CFD boundary conditions, turbulence models and dispersion study for flows around obstacles

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Parente ◽  
R. Longo ◽  
M. Ferrarotti
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Turbulence Models

Evaluation of Different Turbulence Models Applied in Turbopump’s Hydraulic Turbine

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Ferreira Corrêa Barbosa ◽  
Daniel da Silva Tonon ◽  
Luiz Henrique Lindquist Whitacker ◽  
Jesuino Takachi Tomita ◽  
Cleverson Bringhenti
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Rotor Blade ◽  
Space Shuttle ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Tip Clearance ◽  
Test Facility ◽  
Speed Ratio ◽  
Computational Domain ◽  
Axial Turbine

Abstract The aim of this work is an evaluation of different turbulence models applied in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) techniques in the turbomachinery area, in this case, in an axial turbine stage used in turbopump (TP) application. The tip clearance region was considered in this study because it has a high influence in turbomachinery performance. In this region, due to its geometry and the relative movement between the rotor row and casing, there are losses associated with vortices and secondary flow making the flowfield even more turbulent and complex. Moreover, the flow that leaks in the tip region does not participate in the energy transfer between the fluid and rotor blades, degradating the machine efficiency and performance. In this work, the usual flat tip rotor blade geometry was considered. The modeling of turbulent flow based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations predicts the variation of turbine operational characteristics that is sufficient for the present turbomachine and flow analysis. Therefore, the appropriate choice of the turbulence model for the study of a given flow is essential to obtain adequate results using numerical approximations. This comparison become important due to the fact that there is no general turbulence model for all engineering applications that has fluid and flow. The turbomachine considered in the present work, is the first stage of the hydraulic axial turbine used in the Low Pressure Oxidizer Turbopump (LPOTP) of the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME), considering the 3.0% tip clearance configuration relative to rotor blade height. The turbulence models evaluated in this work were the SST (Shear Stress Transport), the k-ε Standard and the k-ε RNG. The computational domain was discretized in several control volumes based on unstructured mesh. All the simulations were performed using the commercial software developed by ANSYS, CFX v15.0 (ANSYS). All numerical settings and how the boundary conditions were imposed at different surfaces are explained in the work. The boundary conditions settings follow the same rule used in the test facility and needs some attention during the simulations to vary the Blade-Jet-Speed ratio parameter adequately. The results from numerical simulations, were synthesized and compared with the experimental data published by National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), in which the turbine efficiency and its jet velocity parameter are analyzed for each turbulence model result. The work fluid considered in this work was water, the same fluid used in the NASA test facility.

scholarly journals Study on Hydraulic Performances of a 3-Bladed Inducer Based on Different Numerical and Experimental Methods

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanxia Fu ◽  
Yujiang Fang ◽  
Jiangping Yuan ◽  
Shouqi Yuan ◽  
Giovanni Pace ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Flow Model ◽  
Static Pressure ◽  
Pressure Rise ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Experimental Methods ◽  
Hydraulic Performance ◽  
Outlet Pressure ◽  
Ansys Cfx ◽  
Flow Through

The hydraulic performances of a 3-bladed inducer, designed at Alta, Pisa, Italy, are investigated both experimentally and numerically. The 3D numerical model developed in ANSYS CFX to simulate the flow through the inducer and different lengths of its inlet/outlet ducts is illustrated. The influence of the inlet/outlet boundary conditions, of the turbulence models, and of the location of inlet/outlet different pressure taps on the evaluation of the hydraulic performance of the inducer is analyzed. As expected, the predicted hydraulic performance of the inducer is significantly affected by the lengths of the inlet/outlet duct portions included in the computations, as well as by the turbulent flow model and the locations of the inlet/outlet pressure taps. It is slightly affected by the computational boundary conditions and better agreement with the test data obtained when adopting the k-ω turbulence model. From the point of the pressure tap locations, the pressure rise coefficient is much higher when the inlet/outlet static pressure taps were chosen in the same locations used in the experiments.

Investigation of Annular Jet Flows in a Subsonic Air-Air Ejector With Multi-Ring Entraining Diffuser

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Namet-Allah ◽  
A. M. Birk
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Nozzle Exit ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Domain Size ◽  
Pressure Recovery ◽  
Cfd Simulations ◽  
The Core ◽  
Measured Flow ◽  
Air Ejector

The current paper presents a cold flow simulation study of a low Mach number air-air ejector with a four ring entraining diffuser that is used in a variety of applications including infrared (IR) suppression of exhaust from helicopters and fixed wing aircraft. The main objectives of this investigation were to identify key issues that must be addressed in successful CFD modelling of such devices, and recognize opportunities to improve the performance of these devices. Two-dimensional CFD simulations were carried out using commercial software, Ansys14. Studies of mesh and domain size sensitivity were made to ensure the CFD results were independent of both factors. A turbulence model independence study using k-ε, k-ω and RSM turbulence models was performed to figure out the appropriate turbulence model that produced the best agreement with the experimental data for several of ejector performance criteria. The measured flow properties in the annulus were used as input boundary conditions for the CFD simulations. However, in the comprehensive turbulence model study, the measured flow parameters at the nozzle exit were also applied as inlet boundary conditions for the CFD simulations. The measured flow velocity at the nozzle exit, at one centerline section inside the mixing tube and at the diffuser exit and the system pressure recovery were compared with the CFD predictions. The ejector pumping ratios, back pressure coefficient and diffuser gap velocities were also compared. It was found that the RANS-based CFD predictions were sensitive to the changes in the ejector domain size, mesh refinement and inlet boundary condition locations. With the annulus inlet boundary conditions, the tested turbulence models under predicted the size of the core separation downstream of the system, back pressure, pumping ratio and pressure recovery in the mixing tube and diffuser. However, the ability of the RNG turbulence model to predict the ejector performance parameters was better than that of the other turbulence models at all inlet flow conditions. Nevertheless, applying the inlet boundary conditions at the nozzle exit enhanced the capability of the RANS-based turbulence model particularly in predicting the ejector pumping ratios, pressure recovery and the size of the core separation. Finally, the acceptable agreement between the experimental data and the CFD predictions provides a valid tool to continue improving these devices using CFD techniques.

