scholarly journals An in-vitro investigation of frictional resistance of self-ligating and ceramic brackets when subjected to different ligation methods and tipping angles

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd S. Bovenizer
Keyword(s):  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
In Vitro Investigation ◽  
Ceramic Brackets

scholarly journals A novel customized ceramic bracket for esthetic orthodontics: in vitro study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Yang ◽  
Guangfu Yin ◽  
Xiaoming Liao ◽  
Xing Yin ◽  
Niansong Ye
Keyword(s):  
Shape Matching ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Ceramic Bracket

Abstract Background This study aims to develop a novel process to establish a standardized manufacturing technique of customized esthetic ceramic bracket system (CCB) which could be endowed with individual color and shape to satisfy patients’ individual demands. Material characteristics and mechanical parameters of CCB were evaluated. Subjects and methods CCB virtual models were designed individually according to patient’s teeth morphology and clinical demands. 3D printing technology, lost-wax technology, and selected glass-ceramic ingots were employed to fabricate CCB. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed to characterize the surface morphology of CCB and commercially available brackets (Clarity Advanced; Crystalline VII; Inspire ICE; Damon Q). Static and kinetic frictional resistance (FR), shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores were recorded. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey’s HSD multiple tests were used for statistical analyses. Results Multi-color and multi-transparency raw materials facilitated CCB with a wide range of color options and controllable optical properties to satisfy different esthetic demands of individual orthodontic patients. CCB presented same level of FR as commercially available ceramic brackets did. No significant differences (P ≥ 0.05) of SBS were observed among CCB-ES (treated silane), Clarity Advanced and Crystalline VII groups, and CCB-E (no silane) attained the highest ARI mean score 3. In the preliminary clinical trial, CCB presented excellent color-matching and shape-matching appearances similar to natural teeth, which made it highly invisible from social intercourse distance. Conclusions CCB were demonstrated to be an applicable labial orthodontic bracket system with optimized esthetics and biomechanics. We envision that it would be an ideal alternative for patients who pursue esthetic orthodontic treatment but were not likely to take lingual appliances or clear aligners.

scholarly journals Surface roughness of three types of modern plastic bracket slot floors and frictional resistance

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 177-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Hwan Choi ◽  
Da-Young Kang ◽  
Chung–Ju Hwang
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Lower Surface ◽  
Reinforced Plastic ◽  
Ceramic Brackets ◽  
Sliding Test ◽  
Plastic Brackets

ABSTRACT Objective: To quantitatively analyze the surface roughness of the slot floors of three types of modern plastic brackets and to measure static frictional force during sliding mechanics in vitro. Materials and Methods: Control groups comprised stainless steel brackets and monocrystalline ceramic brackets. Test groups comprised three types of 0.022-in slot, Roth prescription, plastic, maxillary right central incisor brackets. Test groups included glass fiber-reinforced polycarbonate, filler-reinforced polycarbonate, and hybrid polymer with inserted metal slot brackets. The static frictional resistance caused by sliding movements with an archwire (stainless steel) in vitro was quantitatively analyzed. Both scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional optical surface profiling were used. Results: Scanning electron microscope and three-dimensional optical surface profiler revealed that all as-received brackets had irregular slot floor surfaces, and both irregularity and roughness increased after the archwire sliding test. The ceramic brackets in the control group showed significantly lower surface roughness values and higher frictional values during the archwire sliding test compared with the other brackets. The glass or filler-reinforced plastic brackets exhibited significantly higher static frictional values than the metallic slot type brackets (P < .001). The hybrid polymer with inserted metal slot brackets showed relatively lower surface roughness and frictional values compared with the stainless steel control bracket. Conclusion: Glass or filler-reinforced plastic brackets showed higher frictional resistance than metallic slot–type brackets. A plastic bracket with inserted metal slot may be the best choice among plastic brackets for low frictional resistance and to avoid damage from sliding movements of the archwire.

scholarly journals An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 390-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tecco ◽  
D. Di Iorio ◽  
G. Cordasco ◽  
I. Verrocchi ◽  
F. Festa
Keyword(s):  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Low Friction ◽  
In Vitro Investigation

In vitro investigation of Varizella zoster virus as an oncolytic virus in glioblastoma therapy

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Leske ◽  
A Baiker ◽  
C Schichor ◽  
J.C Tonn ◽  
R Goldbrunner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oncolytic Virus ◽  
In Vitro Investigation ◽  
Varizella Zoster Virus

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Frictional forces between different Archwire-bracket Combinations

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinit Singh ◽  
Swati Acharya ◽  
Satyabrata Patnaik ◽  
Smruti Bhusan Nanda
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Tooth Movement ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Frictional Resistance ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Orthodontic Bracket ◽  
Fixed Appliance ◽  
Beta Titanium ◽  
Frictional Forces

Introduction: During sliding mechanics, frictional resistance is an important counterforce to orthodontic tooth movement; whichmust be controlled to allow application of light continuous forces.Objective: To investigate static and kinetic frictional resistance between three orthodontic brackets: ceramic, self-ligating, andstainless steel, and three 0.019×0.025” archwires: stainless steel, nickel-titanium, titanium-molybdenum.Materials & Method: The in vitro study compared the effects of stainless steel, nickel-titanium, and beta-titanium archwires onfrictional forces of three orthodontic bracket systems: ceramic, self-ligating, and stainless steel brackets. All brackets had 0.022”slots, and the wires were 0.019×0.025”. Friction was evaluated in a simulated half-arch fixed appliance on a testing machine. Thestatic and kinetic friction data were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Duncan multiple rangetest.Result: Self-ligating (Damon) brackets generated significantly lower static and kinetic frictional forces than stainless steel (Gemini)and ceramic brackets (Clarity). Among the archwire materials, Beta-titanium showed the maximum amount of frictional forceand stainless steel archwires had the lowest frictional force.Conclusion: The static and kinetic frictional force for stainless steel bracket was lowest in every combination of wire.

An In Vitro Investigation of Synergy or Antagonism between Antimicrobial Combinations against Isolates from Bacterial Keratitis

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (8) ◽  
pp. 4151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henri Sueke ◽  
Stephen B. Kaye ◽  
Timothy Neal ◽  
Amanda Hall ◽  
Stephen Tuft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Keratitis ◽  
In Vitro Investigation ◽  
Antimicrobial Combinations
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document