scholarly journals Application of Machine Learning with Impedance Based Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6S4) ◽  
pp. 1139-1148
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Signal Processing ◽  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Soft Computing ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Multiple Cracks ◽  
Civil Infrastructure ◽  
Structural Health ◽  
Soft Computing Techniques

Increased attentiveness on the environmental and effects of aging, deterioration and extreme events on civil infrastructure has created the need for more advanced damage detection tools and structural health monitoring (SHM). Today, these tasks are performed by signal processing, visual inspection techniques along with traditional well known impedance based health monitoring EMI technique. New research areas have been explored that improves damage detection at incipient stage and when the damage is substantial. Addressing these issues at early age prevents catastrophe situation for the safety of human lives. To improve the existing damage detection newly developed techniques in conjugation with EMI innovative new sensors, signal processing and soft computing techniques are discussed in details this paper. The advanced techniques (soft computing, signal processing, visual based, embedded IOT) are employed as a global method in prediction, to identify, locate, optimize, the damage area and deterioration. The amount and severity, multiple cracks on civil infrastructure like concrete and RC structures (beams and bridges) using above techniques along with EMI technique and use of PZT transducer. In addition to survey advanced innovative signal processing, machine learning techniques civil infrastructure connected to IOT that can make infrastructure smart and increases its efficiency that is aimed at socioeconomic, environmental and sustainable development.

Time–frequency and time–scale analyses for structural health monitoring

2006 ◽  
Vol 365 (1851) ◽  
pp. 449-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wiesław J Staszewski ◽  
Amy N Robertson
Keyword(s):  
Signal Processing ◽  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Structural Health ◽  
Variant Analysis

Signal processing is one of the most important elements of structural health monitoring. This paper documents applications of time-variant analysis for damage detection. Two main approaches, the time–frequency and the time–scale analyses are discussed. The discussion is illustrated by application examples relevant to damage detection.

scholarly journals Structural Health Monitoring and Damage Detection through Machine Learning approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 01096
Author(s):  
Priyanka Singh ◽  
Umaid Faraz Ahmad ◽  
Siddharth Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Primary Component ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Research Attention ◽  
Structural Health

Data-driven approaches are gaining popularity in structural health monitoring (SHM) due to recent technological advances in sensors, high-speed Internet and cloud computing. Since Machine learning (ML), particularly in SHM, was introduced in civil engineering, this modern and promising method has drawn significant research attention. SHM’s main goal is to develop different data processing methodologies and generate results related to the different levels of damage recognition process. SHM implements a technique for damage detection and classification, including data from a system collected under different structural states using a piezoelectric sensor network using guided waves, hierarchical non-linear primary component analysis and machine learning. The primary objective of this paper is to analyse the current SHM literature using evolving ML-based methods and to provide readers with an overview of various SHM applications. The technique and implementation of vibration-based, vision-based surveillance, along with some recent SHM developments are discussed.

Structural Health Monitoring

2011 ◽  
pp. 230-243
Author(s):  
Liang Wang ◽  
Tommy Chan ◽  
David Thambiratnam ◽  
Andy Tan
Keyword(s):  
Signal Processing ◽  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Statistical Methods ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Transportation Network ◽  
Structural Health ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Bridge Structures ◽  
Wavelet Techniques

<P>Structural health is a vital aspect of infrastructure sustainability. As a part of a vital infrastructure and transportation network, bridge structures must function safely at all times. However, due to heavier and faster moving vehicular loads and function adjustment, such as Busway accommodation, many bridges are now operating at an overload beyond their design capacity. Additionally, the huge renovation and replacement costs are a difficult burden for infrastructure owners. The structural health monitoring (SHM) systems proposed recently are incorporated with vibration-based damage detection techniques, statistical methods and signal processing techniques and have been regarded as efficient and economical ways to assess bridge condition and foresee probable costly failures. In this chapter, the recent developments in damage detection and condition assessment techniques based on vibration-based damage detection and statistical methods are reviewed. The vibration-based damage detection methods based on changes in natural frequencies, curvature or strain modes, modal strain energy, dynamic flexibility, artificial neural networks, before and after damage, and other signal processing methods such as Wavelet techniques, empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum methods are discussed in this chapter.&nbsp;&nbsp; </P>

scholarly journals Structural Health Monitoring Using Machine Learning and Cumulative Absolute Velocity Features

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5727
Author(s):  
Sifat Muin ◽  
Khalid M. Mosalam
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Degree Of Freedom ◽  
Absolute Velocity ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Damage State ◽  
Structural Health ◽  
Cumulative Absolute Velocity

Machine learning (ML)-aided structural health monitoring (SHM) can rapidly evaluate the safety and integrity of the aging infrastructure following an earthquake. The conventional damage features used in ML-based SHM methodologies face the curse of dimensionality. This paper introduces low dimensional, namely, cumulative absolute velocity (CAV)-based features, to enable the use of ML for rapid damage assessment. A computer experiment is performed to identify the appropriate features and the ML algorithm using data from a simulated single-degree-of-freedom system. A comparative analysis of five ML models (logistic regression (LR), ordinal logistic regression (OLR), artificial neural networks with 10 and 100 neurons (ANN10 and ANN100), and support vector machines (SVM)) is performed. Two test sets were used where Set-1 originated from the same distribution as the training set and Set-2 came from a different distribution. The results showed that the combination of the CAV and the relative CAV with respect to the linear response, i.e., RCAV, performed the best among the different feature combinations. Among the ML models, OLR showed good generalization capabilities when compared to SVM and ANN models. Subsequently, OLR is successfully applied to assess the damage of two numerical multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) models and an instrumented building with CAV and RCAV as features. For the MDOF models, the damage state was identified with accuracy ranging from 84% to 97% and the damage location was identified with accuracy ranging from 93% to 97.5%. The features and the OLR models successfully captured the damage information for the instrumented structure as well. The proposed methodology is capable of ensuring rapid decision-making and improving community resiliency.

scholarly journals Magnetostrictive Sensors for Composite Damage Detection and Wireless Structural Health Monitoring

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Zhaoyuan Leong ◽  
William Holmes ◽  
James Clarke ◽  
Akshay Padki ◽  
Simon Hayes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Structural Health Monitoring ◽  
Damage Detection ◽  
Health Monitoring ◽  
Structural Health ◽  
Composite Damage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document