scholarly journals An Evidence Based Web Intervention to Facilitate Nurse Practitioner Participation in the Policy Making Process Related to Scope of Practice

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toni DiChiacchio
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioner ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Scope Of Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Web Intervention ◽  
Practitioner Participation

scholarly journals The Data Shake: An Opportunity for Experiment-Driven Policy Making

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-18
Author(s):  
Grazia Concilio ◽  
Paola Pucci
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Critical Review ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Policy Design ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Collection Management ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Urban Problems ◽  
Design Experiments

AbstractThe wider availability of data and the growing technological advancements in data collection, management, and analysis introduce unprecedented opportunities, as well as complexity in policy making. This condition questions the very basis of the policy making process towards new interpretative models. Growing data availability, in fact, increasingly affects the way we analyse urban problems and make decisions for cities: data are a promising resource for more effective decisions, as well as for better interacting with the context where decisions are implemented. By dealing with the operative implications in the use of a growing amount of available data in policy making processes, this contribution starts discussing the chance offered by data in the design, implementation, and evaluation of a planning policy, with a critical review of the evidence-based policy making approaches; then it introduces the relevance of data in the policy design experiments and the conditions for its uses.

scholarly journals PENTINGNYA RISET KEBIJAKAN DALAM PEMBUATAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK UNGGUL DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Anugerah Yuka Asmara
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Personal Experience ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Policy Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Economic Consideration ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Research Results ◽  
New Public ◽  
Policy Making Process

A public policy in Indonesia tends to be implemented insufficiently good, although a public policy making process has been undertaken sequentially. One of factors is the neglected research results, particularly a social or policy research has not become yet as a main consideration for the policy makers. They tend using an intuition consideration and a personal experience rather than using the research results in determining a new public policy. Unfortunately, majority of policy makers use a political and economic consideration in each of stages of policy making process to fulfill the various elite interests, not for public as a whole. Important to be known that a evidence-based policy can create a sound public policy. It is a policy to resolve the recent problems, to minimize the mistakes/failures, and giving a bright wish for people in the future. The aim of this sound public policy is to hoist the image and trust of Indonesian Government in the perspective of Indonesian and foreign people currently.

Policy analysis and the legislature in Colombia

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-98
Author(s):  
Mónica Pachón ◽  
Manuela Muñoz
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Party System ◽  
Separation Of Powers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legislative Branch ◽  
Public Policy Process ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Legislative Output

This chapter describes the operation of the legislative branch in Colombia and the challenges of applying evidence-based analysis in the public policy process that occur within such a highly politicized environment. It summarizes some of the previous findings of the research conducted on the role of Congress in the contemporary policy-making process. It also shows how Congress has played an important part in reacting to executive bills, protecting constituency interests, leading public debates, and occasionally affecting the agenda impeding governmental action. The chapter covers the period after the 1991 Constitution, examining mostly the legislative output of Congress. It underscores the rules establishing the separation of powers and evaluates the nature of the party system determining the separation of purpose among the branches and the legislative output.

scholarly journals Conservation, evidence and policy

Oryx ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
William. M. Adams ◽  
Chris Sandbrook
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Policy Debate ◽  
Medical Outcomes ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Source Of Information

AbstractA growing literature argues for evidence-based conservation. This concept reflects a wider approach to policy-making and follows thinking in medicine, in which rigorous, objective analysis of evidence has contributed to widespread improvements in medical outcomes. Clearly, conservation decisions should be informed by the best information available. However, we identify issues relating to the type and sources of evidence commonly used and the way evidence-based conservation studies frame policy debate. In this paper we discuss two issues; firstly, we ask ‘what counts as evidence?’ (what is meant by evidence, and what kind of evidence is given credibility). We conclude that evidence-based conservation should adopt a broad definition of evidence to give meaningful space for qualitative data, and local and indigenous knowledge. Secondly, we ask ‘how does evidence count?’ (the relationship between evidence and the policy-making process). We conclude that there should be greater recognition that policy-making is a complex and messy process, and that the role of evidence in policy making can never be neutral. In the light of these issues we suggest some changes to build on developing practice under the title evidence-informed conservation. The change in terminology is subtle, yet it has profound implications in that it calls for a re-positioning and re-understanding of conservation science as one source of information among many for decision-makers.

scholarly journals Engaging with policy practitioners to promote institutionalisation of public participation in science, technology and innovation policy

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (04) ◽  
pp. N01
Author(s):  
Mitsuru Kudo ◽  
Go Yoshizawa ◽  
Kei Kano
Keyword(s):  
Public Participation ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Innovation Policy ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Technology And Innovation ◽  
Science Technology ◽  
Evidence Based Policy ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
Science Technology And Innovation

This paper is a reflective account of a public participation project the authors conducted in Japan in 2012–2015, as part of the central government's initiative for evidence-based policy-making. The reflection focusses on three key aspects of the project: setting a precedent of involving public participation in policy-making; embedding an official mechanism for public participation in policy-making process; and raising policy practitioners' awareness of public participation. We also discuss why we think engaging with policy practitioners, while problematic in various ways, is and will continue to be important in promoting institutionalised practice of public participation.

Positive Reintegration as a Way of Small and Medium-Sized Business Development

2012 ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
A. Zolotov ◽  
M. Mukhanov
Keyword(s):  
Policy Implementation ◽  
Policy Making ◽  
Economic Reforms ◽  
Alternative Possibility ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Compensation Mechanisms ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
Monitoring And Enforcement ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Modernization Process

А new approach to policy-making in the field of economic reforms in modernizing countries (on the sample of SME promotion) is the subject of this article. Based on summarizing the ten-year experience of de-bureaucratization policy implementation to reduce the administrative pressure on SME, the conclusion of its insufficient efficiency and sustainability is made. The alternative possibility is the positive reintegration approach, which provides multiparty policy-making process, special compensation mechanisms for the losing sides, monitoring and enforcement operations. In conclusion matching between positive reintegration principles and socio-cultural factors inherent in modernization process is provided.

A Study on the Policy-making Process of the Three Kindergarten Bills: Focusing on Fast Track Systems and the Devil Shift

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-171
Author(s):  
Jeong Ho Yoo ◽  
Yunju Yang ◽  
Ji Hye Choi ◽  
Seung Taek Lee ◽  
Rosa Minhyo Cho
Keyword(s):  
Policy Making ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Policy Making Process ◽  
The Devil
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document