scholarly journals Extreme Precipitation Spatial Analog: In Search of an Alternative Approach for Future Extreme Precipitation in Urban Hydrological Studies

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel Wang ◽  
Francina Dominguez ◽  
Arthur Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Extreme Precipitation ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Change ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Precipitation Frequency ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Climate Change Assessment

In this paper, extreme precipitation spatial analog is examined as an alternative method to adapt extreme precipitation projections for use in urban hydrological studies. The idea for this method is that real climate records from some cities can serve as “analogs” that behave like potential future precipitation for other locations at small spatio-temporal scales. Extreme precipitation frequency quantiles of a 3.16 km 2 catchment in the Chicago area, computed using simulations from North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) Regional Climate Models (RCMs) with L-moment method, were compared to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Atlas 14 (NA14) quantiles at other cities. Variances in raw NARCCAP historical quantiles from different combinations of RCMs, General Circulation Models (GCMs), and remapping methods are much larger than those in NA14. The performance for NARCCAP quantiles tend to depend more on the RCMs than the GCMs, especially at durations less than 24-h. The uncertainties in bias-corrected future quantiles of NARCCAP are still large compared to those of NA14, and increase with rainfall duration. Results show that future 3-h and 30-day rainfall in Chicago will be similar to historical rainfall from Memphis, TN and Springfield, IL, respectively. This indicates that the spatial analog is potentially useful, but highlights the fact that the analogs may depend on the duration of the rainfall of interest.

scholarly journals California Wintertime Precipitation Bias in Regional and Global Climate Models

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 2147-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Caldwell
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Model Resolution ◽  
Grid Spacing ◽  
Precipitation Frequency

Abstract In this paper, wintertime precipitation from a variety of observational datasets, regional climate models (RCMs), and general circulation models (GCMs) is averaged over the state of California and compared. Several averaging methodologies are considered and all are found to give similar values when the model grid spacing is less than 3°. This suggests that California is a reasonable size for regional intercomparisons using modern GCMs. Results show that reanalysis-forced RCMs tend to significantly overpredict California precipitation. This appears to be due mainly to the overprediction of extreme events; RCM precipitation frequency is generally underpredicted. Overprediction is also reflected in wintertime precipitation variability, which tends to be too high for RCMs on both daily and interannual scales. Wintertime precipitation in most (but not all) GCMs is underestimated. This is in contrast to previous studies based on global blended gauge–satellite observations, which are shown here to underestimate precipitation relative to higher-resolution gauge-only datasets. Several GCMs provide reasonable daily precipitation distributions, a trait that does not seem to be tied to model resolution. The GCM daily and interannual variabilities are generally underpredicted.

scholarly journals Unravelling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thibault Lemaitre-Basset ◽  
Ludovic Oudin ◽  
Guillaume Thirel ◽  
Lila Collet
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Environmental Drivers ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Potential Evaporation ◽  
Evaporative Demand ◽  
Impact Studies

Abstract. The increasing air temperature in a changing climate will impact actual evaporation and have consequences for water resources management in energy-limited regions. In many hydrological models, evaporation is assessed by a preliminary computation of potential evaporation (PE) representing the evaporative demand of the atmosphere. Therefore, in impact studies the quantification of uncertainties related to PE estimation, which can arise from different sources, is crucial. Indeed, a myriad of PE formulations exist and the uncertainties related to climate variables cascade into PE computation. So far, no consensus has emerged on the main source of uncertainty in the PE modelling chain for hydrological studies. In this study, we address this issue by setting up a multi-model and multi-scenario approach. We used seven different PE formulations and a set of 30 climate projections to calculate changes in PE. To estimate the uncertainties related to each step of the PE calculation process (namely Representative Concentration Pathways, General Circulation Models, Regional Climate Models and PE formulations), an analysis of variance decomposition (ANOVA) was used. Results show that PE would increase across France by the end of the century, from +40 to +130 mm/year. In ascending order, uncertainty contributions by the end of the century are explained by: PE formulations (below 10 %), then RCPs (above 20 %), RCMs (30–40 %) and GCMs (30–40 %). Finally, all PE formulations show similar future trends since climatic variables are co-dependent to temperature. While no PE formulation stands out from the others, in hydrological impact studies the Penman-Monteith formulation may be preferred as it is representative of the PE formulations ensemble mean and allows accounting for climate and environmental drivers co-evolution.

scholarly journals On the potential use of glacier and permafrost observations for verification of climate models

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 400-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Beniston ◽  
Wilfried Haeberli ◽  
Martin Hoelzle ◽  
Alan Taylor
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Model Verification ◽  
Dominant Feature

While the capability of global and regional climate models in reproducing current climate has significantly improved over the past few years, the confidence in model results for remote regions, or those where complex orography is a dominant feature, is still relatively low. This is, in part, linked to the lack of observational data for model verification and intercomparison purposes.Glacier and permafrost observations are directly related to past and present energy flux patterns at the Earth-atmosphere interface and could be used as a proxy for air temperature and precipitation, particularly of value in remote mountain regions and boreal and Arctic zones where instrumental climate records are sparse or non-existent. It is particularly important to verify climate-model performance in these regions, as this is where most general circulation models (GCMs) predict the greatest changes in air temperatures in a warmer global climate.Existing datasets from glacier and permafrost monitoring sites in remote and high altitudes are described in this paper; the data could be used in model-verification studies, as a means to improving model performance in these regions.

