Faculty Opinions recommendation of Multidimensional receptive field processing by cat primary auditory cortical neurons.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew King
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons

Two-dimensional receptive-field organization in striate cortical neurons of the cat

1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 703-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Sun ◽  
A. B. Bonds
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Ocular Dominance ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Cortical Layers ◽  
Field Organization ◽  
Receptive Field Organization ◽  
Cortical Receptive Fields

AbstractThe two-dimensional organization of receptive fields (RFs) of 44 cells in the cat visual cortex and four cells from the cat LGN was measured by stimulation with either dots or bars of light. The light bars were presented in different positions and orientations centered on the RFs. The RFs found were arbitrarily divided into four general types: Punctate, resembling DOG filters (11%); those resembling Gabor filters (9%); elongate (36%); and multipeaked-type (44%). Elongate RFs, usually found in simple cells, could show more than one excitatory band or bifurcation of excitatory regions. Although regions inhibitory to a given stimulus transition (e.g. ON) often coincided with regions excitatory to the opposite transition (e.g. OFF), this was by no means the rule. Measurements were highly repeatable and stable over periods of at least 1 h. A comparison between measurements made with dots and with bars showed reasonable matches in about 40% of the cases. In general, bar-based measurements revealed larger RFs with more structure, especially with respect to inhibitory regions. Inactivation of lower cortical layers (V-VI) by local GABA injection was found to reduce sharpness of detail and to increase both receptive-field size and noise in upper layer cells, suggesting vertically organized RF mechanisms. Across the population, some cells bore close resemblance to theoretically proposed filters, while others had a complexity that was clearly not generalizable, to the extent that they seemed more suited to detection of specific structures. We would speculate that the broadly varying forms of cat cortical receptive fields result from developmental processes akin to those that form ocular-dominance columns, but on a smaller scale.

scholarly journals Attention operates uniformly throughout the classical receptive field and the surround

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bram-Ernst Verhoef ◽  
John HR Maunsell
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spatial Summation ◽  
Field Structure ◽  
Neuronal Responses ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Area V4 ◽  
Classical Receptive Field ◽  
Spatially Varying

Shifting attention among visual stimuli at different locations modulates neuronal responses in heterogeneous ways, depending on where those stimuli lie within the receptive fields of neurons. Yet how attention interacts with the receptive-field structure of cortical neurons remains unclear. We measured neuronal responses in area V4 while monkeys shifted their attention among stimuli placed in different locations within and around neuronal receptive fields. We found that attention interacts uniformly with the spatially-varying excitation and suppression associated with the receptive field. This interaction explained the large variability in attention modulation across neurons, and a non-additive relationship among stimulus selectivity, stimulus-induced suppression and attention modulation that has not been previously described. A spatially-tuned normalization model precisely accounted for all observed attention modulations and for the spatial summation properties of neurons. These results provide a unified account of spatial summation and attention-related modulation across both the classical receptive field and the surround.

Disruption of Balanced Cortical Excitation and Inhibition by Acoustic Trauma

2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 646-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Scholl ◽  
Michael Wehr
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Acoustic Trauma ◽  
Tone Frequency ◽  
Synaptic Excitation ◽  
Before And After ◽  
High Level ◽  
Whole Cell Recordings

Sensory deafferentation results in rapid shifts in the receptive fields of cortical neurons, but the synaptic mechanisms underlying these changes remain unknown. The rapidity of these shifts has led to the suggestion that subthreshold inputs may be unmasked by a selective loss of inhibition. To study this, we used in vivo whole cell recordings to directly measure tone-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs in auditory cortical neurons before and after acoustic trauma. Here we report that acute acoustic trauma disrupted the balance of excitation and inhibition by selectively increasing and reducing the strength of inhibition at different positions within the receptive field. Inhibition was abolished for frequencies far below the trauma-tone frequency but was markedly enhanced near the edges of the region of elevated peripheral threshold. These changes occurred for relatively high-level tones. These changes in inhibition led to an expansion of receptive fields but not by a simple unmasking process. Rather, membrane potential responses were delayed and prolonged throughout the receptive field by distinct interactions between synaptic excitation and inhibition. Far below the trauma-tone frequency, decreased inhibition combined with prolonged excitation led to increased responses. Near the edges of the region of elevated peripheral threshold, increased inhibition served to delay rather than abolish responses, which were driven by prolonged excitation. These results show that the rapid receptive field shifts caused by acoustic trauma are caused by distinct mechanisms at different positions within the receptive field, which depend on differential disruption of excitation and inhibition.

