Faculty Opinions recommendation of Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis.

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alik Sagie
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Contractile Reserve

scholarly journals 212 Assessment of Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve in Patients with Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (Suppl 6) ◽  
pp. A140.2-A141
Author(s):  
Ana Rita Cabaco ◽  
Omar Aldalati ◽  
Mehdi Eskandari ◽  
Miriam Silaschi ◽  
Emma Alcock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Contractile Reserve ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction

scholarly journals Influence of Preoperative Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve on Postoperative Ejection Fraction in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Circulation ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 113 (14) ◽  
pp. 1738-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Paul Quere ◽  
Jean-Luc Monin ◽  
Franck Levy ◽  
Hélène Petit ◽  
Serge Baleynaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Contractile Reserve

scholarly journals First-phase ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts outcomes in aortic stenosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haotian Gu ◽  
Rong Bing ◽  
Calvin Chin ◽  
Lingyun Fang ◽  
Audrey C. White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Extracellular Volume ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards

Abstract Background First-phase ejection fraction (EF1; the ejection fraction measured during active systole up to the time of maximal aortic flow) measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is a powerful predictor of outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess whether cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) might provide more precise measurements of EF1 than TTE and to examine the correlation of CMR EF1 with measures of fibrosis. Methods In 141 patients with at least mild aortic stenosis, we measured CMR EF1 from a short-axis 3D stack and compared its variability with TTE EF1, and its associations with myocardial fibrosis and clinical outcome (aortic valve replacement (AVR) or death). Results Intra- and inter-observer variation of CMR EF1 (standard deviations of differences within and between observers of 2.3% and 2.5% units respectively) was approximately 50% that of TTE EF1. CMR EF1 was strongly predictive of AVR or death. On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, the hazard ratio for CMR EF1 was 0.93 (95% confidence interval 0.89–0.97, p = 0.001) per % change in EF1 and, apart from aortic valve gradient, CMR EF1 was the only imaging or biochemical measure independently predictive of outcome. Indexed extracellular volume was associated with AVR or death, but not after adjusting for EF1. Conclusions EF1 is a simple robust marker of early left ventricular impairment that can be precisely measured by CMR and predicts outcome in aortic stenosis. Its measurement by CMR is more reproducible than that by TTE and may facilitate left ventricular structure–function analysis.

scholarly journals Natural Progression of Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antony Leslie Innasimuthu ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Jason Lazar ◽  
William E. Katz
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Mild Stenosis ◽  
Natural Progression

Because the natural progression of low-gradient aortic stenosis (LGAS) has not been well defined, we performed a retrospective study of 116 consecutive patients with aortic stenosis who had undergone follow-up echocardiography at a median interval of 698 days (range, 371–1,020 d). All patients had preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (>0.50) during and after follow-up. At baseline, patients were classified by aortic valve area (AVA) as having mild stenosis (≥1.5 cm2), moderate stenosis (≥1 to <1.5 cm2), or severe stenosis (<1 cm2). Severe aortic stenosis was further classified by mean gradient (LGAS, mean <40 mmHg; high-gradient aortic stenosis [HGAS], mean ≥40 mmHg). We compared baseline and follow-up values among 4 groups: patients with mild stenosis, moderate stenosis, LGAS, and HGAS. At baseline, 30 patients had mild stenosis, 54 had moderate stenosis, 24 had LGAS, and 8 had HGAS. Compared with the moderate group, the LGAS group had lower AVA but similar mean gradient. Yet the actuarial curves for progressing to HGAS were significantly different: 25% of patients in LGAS reached HGAS status significantly earlier than did 25% of patients in the moderate-AS group (713 vs 881 d; P=0.035). Because LGAS has a high propensity to progress to HGAS, we propose that low-gradient aortic stenosis patients be closely monitored as a distinct subgroup that warrants more frequent echocardiographic follow-up.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document