Interpreting Results from the NARCCAP and NA-CORDEX Ensembles in the Context of Uncertainty in Regional Climate Change Projections

2018 ◽  
Vol 99 (10) ◽  
pp. 2093-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambarish V. Karmalkar
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
North America ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Change ◽  
Internal Variability ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Eastern United States ◽  
The Impact

AbstractTwo ensembles of dynamically downscaled climate simulations for North America—the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) and the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) featuring simulations for North America (NA-CORDEX)—are analyzed to assess the impact of using a small set of global general circulation models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs) on representing uncertainty in regional projections. Selecting GCMs for downscaling based on their equilibrium climate sensitivities is a reasonable strategy, but there are regions where the uncertainty is not fully captured. For instance, the six NA-CORDEX GCMs fail to span the full ranges produced by models in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) in summer temperature projections in the western and winter precipitation projections in the eastern United States. Similarly, the four NARCCAP GCMs are overall poor at spanning the full CMIP3 ranges in seasonal temperatures. For the Southeast, the NA-CORDEX GCMs capture the uncertainty in summer but not in winter projections, highlighting one consequence of downscaling a subset of GCMs. Ranges produced by the RCMs are often wider than their driving GCMs but are sensitive to the experimental design. For example, the downscaled projections of summer precipitation are of opposite polarity in two RCM ensembles in some regions. Additionally, the ability of the RCMs to simulate observed temperature trends is affected by the internal variability characteristics of both the RCMs and driving GCMs, and is not systematically related to their historical performance. This has implications for adequately sampling the impact of internal variability on regional trends and for using model performance to identify credible projections. These findings suggest that a multimodel perspective on uncertainties in regional projections is integral to the interpretation of RCM results.

scholarly journals Greenhouse Gas–Induced Changes in Summer Precipitation over Colorado in NARCCAP Regional Climate Models*

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (21) ◽  
pp. 8690-8697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Alexander ◽  
James D. Scott ◽  
Kelly Mahoney ◽  
Joseph Barsugli
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Summer Precipitation ◽  
Regional Climate Change ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
The North ◽  
Climate Model Simulations ◽  
Climate Change Assessment

Abstract Precipitation changes between 32-yr periods in the late twentieth and mid-twenty-first centuries are investigated using regional climate model simulations provided by the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP). The simulations generally indicate drier summers in the future over most of Colorado and the border regions of the adjoining states. The decrease in precipitation occurs despite an increase in the surface specific humidity. The domain-averaged decrease in daily summer precipitation occurs in all of the models from the 50th through the 95th percentile, but without a clear agreement on the sign of change for the most extreme (top 1% of) events.

Applying the new spatially distributed Added Value Index and Climate Change Downscaling Signal for Regional Climate Models to high-resolution EURO-CORDEX and convection permitting scale simulations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ciarlo ◽  
Erika Coppola ◽  
Emanuela Pichelli ◽  
Jose Abraham Torres Alavez ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
High Resolution ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Spatially Distributed

<p>Downscaling data from General Circulation Models (GCMs) with Regional Climate Models (RCMs) is a computationally expensive process, even more so running at the convection permitting scale (CP). Despite the high-resolution products of these simulations, the Added Value (AV) of these runs compared to their driving models is an important factor for consideration. A new method was recently developed to quantify the AV of historical simulations as well as the Climate Change Downscaling Signal (CCDS) of forecast runs. This method presents these quantities spatially and thus the specific regions with the most AV can be identified and understood.</p><p>An analysis of daily precipitation from a 55-model EURO-CORDEX ensemble (at 12 km resolution) was assessed using this method. It revealed positive AV throughout the domain with greater emphasis in regions of complex topography, coast-lines, and the tropics. Similar CCDS was obtained when assessing the RCP 8.5 far future runs in these domains. This paper looks more closely at the CCDS obtained with this method and compares it to other climate change signals described in other studies.</p><p>The same method is now being applied to assess the AV and CCDS of daily precipitation from an ensemble of models at the CP scale (~3 km) over different domains within Europe. The current stage of the analysis is also looking into the AV of using hourly precipitation instead of daily.</p>

Regional Extreme Monthly Precipitation Simulated by NARCCAP RCMs

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Gutowski ◽  
Raymond W. Arritt ◽  
Sho Kawazoe ◽  
David M. Flory ◽  
Eugene S. Takle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mississippi River ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Change ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Department Of Energy ◽  
Monthly Precipitation ◽  
The North ◽  
Climate Change Assessment ◽  
Environmental Prediction

Abstract This paper analyzes the ability of the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program (NARCCAP) ensemble of regional climate models to simulate extreme monthly precipitation and its supporting circulation for regions of North America, comparing 18 years of simulations driven by the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP)–Department of Energy (DOE) reanalysis with observations. The analysis focuses on the wettest 10% of months during the cold half of the year (October–March), when it is assumed that resolved synoptic circulation governs precipitation. For a coastal California region where the precipitation is largely topographic, the models individually and collectively replicate well the monthly frequency of extremes, the amount of extreme precipitation, and the 500-hPa circulation anomaly associated with the extremes. The models also replicate very well the statistics of the interannual variability of occurrences of extremes. For an interior region containing the upper Mississippi River basin, where precipitation is more dependent on internally generated storms, the models agree with observations in both monthly frequency and magnitude, although not as closely as for coastal California. In addition, simulated circulation anomalies for extreme months are similar to those in observations. Each region has important seasonally varying precipitation processes that govern the occurrence of extremes in the observations, and the models appear to replicate well those variations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document