scholarly journals The Social Construction of Risk Perception: A Comparison between Risk Perceptions of Nuclear Power Plants after the Chernobyl and the Fukushima Nuclear Accident

2013 ◽  
Vol null (15) ◽  
pp. 117-143
Author(s):  
박진희
Author(s):  
Zheng Hua ◽  
Wei Shuhong

In 2016, IAEA revised and issued SSR-2/1 Safety of Nuclear Power Plants: Design and issued SSR-2/1 (Rev.1). Major revision in SSR-2/1 (Rev.1) is analyzed (especially new requirements after Fukushima nuclear accident). Problems in SSR-2/1 (Rev.1) are also discussed, which could be used as a reference in HAF102 revision and SSR-2/1 (Rev.1) application.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-52
Author(s):  
Upik Sarjiati

Japans success in the development of nuclear energy cannot be separated from the role of the nuclear village, a pro-nuclear group comprising experts, bureaucrats, politicians and the mass media. The nuclear village created an image of nuclear energy as safe, cheap and reliable. Using this nuclear village was one of the strategies used to construct a perception of the risk of nuclear energy. Thus, the acceptance by Japanese people of nuclear energy is an important factor in their support for economic development. However, the Fukushima nuclear accident changed the publics perception of nuclear energy and the Japanese Government was asked to end the operation of nuclear power plants. The government decided to change energy policy by phasing out nuclear power by the end of year 2030. Conversely, the Fukushima nuclear accident has not impeded the Indonesian Governments plans to build nuclear power plants. Thus, understanding how the Japanese Government managed nuclear risk is expected to raise Indonesian public awareness of such risks.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiji Nagatani ◽  
Seiga Kiribayashi ◽  
Yoshito Okada ◽  
Kazuki Otake ◽  
Kazuya Yoshida ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Xinyu Wei ◽  
Hongbin Ma ◽  
Xiaowei Xiong ◽  
Duanjie Yang ◽  
Zhaorong Shang

In China, the radioactive environmental impact assessment (EIA) for nuclear power plants (NPPs) had been carried out in detail due to the specific characteristic of radiation and the social universal attention. However, the nonradioactive environment impact assessment for NPP doesn’t get enough attention. This should be improved, since the operation of NPPs could cause some serious nonradioactive environment impacts. Based on the investigation of EIA for American NPPs, the following suggestions were put forward for Chinese EIA: (1) the laws and regulations in China need to be revised for the EIA of NPPs; (2) the statistics of chemicals or biocides used in the operation of NPPs and their discharged concentration need to be tested; (3) the impact assessments of nonradioactive gas emissions as well as hazardous wastes need to be carried out to meet the national requirements; and (4) the monitoring of nonradioactive waste also needs to be carried out for NPPs to obtain the basic data.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 631-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Chi Fong Ieong ◽  
Jung-Chun Ho ◽  
Patricia Chiao-Tze Lee ◽  
Tomiko Hokama ◽  
Tsugiko Gima ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document