scholarly journals Effect of Light Intensity and Curing Time on Color Stability of a Methacrylate-Based Composite Resin Using an LED Light-Curing Unit

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Hosna Teimourian ◽  
Negin Farahmandpour ◽  
Maryam Zali Moghadam ◽  
Hoda Pouyanfar ◽  
Narges Panahandeh
2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 585-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Oh Kim ◽  
Soo-Byung Park ◽  
Woo-Sung Son ◽  
Ching-Chang Ko ◽  
Franklin García-Godoy ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Roberto Lovadino ◽  
Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano ◽  
Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar ◽  
Aline Braceiro ◽  
Débora Alves Nunes Leite Lima

Abstract Aims The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of light curing modes and curing time on the microhardness of a hybrid composite resin. Methods and Materials Forty-five Z250 composite resin specimens (3M-ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, MN, USA) were randomly divided into nine groups (n=5): three polymerization modes (conventional - 550 mW/ cm2; light-emitting diodes (LED) - 360mW/cm2, and high intensity - 1160 mW/cm2) and three light curing times (once, twice, and three times the manufacturer's recommendations). All samples were polymerized with the light tip 8 mm from the specimen. Knoop microhardness measurements were obtained on the top and bottom surfaces of the sample. Results Conventional and LED polymerization modes resulted in higher hardness means and were statistically different from the high intensity mode in almost all experimental conditions. Tripling manufacturers’ recommended light curing times resulted in higher hardness means; this was statistically different from the other times for all polymerization modes in the bottom surface of specimens. This was also true of the top surface of specimens cured using the high intensity mode but not of conventional and LED modes using any of the chosen curing times. Top surfaces showed higher hardness than bottom surfaces. Conclusions It is important to increase the light curing time and use appropriate light curing devices to polymerize resin composite in deep cavities to maximize the hardness of hybrid composite resins. Citation Aguiar FHB, Braceiro A, Lima DANL, Ambrosano GMB, Lovadino JR. Effect of Light Curing Modes and Light Curing Time on the Microhardness of a Hybrid Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 September; (8)6:001-008.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Augusto César Discacciati ◽  
Alisson Discacciati Neves ◽  
Rodrigo Lambert Oréfice ◽  
Flávio Juliano Garcia Santos Pimenta ◽  
Herbert Haueisen Sander

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrício Aulo Ogliari ◽  
Ulisses Bastos Campregher ◽  
Susana Maria Werner Samuel ◽  
Carmen Beatriz Borges Fortes ◽  
Alberth David Correa Medina ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of three commercially available light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCU) (Elipar FreeLight - 3M ESPE; UltraLume LED2 - Ultradent; and Single V - BioArt) for polymerizing Z250-A3 composite (3M ESPE) using Knoop hardness, polymerization depth, and flexural strength properties. Methods and Materials The XL 2500 (3M ESPE) LCU, which is a conventional halogen unit, was used as a control. In all cases the curing time was 20 seconds. Hardness was determined 24 hours after composite cure for 10 samples of 8 mm diameter and 2 mm height for each LCU tested. Samples were stored dry in a lightproof container prior to testing. The depth of cure of the composite was measured immediately after composite polymerization for each LCU using three samples 4 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height. Flexural strength was determined for five samples 24 hours after immersion in distilled water at 37°C. Each sample measured 25 mm in length, 2 mm in width, and 2 mm in height for each LCU tested. Conclusion The results were treated statistically for comparison of the LCUs. In all cases the results obtained by LED LCUs were not different or were higher than a conventional halogen LCU. Clinical Significance Second generation LED LCUs were as effective as/or more effective than a halogen LCU for polymerization of the used composite. The present study shows second generation LEDs have the potential to replace halogen LCUs. Citation Campregher UB, Samuel SMW, Fortes CBB, Medina ADC, Collares FMC, Ogliari FA. Effectiveness of Second-generation Light-emitting Diode (LED) Light Curing Units. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 February;(8)2:035-042.


2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 12-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Elhejazi

Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage of resin composites. The five materials tested were Lite-Fil (A) (LFA), Lite-Fil (P) (LFP), Z100, Palfique, (PAL) and Tetric (TRC). Two types of measurements were made to determine the effects of environmental temperature and light intensity. Results were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Newman-Keuls procedure at (P<0.05). The changes in temperature and/or light intensity strongly affected composite shrinkage. The amount of shrinkage for LFP at 100% light intensity in room temperature (23°C) was 1.26% and increased up to 2.29% at 60°C. By raising the temperature to 37°C and dropping the light intensity to 42% (459mW/cm2), the amount of polymerization shrinkage was similar to that with full light intensity, and statistically there were no significant differences between 37°C, 45°C, and 60°C. Lower temperatures and lower light intensities produce lower values of shrinkage. However, if the light intensity is below 28%, higher temperatures (60°C) must be applied to obtain a comparable amount of shrinkage. Clinical Relevance Pre-heating composite resin materials at body temperature (37°C) is likely to improve physical properties and compensate any drop of light intensity. Citation Elhejazi AA. The Effects of Temperature and Light Intensity on the Polymerization Shrinkage of Light-cured Composite Filling Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006 July;(7)3:012-021.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-160
Author(s):  
Bandish Parekh ◽  
Sucheta Sathe

ABSTRACT Dental chair lights have been known to rapidly polymerize lightcured composites beyond the point of workability. Often in our dental clinics we are advised to switch off the dental chair light while light curing of dental composites. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the dental chair light causes any effect on the degree of polymerization of light cured composites using the quartz tungsten halogen (QTH) and the light emitting diode (LED) light curing units (LCUs). Filtek Z350 composite samples of 2 × 5 mm were prepared in an acrylic mold. Four groups were made having 20 samples each. In group I and II light curing was done using QTH LCU with and without the dental chair light respectively. Similarly in group III and IV LED LCU was used. Microhardness was measured and compared using Knoop's hardness Test. Data was submitted to ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results showed that the average microhardness was significantly higher in group 4 (LED light curing with dental chair light on). Thus, it was concluded that the dental chair light can be left on while using QTH and LED LCU's during light curing of composite material. How to cite this article Parekh B, Sathe S, Hegde V. Analysis of the Effect of Dental Chair Light on the Knoop Hardness of Composite Resin While Light Curing with QTH and LED Light Units. World J Dent 2012;3(2):156-160.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 615-620
Author(s):  
Trimurni Abidin ◽  
Dennis Dennis ◽  
Juliana S Siagian ◽  
Tulus Ikhsan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document