Numerical Simulation of Flow Around a Simplified Car Body

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Guilmineau
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Test Case ◽  
Slant Angle ◽  
Acceptable Limit ◽  
Numerical Errors ◽  
Car Body ◽  
Ahmed Body

Simulations have been carried out for the generic car body (Ahmed body) for 25° and 35° slant angle. At a previous Workshop [1, 2], the results of different groups showed significant variations, even when the same turbulence models were used. This indicates that either the grids used in the investigation are too coarse to reduce the numerical errors below an acceptable limit, or that other factors, like boundary conditions, model implementation had a significant effect on the simulations. In any case, the results of the simulations were inconclusive, leading to a revaluation of this test case. In this study, we investigate numerically the flow around the Ahmed body for 25° and 35° slant angle. Results are compared with experimental data of Becker et al. [3].

scholarly journals The influence of boundary condition functions on the quality of the solution and its sensitivity to coefficients of k-ε turbulence models

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 015-026
Author(s):  
Ewa Błazik-Borowa
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Input Data ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Turbulence Kinetic Energy ◽  
Flow Parameters ◽  
Measurement Results ◽  
Calculation Results

The paper is devoted to the problem of boundary conditions influence on the quality of the solution obtained with use of k-ε turbulence models. There are calculation results for different boundary conditions and two methods: standard k-ε and RNG k-ε in the paper. The flow parameters obtained from the calculation are compared with our own measurement results. Moreover, the influence of input data on the inflow edge on sensitivity coefficients is shown and analysed in the paper. The research is performed for components of velocity and turbulence kinetic energy.

On the Numerical Behavior of RANS-Based Transition Models

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Lopes ◽  
Luís Eça ◽  
Guilherme Vaz
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Numerical Solutions ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Discretization Error ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Laminar Separation ◽  
Aft Model ◽  
Transition Models ◽  
Distinct Features ◽  
Naca 0012

Abstract A comparison of several Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) based transition models is presented. Four of the most widespread models are selected: the γ−Reθ, γ, amplification factor transport (AFT), and kT−kL−ω models, representative of different modeling approaches. The calculations are performed on several geometries: a flat plate, the Eppler 387 and NACA 0012 two-dimensional (2D) airfoils at two angles of attack, and the SD7003 wing. Distinct features such as the influence of the inlet boundary conditions, discretization error, and modeling error are discussed. It is found that all models present a strong sensitivity to the turbulence quantities inlet boundary conditions, and with the exception of the AFT model, are severely influenced by the decay of turbulence predicted by the underlying turbulence model. This makes the estimation of modeling errors troublesome because these quantities are rarely reported in experiments. Despite not having specific terms in their formulation to deal with separation-induced transition, both the AFT and kT−kL−ω models manage to predict it for the Eppler 387 foil, although presenting higher numerical uncertainty than the remaining models. However, both models show difficulties in the simulation of flows at Reynolds numbers under 105. The γ−Reθ and γ models are the most robust alternatives in terms of iterative and discretization error. The use of RANS compatible transition models allows for laminar flow and features such as laminar separation bubbles to be reproduced and can lead to greatly improved numerical solutions when compared to simulations performed with standard turbulence models.

Evaluation of RANS Models in Predicting Low Reynolds, Free, Turbulent Round Jet

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahriar Ghahremanian ◽  
Bahram Moshfegh
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Flow Behavior ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Diffusion Term ◽  
Turbulent Region ◽  
Round Jet ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Low Reynolds

In order to study the flow behavior of multiple jets, numerical prediction of the three-dimensional domain of round jets from the nozzle edge up to the turbulent region is essential. The previous numerical studies on the round jet are limited to either two-dimensional investigation with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) models or three-dimensional prediction with higher turbulence models such as large eddy simulation (LES) or direct numerical simulation (DNS). The present study tries to evaluate different RANS turbulence models in the three-dimensional simulation of the whole domain of an isothermal, low Re (Re = 2125, 3461, and 4555), free, turbulent round jet. For this evaluation the simulation results from two two-equation (low Re k-ɛ and low Re shear stress transport (SST) k-ω), a transition three-equation (k-kl-ω), and a transition four-equation (SST) eddy-viscosity turbulence models are compared with hot-wire anemometry measurements. Due to the importance of providing correct inlet boundary conditions, the inlet velocity profile, the turbulent kinetic energy (k), and its specific dissipation rate (ω) at the nozzle exit have been employed from an earlier verified numerical simulation. Two-equation RANS models with low Reynolds correction can predict the whole domain (initial, transition, and fully developed regions) of the round jet with prescribed inlet boundary conditions. The transition models could only reach to a good agreement with the measured mean axial velocities and its rms in the initial region. It worth mentioning that the round jet anomaly is still present in the turbulent region of the round jet predicted by the low Re k-ɛ. By comparing the k and the ω predicted by different turbulence models, the blending functions in the cross-diffusion term is found one of the reasons behind the more consistent prediction by the low Re SST k-ω.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document