Responses of primate SI cortical neurons to noxious stimuli

1983 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1479-1496 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. R. Kenshalo ◽  
O. Isensee
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
The Body ◽  
Thermal Stimulation ◽  
Discharge Frequency ◽  
Mechanical Stimuli ◽  
Noxious Heat ◽  
Nociceptive Neurons ◽  
Heat Pulses

Recordings were made from single SI cortical neurons in the anesthetized macaque monkey. Each isolated cortical neuron was tested for responses to a standard series of mechanical stimuli. The stimuli included brushing the skin, pressure, and pinch. The majority of cortical neurons responded with the greatest discharge frequency to brushing the receptive field, but neurons were found in areas 3b and 1 that responded maximally to pinching the receptive field. A total of 68 cortical nociceptive neurons were examined in 10 animals. Cortical neurons that responded maximally to pinching the skin were also tested for responses to graded noxious heat pulses (from 35 to 43, 45, 47, and 50 degrees C). If the neuron failed to respond or only responded to 50 degrees C, the receptive field was also heated to temperatures of 53 and 55 degrees C. Fifty-six of the total population of nociceptive neurons were tested for responses to the complete series of noxious heat pulses: 46 (80%) exhibited a progressive increase in the discharge frequency as a function of stimulus intensity, and the spontaneous activity of two (4%) was inhibited. One population of cortical nociceptive neurons possessed restricted, contralateral receptive fields. These cells encoded the intensity of noxious mechanical and thermal stimulation. Sensitization of primary afferent nociceptors was reflected in the responses of SI cortical nociceptive neurons when the ascending series of noxious thermal stimulation was repeated. The population of cortical nociceptive neurons with restricted receptive fields exhibited no adaptation in the response during noxious heat pulses of 47 and 50 degrees C. At higher temperatures the response often continued to increase during the stimulus. The other population of cortical nociceptive neurons was found to have restricted, low-threshold receptive fields on the contralateral hindlimb and, in addition, could be activated only by intense pinching or noxious thermal stimuli delivered on any portion of the body. The stimulus-response functions obtained from noxious thermal stimulation of the contralateral hindlimb were not different from cortical nociceptive neurons with small receptive fields. However, nociceptive neurons with large receptive fields exhibited a consistent adaptation during a noxious heat pulse of 47 and 50 degrees C. Based on the response characteristics of these two populations of cortical nociceptive neurons, we conclude that neurons with small receptive fields possess the ability to provide information about the localization, the intensity, and the temporal attributes of a noxious stimulus.4+.

Transient and prolonged effects of acetylcholine on responsiveness of cat somatosensory cortical neurons

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1253-1276 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Metherate ◽  
N. Tremblay ◽  
R. W. Dykes
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Somatosensory Cortex ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Cortical Layers ◽  
Afferent Inputs ◽  
Time Periods ◽  
Layer I ◽  
Layer Vi

1. Two-hundred and seven neurons were examined for changes in their responsiveness during the iontophoretic administration of acetylcholine (ACh) in barbiturate-anesthetized cats. 2. The laminar locations of 78 cells were determined. Cholinoceptive neurons were found in all cortical layers and ranged from 50% of the cells tested in layer I to 78% in layer VI. 3. When the responsiveness of a neuron was measured by the magnitude of the discharge generated by a fixed dose of glutamate, 30 of 47 cases (64%) were potentiated, and 4 (8%) were depressed when ACh was administered during glutamate-induced excitation. 4. ACh administered during glutamate excitation was significantly more effective in altering neuronal responsiveness than was ACh administered alone (P less than 0.001). 5. When the responsiveness of a neuron was measured by the magnitude of the discharge generated by a standard somatic stimulus applied to the receptive field, 42 of 52 cases (81%) were potentiated during ACh application. This was again different from ACh treatment alone where only 4 of 27 tests (15%) resulted in subsequent enhancement of the response to somatic stimuli. 6. ACh generally increased the responsiveness of neurons with peripheral receptive fields and caused the appearance of a receptive field in some cells lacking one. 7. In many cases the changes in excitability, as measured by responses either to glutamate or to somatic stimulation, remained for prolonged time periods. When glutamate was used to test excitability, 34% (16 of 47) of the enhancements lasted more than 5 min. When somatic stimuli were used 29% (15 of 52) lasted more than 5 min. With both measures some neurons still displayed enhanced responses more than 1 h after the treatment with ACh. 8. ACh appears to act as a permissive agent that allows modification of the effectiveness with which previously existing afferent inputs drive somatosensory cortical neurons. 9. This mechanism to alter neuronal responsiveness has many of the characteristics necessary to account for the reorganization observed in somatosensory cortex following alterations in its afferent drive and may be related to some forms of learning and memory.

