not been registered, to overcome this the government has issued a comprehensive systematic land registration program (PTSL) based on Minister of Agrarian Regulation No. 6 of 2018. The aim of this program is to provide legal certainty and legal protection for land rights owned by the community. The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) provides an opportunity for people who have not registered their land that is located throughout Indonesia in one village or village area. As in the Lima Puluh Kota Regency, there are still many lands that have not been registered, the people obtained them from buying and selling under their hands.The formulation of the problem in this thesis is firstly how is the land registration procedure with the basis of under-selling rights of purchase under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office ?; second, what are the obstacles in the implementation of land registration on the basis of the right to buy and sell under the complete systematic land registration program (PTSL) at the fifty-city district land office? The specification of this research is analytical descriptive, with a normative juridical approach, which is supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are secondary data as primary data and primary data as support, which are collected through literature studies and field studies with interview techniques. The data is then analyzed qualitatively and presented in a qualitative descriptive form. The results of the research and discussion of this thesis can be concluded that the procedure of land registration with the basis of the rights under the hand in the PTSL program in fifty cities is carried out with the stages of planning, location determination, preparation, formation and establishment of the PTSL adjudication committee and task force, counseling, physical data collection and collecting juridical data, researching juridical data for proving rights, announcing physical and juridical data and ratifying it, affirming conversion, recognizing rights and granting rights, accounting for rights, issuing certificates of land rights, documenting and submitting the results of activities and reporting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Daimon Daimon

One of the natural wealth or natural resources created by God Almighty that is needed for human life is land. Humans live on land and obtain food by utilizing land. Human life cannot be separated from the land. The emergence of a legal dispute is originated from the objection of the guideline of a land right both to the status of the land, its priorities and ownership in the hope of obtaining administrative settlement in accordance with applicable regulations. This study uses normative juridical research methods so that the sources used are sourced from literature and legal literature. the conclusion in this study is The modus operandi in the occurrence of land disputes usually involves a systematic network between financiers, land speculators, land certificate brokers, thugs, regional government officials, the police and of course BPN elements. Commonly used modus operandi: Use of falsified land rights; Counterfeiting Warkah; Provision of false information; Letter forgery; Fictitious buying and selling; Fraud or embezzlement; Lease; Suing land ownership; Mastering thug-style land.


Author(s):  
Ratna Biraeng Kumalasari

In this study using normative legal research. Policies related to land are required to guarantee legal certainty and certainty of land ownership rights by every person (individual) or by legal entities. So the community needs to register land in order to obtain a certificate of land rights which serves as a strong means of proof of ownership of land rights by someone. Meanwhile, Article 19 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law states that to ensure legal certainty by the Government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. This is done so that land owners can obtain legal certainty for the land they have owned, and it’s intended that rights holders obtain valid evidence in the form of certificates as a strong means of proof as holders of rights to the land they own. Starting from the description above, the researcher can provide several aspects of the study, including: First, the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) target is so large that it’s not an easy job for the Pasuruan Regency land office, which has 29 State Civil Servants, assisted by 63 non-government employees, due to the limited number of existing staff, the implementation of the Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) land office in Pasuruan Regency involves; 1. The private sector as a third party helping 20,200 fields for measurement and mapping activities, 2. Community participation in assissting Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) in village locations for 10,100 respectively, and 29,700 fields carried out and carried out by the Pasuruan Regency Land Office ASN.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-383
Author(s):  
I Komang Edy Susanto ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Gusti Ketut Sri Astiti

Basically, notaries also serve as Land Deed Making Official (hereafter called PPAT) after they carry out a test. Thus, in carrying out their role as PPAT, they are entitled to make deeds of transferring land rights. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the position of the notary and PPAT in transferring land rights and how legal protection for parties who transfer land through sale and purchase. The research method used in this research was a normative legal method. The results of this study indicated that the position of a notary in the transfer of land rights as an official deed maker is mentioned in article 2 paragraph (1) of Law No. 2/2014 concerning the Position of Notary, which states that a notary is a public official who is authorized to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in this Law or based on other Prevailing Laws. The position of the PPAT in essence has the task of carrying out land registration by making deeds as evidence and having carried out certain legal actions regarding land rights. Legal protection for parties transferring land through sale and purchase is stated in the 1945 Constitution, namely Article 27 paragraph (1) which states that each person has the right to recognition, guarantee, protection, and legal certainty that is just and equal treatment before the law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document