Detection of metastases in breast cancer patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (03) ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mahner ◽  
S. Schirrmacher ◽  
L. Jenicke ◽  
V. Müller ◽  
C. R. Habermann ◽  
...  

SummaryDistant metastases at primary diagnosis are a prognostic key factor in breast cancer patients and play a central role in therapeutic decisions. To detect them, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound, and bone scintigraphy are performed as standard of care in Germany and many centers worldwide. Although FDG PET detects metastatic disease with high accuracy, its diagnostic value in breast cancer still needs to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of FDG PET with conventional imaging. Patients, methods: A retrospective analysis of 119 breast cancer patients who presented for staging was performed. Whole-body FDG-PET (n=119) was compared with chest X-ray (n=106) and bone scintigraphy (n=95). Each imaging modality was independently assessed and classified for metastasis (negative, equivocal and positive. The results of abdominal ultrasound (n=100) were classified as negative and positive according to written reports. Imaging results were compared with clinical follow-up including follow-up imaging procedures and histopathology. Results: FDG-PET detected distant metastases with a sensitivity of 87.3% and a specificity of 83.3%. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of combined conventional imaging procedures was 43.1% and 98.5%, respectively. Regarding so-called equivocal and positive results as positive, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET was 93.1% and 76.6%, respectively, compared to 61.2% and 86.6% for conventional imaging. Regarding different locations of metastases the sensitivity of FDG PET was superior in the detection of pulmonary metastases and lymph node metastases of the mediastinum in comparison to chest x-ray, whereas the sensitivity of FDG PET in the detection of bone and liver metastases was comparable with bone scintigraphy and ultrasound of the abdomen. Conclusions: FDG-PET is more sensitive than conventional imaging procedures for detection of distant breast cancer metastases and should be considered for additional staging especially in patients with high risk primary breast cancer.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1054-1054
Author(s):  
S. Mahner ◽  
S. Schirrmacher ◽  
V. Müller ◽  
C. Habermann ◽  
W. Brenner ◽  
...  

1054 Background: The presence of distant metastases is a key prognostic factor in breast cancer patients and plays a central role in therapeutic decisions. To detect distant metastases, chest X-ray, abdominal ultrasound and bone scintigraphy are performed as standard of care in many centers. In various tumors, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) detects metastatic disease with high accuracy, but the diagnostic value in breast cancer still needs to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET with conventional imaging. Methods: In 119 breast cancer patients who presented for restaging, whole-body FDG-PET was compared with chest X-ray, bone scintigraphy and abdominal ultrasound. Each imaging modality was independently assessed and classified as ‘negative’, ‘equivocal’ and ‘positive’ for metastasis. The imaging results were compared with histopathology and clinical follow-up including follow-up imaging procedures which together served as the reference standard. Results: For findings classified as ‘positive’, FDG-PET detected distant metastases with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 83%. In contrast, the sensitivity and specificity of combined conventional imaging procedures was 43% and 98%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 89% and 82% for FDG-PET and 96% and 69% for conventional imaging. Combining ‘equivocal’ and ‘positive’ results, the sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET was 93% and 76%, respectively, compared to 61% and 86% for conventional imaging. The positive and negative predictive values were 86% and 88% for FDG-PET versus 77% and 75% for conventional imaging. Conclusions: FDG-PET is superior to conventional imaging procedures for detection of distant breast cancer metastases. However, the use of computed tomography (CT), particularly in combined PET/CT, needs to be addressed in future studies comparing anatomical vs. metabolic staging procedures in breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Jin Choi ◽  
Young Duck Shin ◽  
Yoon Hee Kang ◽  
Moon Soo Lee ◽  
Min Koo Lee ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (50) ◽  
pp. e8985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soyeon Park ◽  
Joon-Kee Yoon ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Seok Yun Kang ◽  
Hyunee Yim ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Ciatto ◽  
P Pacini ◽  
C Andreoli ◽  
S Cecchini ◽  
A Iossa ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1220
Author(s):  
Sarit Badiani ◽  
S. Addison ◽  
R. Hobson ◽  
A. Jewkes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document