Range and Mechanism of Encoding of Horizontal Disparity in Macaque V1

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 209-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J.D. Prince ◽  
B. G. Cumming ◽  
A. J. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Tuning Curve ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Careful Examination ◽  
Phase Encoding ◽  
Tuning Curves ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Gabor Functions ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

The responses of single cortical neurons were measured as a function of the binocular disparity of dynamic random dot stereograms for a large sample of neurons ( n = 787) from V1 of the awake macaque. From this sample, we selected 180 neurons whose tuning curves were strongly tuned for disparity, well sampled and well described by one-dimensional Gabor functions. The fitted parameters of the Gabor functions were used to resolve three outstanding issues in binocular stereopsis. First, we considered whether tuning curves can be meaningfully divided into discrete tuning types. Careful examination of the distributions of the Gabor parameters that determine tuning shape revealed no evidence for clustering. We conclude that a continuum of tuning types is present. Second, we investigated the mechanism of disparity encoding for V1 neurons. The shape of the disparity tuning function can be used to distinguish between position-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by an interocular shift in receptive field position) and phase-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by a difference in the receptive field profile in the 2 eyes). Both position and phase encoding were found to be common. This was confirmed by an independent assessment of disparity encoding based on the measurement of disparity sensitivity for sinusoidal luminance gratings of different spatial frequencies. The contributions of phase and position to disparity encoding were compared by estimating a population average of the rate of change in firing rate per degree of disparity. When this was calculated separately for the phase and position contributions, they were found to be closely similar. Third, we investigated the range of disparity tuning in V1 as a function of eccentricity in the parafoveal range. We find few cells which are selective for disparities greater than ±1 ° even at the largest eccentricity of ∼5 °. The preferred disparity was correlated with the spatial scale of the tuning curve, and for most units lay within a ±π radians phase limit. Such a size-disparity correlation is potentially useful for the solution of the correspondence problem.

scholarly journals Multidimensional receptive field processing by cat primary auditory cortical neurons

Neuroscience ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 359 ◽  
pp. 130-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig A. Atencio ◽  
Tatyana O. Sharpee
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons

Effects of LTP on Response Selectivity of Simulated Cortical Neurons

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Kilborn ◽  
Gary Lynch ◽  
Richard Granger
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Piriform Cortex ◽  
Long Term Potentiation ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Step Size ◽  
Analytical Treatment ◽  
Cortical Cells ◽  
Term Potentiation ◽  
Physiological Values

We report here on specific ways in which synaptic long-term potentiation (LTP) affects the response selectivity of primary sensory cortical cells. LTP increases synaptic efficacy by incremental “steps,” up to a “ceiling” at which additional bursts of afferent stimulation cause no further potentiation. Endogenous and exogenous agents have been shown to modulate these two paramenters of LTP, raising the question of the functional implications associated with the sizes of steps and ceiling. We provide an analytical treatment of the effects of these two physiological LTP parameters on the behavior of simulated olfactory (piriform) cortex target cells in response to a range of inputs. A target cell's receptive field, i.e., the set of input patterns to which the cell responds, is broadened with potentiation of the cell's synapses, and is broadened more when the LTP step size is smaller, and when the LTP ceiling is higher. Moreover, the effects of step size and ceiling interact, and their joint relationship to receptive field breadth is nonlinear. Values of step size and ceiling are identified that balance the tradeoff between learning rate and receptive field breadth for particular sensory recognition tasks, and these model values are compared to corresponding known and inferred physiological values.

scholarly journals The physiological basis for the computation of direction selectivity in the Drosophila OFF pathway

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giordano Ramos-Traslosheros ◽  
Marion Silies
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Cortical Neurons ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Motion Computation ◽  
Biological Substrate ◽  
Field Organization ◽  
Receptive Field Organization ◽  
Neuronal Computation

In Drosophila, direction-selective neurons implement a mechanism of motion computation similar to cortical neurons, using contrast-opponent receptive fields with ON and OFF subunits. It is not clear how the presynaptic circuitry of direction-selective neurons in the OFF pathway supports this computation, because all major inputs are OFF-rectified neurons. Here, we reveal the biological substrate for motion computation in the OFF pathway. Three interneurons, Tm2, Tm9 and CT1, also provide information about ON stimuli to the OFF direction-selective neuron T5 across its receptive field, supporting a contrast-opponent receptive field organization. Consistent with its prominent role in motion detection, variability in Tm9 receptive field properties is passed on to T5, and calcium decrements in Tm9 in response to ON stimuli are maintained across behavioral states, while spatial tuning is sharpened by active behavior. Together, our work shows how a key neuronal computation is implemented by its constituent neuronal circuit elements to ensure direction selectivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document