Energy performance of buildings. Energy needs for heating and cooling, internal temperatures and sensible and latent heat loads

2017 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Latent Heat ◽  
Energy Performance ◽  
Energy Performance Of Buildings ◽  
Heating And Cooling ◽  
Energy Needs ◽  
Heat Loads

scholarly journals Hybridization of Heat Pump Systems With Natural Ventilation To Improve Energy Efficiency in Cooling Dominated Buildings

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Nuno R. Martins ◽  
Peter J. Bourne-Webb
Keyword(s):  
Heat Pump ◽  
Natural Ventilation ◽  
Energy Performance ◽  
Ground Temperature ◽  
Improve Energy Efficiency ◽  
Final Energy ◽  
Heating And Cooling ◽  
Energy Needs ◽  
Energy Simulations ◽  
Cooling Loads

Building foundation piles can be used as heat exchangers in ground-source heat pump (GSHP) systems to provide highly efficient renewable heating and cooling (H&C). Unbalanced H&C loads lead to heat build-up in the ground, decreasing the system's overall performance. In this study, the introduction of natural ventilation (NV) has been examined to decrease cooling load imbalance in cooling-dominated buildings to improve system efficiency. Building energy simulations estimated the H&C loads for an office building in three Portuguese cities: Lisbon, Porto and Faro, yielding heating loads of 0.2–3.6 MWh/year and cooling loads of 260–450 MWh/year. Four renewable H&C technology scenarios were used to assess energy performance: (1) an air-source heat pump (ASHP) system; (2) a GSHP system utilizing energy piles; (3) hybrid ASHP-NV and (4) hybrid GSHP-NV. Over 50 years of operation, in Scenario (1) COP values of 2.45–2.55 (heating) and 3.62–4.15 (cooling) were obtained. In (2), COP values increased to 4.15–4.34 (heating) but fell to 3.36–3.79 (cooling), which increased annual final energy needs by 7–8%. Unbalanced cooling loads increased the ground temperature by 21–24 °C, which is unlikely to be acceptable. Compared to (1), introducing NV reduced cooling loads by 65–90% in Scenarios (3) and (4), with the final energy needs decreasing by 59–80% and 62–88%, respectively. A further benefit of the GSHP-NV hybrid is that the ground temperature increase was limited to 8‑12 °C. For cooling, the COP in (3) decreased compared to (1) (3.14–3.69), while in (4), COP improved to 3.45–6.10. This study concludes that hybrid GSHP-NV systems should be considered in some cooling-dominated scenarios.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document