Software and systems engineering. Work product reviews

2017 ◽  
Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Yoothana Suansook ◽  
Tanongsak Taweesri

Systems engineering work begins with the concept of product design, product development and product implementation. The relationships between each step are complicated. This article is presenting the symbolic language that develops for managing the complexity in system engineering. The applications of this language are assisting in explaining the relationships as a blueprint that describes the details of the various parts especially defense industry.


Author(s):  
James Wasiak ◽  
Ben Hicks ◽  
Andy Dong ◽  
Linda Newnes

It is said, though not yet assessed, that a large amount of potentially valuable information may reside in engineering email correspondence. If this is the case, then due consideration must be given to the role of email for record keeping, Product Lifecycle Management and knowledge management. In order to examine this hypothesis, a methodology for assessing the information content of emails, and in particular those associated with engineering projects, has been created. The method is based on a textual analysis approach that is derived from cognitive design research and social psychology and further developed through iterative applications to industrial datasets. The paper describes the development of the approach and its classifications of what the subject of the email is, why the email has been sent, and how its content is expressed. The approach is validated using an email corpus from a software design project. The method is then applied to characterize the content of 800 emails from a large systems engineering project. The key findings from this major study are then presented and discussed with respect to the character of the content, including evidence of engineering work, the project lifecycle, and implications for information and knowledge management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie F. Reyna ◽  
David A. Broniatowski

Abstract Gilead et al. offer a thoughtful and much-needed treatment of abstraction. However, it fails to build on an extensive literature on abstraction, representational diversity, neurocognition, and psychopathology that provides important constraints and alternative evidence-based conceptions. We draw on conceptions in software engineering, socio-technical systems engineering, and a neurocognitive theory with abstract representations of gist at its core, fuzzy-trace theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document