scholarly journals Bending behavior of concrete T-beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Kalluri
Keyword(s):  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Gfrp Bars ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Bending Behavior

Tension stiffening and cracking of concrete reinforced with glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars

2004 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 579-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter H Bischoff ◽  
Richard Paixao
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Crack Spacing ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Tension Stiffening ◽  
Gfrp Bars ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced

Tension stiffening and cracking of axial tension members is evaluated for concrete reinforced with steel (reinforcing ratio ρ = 2.0%) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars (1.3%, 2.0%, and 2.9%), with shrinkage included in the analysis of the member response. Results show that because of a lower bar stiffness the GFRP-reinforced concrete exhibits greater tension stiffening than steel-reinforced concrete for any given value of axial member strain. Transverse cracking in the GFRP-reinforced concrete does not stabilize until much higher values of axial strain are reached, and longitudinal splitting cracks are also evident before cracking has stabilized. Crack widths in concrete reinforced with GFRP bars are larger because of their lower bar stiffness in combination with an increased crack spacing during the crack development stage. Tension stiffening of cracked reinforced concrete is taken into account using an average stress-strain response with a descending branch to model the concrete in tension. A tension stiffening factor is used to characterize this tensile property with an empirical relationship related to the reinforcing bar stiffness and independent of both concrete strength and reinforcing ratio. Results are also compared with the predicted member response based on the 1978 Comité Euro-International du Béton (CEB) CEB-FIP model code approach and American Concrete Institute (ACI) method of using an effective cracked section property for the transformed concrete area. This comparison shows that both methods are valid only for a limited range of reinforcing ratios.Key words: cracking, crack spacing, crack width, GFRP, reinforced concrete, tension stiffening.

Contribution of longitudinal glass fiber-reinforced polymer bars in concrete cylinders under axial compression

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 458-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon Fillmore ◽  
Pedram Sadeghian
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Modulus ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Gfrp Bars ◽  
Reinforced Polymer ◽  
Glass Fiber Reinforced ◽  
Steel Bars ◽  
Concrete Cylinders

Contribution of longitudinal glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars in concrete columns under compression has been ignored by current design guidelines. This paper challenges this convention by testing 21 concrete cylinders (150 mm × 300 mm) reinforced with longitudinal GFRP and steel bars in compression. It was observed that GFRP bars could sustain high level of compressive strains long after the peak load of the specimens without any premature crushing. The results of a new coupon test method showed that the elastic modulus of GFRP bars in compression is slightly higher than that of in tension, however the compressive strength was obtained 67% of tensile strength. An analytical model was successfully implemented to predict the axial capacity of the tests specimens and it was found that the contribution of the bars in the load capacity of the specimens was within 4.5–18.4% proportional to the bars reinforcement ratio normalized to the elastic modulus of steel bars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document