scholarly journals Cloning of Phosphate Starvation Response 1gene (AtPHR1) in Garden Plants: Focus on Phytoremediation of Inorganic Phosphate

2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anubhuti Gupta ◽  
Vibha Rani
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1782-1793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yoon-Suk Kang ◽  
Abdullah Alowaifeer ◽  
Kaixiang Shi ◽  
Xia Fan ◽  
...  

PROTEOMICS ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1495-1511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wanda Maria Almeida von Krüger ◽  
Leticia Miranda Santos Lery ◽  
Marcia Regina Soares ◽  
Fernanda Saloum de Neves-Manta ◽  
Celia Maria Batista e Silva ◽  
...  

PROTEOMICS ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 3582-3601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Thi Hoi ◽  
Birgit Voigt ◽  
Britta Jürgen ◽  
Armin Ehrenreich ◽  
Gerhard Gottschalk ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Matsui ◽  
Junichi Togami ◽  
John G. Mason ◽  
Stephen F. Chandler ◽  
Yoshikazu Tanaka

Although phosphorus is an essential factor for proper plant growth in natural environments, an excess of phosphate in water sources causes serious pollution. In this paper we describe transgenic plants which hyperaccumulate inorganic phosphate (Pi) and which may be used to reduce environmental water pollution by phytoremediation. AtPHR1, a transcription factor for a key regulator of the Pi starvation response inArabidopsis thaliana, was overexpressed in the ornamental garden plantsTorenia, Petunia, and Verbena.The transgenic plants showed hyperaccumulation of Pi in leaves and accelerated Pi absorption rates from hydroponic solutions. Large-scale hydroponic experiments indicated that the enhanced ability to absorb Pi in transgenic torenia (AtPHR1) was comparable to water hyacinth a plant that though is used for phytoremediation causes overgrowth problems.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omri M. Finkel ◽  
Isai Salas-González ◽  
Gabriel Castrillo ◽  
Stijn Spaepen ◽  
Theresa F. Law ◽  
...  

AbstractPhosphate starvation response (PSR) in non-mycorrhizal plants comprises transcriptional reprogramming resulting in severe physiological changes to the roots and shoots and repression of plant immunity. Thus, plant-colonizing microorganisms – the plant microbiota – are exposed to direct influence by the soil’s phosphorous (P) content itself, as well as to the indirect effects of soil P on the microbial niches shaped by the plant. The individual contribution of these factors to plant microbiota assembly remains unknown. To disentangle these direct and indirect effects, we planted PSR-deficient Arabidopsis mutants in a long-term managed soil P gradient, and compared the composition of their shoot and root microbiota to wild type plants across different P concentrations. PSR-deficiency had a larger effect on the composition of both bacterial and fungal plant-associated microbiota composition than P concentrations in both roots and shoots. The fungal microbiota was more sensitive to P concentrationsper sethan bacteria, and less depended on the soil community composition.Using a 185-member bacterial synthetic community (SynCom) across a wide P concentration gradient in an agar matrix, we demonstrated a shift in the effect of bacteria on the plant from a neutral or positive interaction to a negative one, as measured by rosette size. This phenotypic shift is accompanied by changes in microbiota composition: the genusBurkholderiais specifically enriched in plant tissue under P starvation. Through a community drop-out experiment, we demonstrate that in the absence ofBurkholderiafrom the SynCom, plant shoots accumulate higher phosphate levels than shoots colonized with the full SynCom, only under P starvation, but not under P-replete conditions. Therefore, P-stressed plants allow colonization by latent opportunistic competitors found within their microbiome, thus exacerbating the plant’s P starvation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document