scholarly journals Preservice general education teachers' perceptions of special education training needs

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalie Renee Kossar
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Special Education Training ◽  
Education Training

Teacher Education

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 51-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Smith
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
Teacher Education ◽  
Multicultural Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
University Of Kansas ◽  
Education And Technology ◽  
Multicultural Perspectives ◽  
The University

In this issue, Dr. Monica Brown, a colleague here at the University of Kansas, offers perspectives related to multicultural education and technology. While specific needs exist within multicultural education, readers should see that there are direct correlation between the needs of multicultural education and technology and special education and technology. We would argue that as we strive to address training needs of future as well as current special and general education teachers towards technology, special education and multicultural perspectives should be considered as part of this process and be pertinent to the overall success.

scholarly journals UAE Teachers’ Awareness & Perceptions of Testing Modifications

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hala Elhoweris Elhoweris ◽  
Negmeldin Alsheikh
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Moderate Level ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Study Results

The objectives of this study were threefold: (a) to determine whether the Unit-ed Arab Emirates (UAE) general and special education teachers were making any specific testing modifications for students with disabilities; (b) to survey UAE general and special education teachers’ perceptions of testing modifications in terms of their usefulness, easiness, and fairness; and (c) to explore possible differences between general and special education teachers’ aware-ness and perceptions of testing modifications. Two hundred and eleven UAE general and special education teachers participated in this study. Results re-vealed that participants have a moderate level of awareness of testing modifications when assessing students with disabilities. Additionally, UAE teachers as a group perceived testing modifications as easy to make and fair. Statistically significant differences were found between general and special education teachers where special education teachers were found to be more informed than general education teachers.

Instructional Grouping for Reading: Teachers' Views

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally Watson Moody ◽  
Sharon Vaughn ◽  
Jeanne Shay Schumm
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
General Educators ◽  
Reading Teachers ◽  
Students With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Teachers Perceptions ◽  
Grouping Strategies ◽  
Group Interviews

The purpose of this study was to gain understanding of general and special education teachers' perceptions of grouping for reading and the types of grouping patterns that are implemented in classrooms in a diverse urban school district. Forty-nine third-grade teachers (29 general education teachers who had students with learning disabilities in their class for part of the day and 20 special education teachers) participated in the study. Individual and focus group interviews were used. The results of the interviews revealed that teachers value control over their decisions on how to group for reading. General education teachers indicated that they feel constrained by the demands of the district and school administration, whereas special education teachers believe they have more autonomy in their grouping decisions. The majority of the general educators reported predominant use of a whole class grouping format, whereas special education teachers used a more varied format. For the most part, general educators endorsed mixed-ability grouping arrangements for both social and academic reasons. Special educators, on the other hand, supported same-ability groups. The discussion provides insights into why teachers do not differentiate instruction when teaching in classrooms that have culturally, linguistically, and academically diverse student populations. The need for professional development in flexible grouping strategies is also addressed.

A Survey Study of Chinese In-service Teachers' Self-efficacy About Inclusive Education

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mian Wang ◽  
Fei Zan ◽  
Jiaqiu Liu ◽  
Chunling Liu ◽  
Umesh Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Special Education ◽  
General Education ◽  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Special Education Teachers ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
General Education Teachers ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Special Education Training ◽  
Laws And Policies

A survey study was conducted to a total of 323 in-service teachers (110 special education teachers and 213 general education teachers) in Shanghai regarding their self-efficacy and concerns about inclusive education. Multivariate analysis results reveal that special teachers have significantly higher self-efficacy about inclusive education than general education teachers and that both general and special education teachers have the similar concerns about inclusive education and the level of their concerns is not significant. In addition, the teachers' self-efficacy about inclusive education is significantly negative correlated with their concerns about inclusive education. Specific special education training experience and knowledge of disability laws and policies affect general and special education teachers differently on their self-efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document